From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: narmstrong@baylibre.com (Neil Armstrong) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:30:38 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: amlogic: Add Internal Clock Measurer bindings In-Reply-To: <20180716214516.GA31738@rob-hp-laptop> References: <1530624110-4687-1-git-send-email-narmstrong@baylibre.com> <1530624110-4687-3-git-send-email-narmstrong@baylibre.com> <20180716214516.GA31738@rob-hp-laptop> Message-ID: <964512dd-fddb-4919-446a-96db7cc22a8b@baylibre.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Rob, On 16/07/2018 23:45, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 03:21:49PM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote: >> The Amlogic Meson GX SoCs embeds a clock measurer IP to measure the internal >> clock paths frequencies. >> >> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/soc/amlogic/clk-measure.txt | 15 +++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/amlogic/clk-measure.txt >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/amlogic/clk-measure.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/amlogic/clk-measure.txt >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..ba9183a >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/amlogic/clk-measure.txt >> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ >> +Amlogic Internal Clock Measurer >> +=============================== >> + >> +The Amlogic SoCs contains an IP to measure the internal clocks. >> +The precision is multiple of MHz, useful to debug the clock states. > > What a simple yet useful debug tool. > >> + >> +Required properties: >> +- compatible: Shall contain "amlogic,meson-gx-clk-measure" >> +- reg: base address and size of the Clock Measurer register space. >> + >> +Example: >> + clock-measure at 8758 { >> + compatible = "amlogic,meson-gx-clk-measure"; >> + reg = <0x0 0x8758 0x0 0x10>; > > This doesn't really look like its own block though. Can't the parent > device instantiate the driver for this? As weird as it seems, on the GX family the registers are not on a aligned boundary, but yes it's its own block. On newer SoCs, they have a more aligned register address, with the exact same register set. Neil > > >> + }; >> -- >> 2.7.4 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> linux-arm-kernel mailing list >> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel