From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: okaya@codeaurora.org (Sinan Kaya) Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 09:24:28 -0500 Subject: [Linaro-acpi] ACPI namespace details for ARM64 In-Reply-To: References: <20161109220506.GN14322@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> Message-ID: <98c9564d-17f9-f549-6dd4-5c6abc1ba1a3@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 11/10/2016 6:18 PM, Al Stone wrote: > On 11/09/2016 03:05 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> We've been working through the details of getting ACPI to work on >> arm64, and there have been lots of questions about what this means for >> PCI. I've outlined this for several people individually, but I'm >> going to send this separately, apart from a specific patch series, to >> make sure we're all on the same page. Please correct my errors and >> misunderstandings. >> >> Bjorn >> >> [snip....] > > A big +1 to all of this. This also looks like something that should > be added to either PCI, ACPI or arm64 documentation (or even all three). > What do you think? I agree. In order to have compliant systems, we have to make PNP0C02 required in the PCIe appendix of the SBSA specification. > > Thank you for putting this together, Bjorn. > > -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.