From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: javier@osg.samsung.com (Javier Martinez Canillas)
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 14:40:52 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: exynos: Use macros for GPIO to make it more
 readable
In-Reply-To: <1472645613-5362-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
References: <1472645613-5362-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Message-ID: <9c17ea4e-780e-2e1b-4c97-40399c8e3086@osg.samsung.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hello Krzysztof,

On 08/31/2016 02:13 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Example:
> -		samsung,pin-function = <0x2>;
> -		samsung,pin-pud = <0>;
> -		samsung,pin-drv = <0>;
> +		samsung,pin-function = <PIN_FUNC_SPC_2>;
> +		samsung,pin-pud = <PIN_PULL_NONE>;
> +		samsung,pin-drv = <PIN_DRV_LV1>;
>  
> This should be just more readable. Especially for drive strenghts which
> are unobvious and different between some SoCs.
>

I agree that's better to have macros for these instead of using magic numbers.

For all the series:

Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>

> Tested with dtx_diff:
> for i in dts-old/exynos*dtb; do scripts/dtc/dtx_diff $i dts-new/$(basename $i);  done
>

I've also tested the patches on an Exynos5800 Peach Pi board, and as expected
everything is working correctly since the compiled DTB is exactly the same.

So for patches 1/9 and 9/9:

Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America