linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: okaya@codeaurora.org (Sinan Kaya)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v11 2/4] PCI: Factor out pci_bus_wait_crs()
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 16:32:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <967910e7-e64d-2fa4-10b8-ca0400d7ed2f@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170821202338.GD28977@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>

On 8/21/2017 4:23 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 03:37:06PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> On 8/21/2017 3:18 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> ...
>> if (pci_bus_crs_pending(id))
>> 	return pci_bus_wait_crs(dev->bus, dev->devfn, &id, 60000);
>>
>>> I think that makes sense.  We'd want to check for CRS SV being
>>> enabled, e.g., maybe read PCI_EXP_RTCTL_CRSSVE back in
>>> pci_enable_crs() and cache it somewhere.  Maybe a crs_sv_enabled bit
>>> in the root port's pci_dev, and check it with something like what
>>> pcie_root_rcb_set() does?
>>>
>>
>> You can observe CRS under the following conditions
>>
>> 1. root port <-> endpoint 
>> 2. bridge <-> endpoint 
>> 3. root port<->bridge
>>
>> I was relying on the fact that we are reading 0x001 as an indication that
>> this device detected CRS. Maybe, this is too indirect.
>>
>> If we also want to capture the capability, I think the right thing is to
>> check the parent capability.
>>
>> bool pci_bus_crs_vis_supported(struct pci_dev *bridge)
>> {
>> 	if (device type(bridge) == root port)
>> 		return read(root_crs_register_reg);
>>
>> 	if (device type(bridge) == switch)
>> 		return read(switch_crs_register);
> 
> I don't understand this part.  AFAIK, CRS SV is only a feature of root
> ports.  The capability and enable bits are in the Root Capabilities
> and Root Control registers.
> 

No question about it.

> It's certainly true that a device below a switch can respond with a
> CRS completion, but the switch is not the requester, and my
> understanding is that it would not take any action on the completion
> other than passing it upstream.
> 

I saw some bridge references in the spec for CRS. I was going to do
some research for it. You answered my question. I was curious how this
would impact the behavior.

"Bridge Configuration Retry Enable ? When Set, this bit enables PCI Express
to PCI/PCI-X bridges to return Configuration Request Retry Status (CRS) in
response to Configuration Requests that target devices below the bridge. 
Refer to the PCI Express to PCI/PCI-X Bridge Specification, Revision 1.0 for
further details."

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-21 20:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-18 21:31 [PATCH v11 0/4] PCI: Use CRS Software Visibility to wait for device to become ready Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-18 21:32 ` [PATCH v11 1/4] PCI: Don't ignore valid response before CRS timeout Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-21 14:02   ` Sinan Kaya
2017-08-21 17:44     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-18 21:32 ` [PATCH v11 2/4] PCI: Factor out pci_bus_wait_crs() Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-21 13:53   ` Sinan Kaya
2017-08-21 19:18     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-21 19:37       ` Sinan Kaya
2017-08-21 20:23         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-21 20:32           ` Sinan Kaya [this message]
2017-08-21 21:09             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-23  4:40         ` Sinan Kaya
2017-08-18 21:32 ` [PATCH v11 3/4] PCI: Handle CRS ("device not ready") returned by device after FLR Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-18 21:32 ` [PATCH v11 4/4] PCI: Warn periodically while waiting for device to become ready Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=967910e7-e64d-2fa4-10b8-ca0400d7ed2f@codeaurora.org \
    --to=okaya@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).