From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com (Paul Kocialkowski) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 09:26:24 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Revert "drm/sun4i: Handle DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_*EDGE" In-Reply-To: References: <20180613081647.31183-1-paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com> Message-ID: <99b2583187fe9925251029e876b061aac9172597.camel@bootlin.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 23:52 +0200, Giulio Benetti wrote: > Hello, > > sorry for my ignorance. > I don't know the right patch workflow in the case of "revert commit". > When I fix this bug, should I have to re-submit the previous patch > entire plus bug-fix? > > Or do I have to submit patch with bug-fix only? Yes, that is usually how it works! The revert patch will be picked up by the maintainer (Maxime), integrated in his tree and eventually merged into Linus' tree (along with stable trees). Fixup patches for this will need to take into account the revert patch, so it becomes equivalent to submitting the same patch with that issue resolved. > Thanks in advance to everybody Cheers ! -- Paul Kocialkowski, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and kernel engineering https://bootlin.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: