From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA631C87FD1 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2025 08:19:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:CC:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=9N7+uAZkEN5ICi/bEpu3VTQA6hJVii3ReUztOEBsYHY=; b=VUJdzIdWDdq8wsvMSk0bHLSF7p Yxz6u/c/AjzAa7qr2vOPrRlzZjljomLxqh/TS9MYJ/U3XkH9DPxpWFQemRw/U0DDeDkuZ3Gpanyrm JMLX/bUWdYm8oeOm7OU/jEhsy1dQ6LFJHvdBbF8NMubEIYJkxa6CqVQ9xVdClVslanEFYkXc7JWbj /0FxGEBpwb35E+GvQwcu2eZg0V4izuG4bGsLsYK70nylOLerrwnjHFDGBakeTg4YBwgHjFF3k/6Mz 1aUJRv9/1LNtlo5vpTf7909UelDxDMDn8XCIb16KHF+sLr20H7HUOa4y710gwKdaaJHsZSuNYn5k4 lj6eBbmg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ujZMi-0000000EcZO-2psb; Wed, 06 Aug 2025 08:19:16 +0000 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.187]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ujZF7-0000000EbIO-3abZ for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2025 08:11:27 +0000 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.105]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4bxjYD0qPnz14ML1; Wed, 6 Aug 2025 16:06:24 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemf500011.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.131]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55C9114022F; Wed, 6 Aug 2025 16:11:20 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.109.254] (10.67.109.254) by dggpemf500011.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.131) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Wed, 6 Aug 2025 16:11:19 +0800 Message-ID: <94757d00-5a8e-ac6b-f832-030f33ccf771@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 16:11:18 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v7 0/7] arm64: entry: Convert to generic irq entry Content-Language: en-US To: Ada Couprie Diaz CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , References: <20250729015456.3411143-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> <6bd09b5b-9830-42b4-ad9e-9ad1e153e564@arm.com> From: Jinjie Ruan In-Reply-To: <6bd09b5b-9830-42b4-ad9e-9ad1e153e564@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.67.109.254] X-ClientProxiedBy: kwepems100002.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.206) To dggpemf500011.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.131) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250806_011126_058392_8E67E75B X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.09 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2025/8/5 23:08, Ada Couprie Diaz wrote: > Hi Jinjie, > > On 29/07/2025 02:54, Jinjie Ruan wrote: > >> Since commit a70e9f647f50 ("entry: Split generic entry into generic >> exception and syscall entry") split the generic entry into generic irq >> entry and generic syscall entry, it is time to convert arm64 to use >> the generic irq entry. And ARM64 will be completely converted to generic >> entry in the upcoming patch series. > Note : I had to manually cherry-pick a70e9f647f50 when pulling the series > on top of the Linux Arm Kernel for-next/core branch, but there might be > something I'm missing here. >> It seems that it is now in mainline v6.16-rc1 and linux-next but not Linux Arm Kernel for-next/core branch. [...] > I'll spend some time testing the series now, specifically given patch 6's > changes, but other than that everything I saw made sense and didn't look > like it would be of concern to me. Thank you for the test and review. > > Thanks, > Ada >