From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23824C433DF for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:34:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E868820714 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:34:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="U/wvK1IE"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="UO29b4Rs" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E868820714 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From: Date:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=WKj396IhtbylHNBSvV68COwIOvzSzZ0NsVhoG8rN4fM=; b=U/wvK1IEUSV0r5H8me246Mctm b1WX1/Pm9Ndd/FmJRKQTS5hLC7wSTgKylbLv2HPH7VUrwsMG1GNpLyQY6+mrNfxOIbvqpck5QFb0s bSkY6lE1nL5c/qDKGJKm6VTcTF3+7JWgM2YEoJNWSKxAirudEHdgr/IvDKH5/MWC+jwOJX3h09JsE L3XivYKcVd/FP4t8JRmoL4pGLzk6ayehu8AT1skL5tX+7sONin5PxDm+HrHzpQfFL35cLz8CKeupx iAXY5SXB/8/SWLPJnYYlOUj97qx91NmoY7F/zTKhYjucerXQAgpXUOjuVVRn346nypXYxxYokcMVy /FhNJqchQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jkkZw-0004Nx-GH; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:34:52 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jkkZu-0004NZ-8n for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:34:51 +0000 Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F93C2068E; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:34:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1592210089; bh=QO5I7UdKNZGH1EgSgljjPrTCdDrfliFWuQpe4jpGydg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UO29b4Rs5W+wK46xfgIOrYnjY8HHXx3eOCuvwzLqsrCppZLuQIrFHCKxVoKyCiWmU siEa5/n+5Iw1+n895H2Z5ie0X0gC5b2cj7VoD7O26tmEtBIdEwY391NsMmgcQt0XSj 284SqImetYz0+v1qeGqHrBozYkthLyu2/IeqIvH8= Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org ([51.254.78.96] helo=www.loen.fr) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jkkZr-0031xr-OX; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 09:34:48 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 09:34:47 +0100 From: Marc Zyngier To: Lokesh Vutla Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] dt-bindings: irqchip: ti, sci-intr: Update bindings to drop the usage of gic as parent In-Reply-To: References: <20200520124454.10532-1-lokeshvutla@ti.com> <20200520124454.10532-5-lokeshvutla@ti.com> <20200528221406.GA769073@bogus> <4ea8c6110a16900220a65f1d44145146@kernel.org> <3f253e25-2ee7-96f2-3158-7f6be0710a33@ti.com> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.4 Message-ID: <9afd8a79d9c9ecfd35b6a4e66c93e298@kernel.org> X-Sender: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 51.254.78.96 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: lokeshvutla@ti.com, nm@ti.com, robh@kernel.org, grygorii.strashko@ti.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, t-kristo@ti.com, nsekhar@ti.com, peter.ujfalusi@ti.com, ssantosh@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200615_013450_347052_56E7F1C2 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.06 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Nishanth Menon , Rob Herring , Grygorii Strashko , Peter Ujfalusi , Device Tree Mailing List , Sekhar Nori , Tero Kristo , Santosh Shilimkar , Thomas Gleixner , Linux ARM Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2020-06-15 09:03, Lokesh Vutla wrote: > Hi Marc, > > On 01/06/20 5:06 pm, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >> Hi Marc, >> >> On 29/05/20 3:48 pm, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>> On 2020-05-29 11:14, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >>>> Hi Rob, >>>> >>>> On 29/05/20 3:44 am, Rob Herring wrote: >>>>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 06:14:46PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >>>>>> Drop the firmware related dt-bindings and use the hardware >>>>>> specified >>>>>> interrupt numbers within Interrupt Router. This ensures interrupt >>>>>> router >>>>>> DT node need not assume any interrupt parent type. >>>>> >>>>> I didn't like this binding to begin with, but now you're breaking >>>>> compatibility. >>>> >>>> Yes, I do agree that this change is breaking backward compatibility. >>>> But IMHO, >>>> this does cleanup of firmware specific properties from DT. Since >>>> this is not >>>> deployed out yet in the wild market, I took the leverage of breaking >>>> backward >>>> compatibility. Before accepting these changes from firmware team, I >>>> did >>>> discuss[0] with Marc on this topic. >>> >>> And I assume that should anyone complain about the kernel being >>> broken >>> because they have an old firmware, you'll be OK with the patches >>> being >>> reverted, right? >> >> I am assuming there is no one to complain as there is no product >> available yet >> with upstream kernel. Internally everyone is aware of the changes. So, >> yes I >> would agree with you to revert the changes if someone really needs it. >> :) > > Any chance you can shower your blessings on this series :) I have purposely ignored it just before and during the merge window. It is now firmly in my review queue. M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel