From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 17:20:22 +0200 Subject: [question] pread2, pwrite2 unistd symbols for compat In-Reply-To: <20160502134706.GA11396@yury-N73SV> References: <20160502134706.GA11396@yury-N73SV> Message-ID: <9552994.HgmuyIW9Ty@wuerfel> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Monday 02 May 2016 16:47:06 Yury Norov wrote: > Hi Andre, > > In patch 987aedb5d (eneric syscalls: wire up preadv2 and pwritev2 > syscalls) you add those syscalls with __SYSCALL macro. However, > compat architectures that does not use generic unistd (mips, s390), > declare compat version in their syscall tables. Maybe we'd replace > __SYSCALL macro with __SC_COMP? I think you are right and your change looks good. After I got the original patch from Andre and the same one from Christoph, I did not consider the possibility that they were both wrong and so I applied Andre's version. Can you resend the patch in proper form (with a Signed-off-by line, rebased to mainline and with a changelog I can use)? I'll apply it as soon as I get an Ack from Christoph then. Thanks! Arnd > diff --git a/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h b/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h > index 723479c..6ed4613 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h > +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h > @@ -721,9 +721,9 @@ __SC_WRAP(__NR_mlock2, sys_mlock2) > #define __NR_copy_file_range 285 > __SC_WRAP(__NR_copy_file_range, sys_copy_file_range) > #define __NR_preadv2 286 > -__SYSCALL(__NR_preadv2, sys_preadv2) > +__SC_COMP(__NR_preadv2, sys_preadv2, compat_sys_preadv2) > #define __NR_pwritev2 287 > -__SYSCALL(__NR_pwritev2, sys_pwritev2) > +__SC_COMP(__NR_pwritev2, sys_pwritev2, compat_sys_pwritev2) > > #undef __NR_syscalls > #define __NR_syscalls 288 > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel