From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: s.nawrocki@samsung.com (Sylwester Nawrocki) Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 11:38:21 +0200 Subject: [GIT PULL 1/4] ARM: exynos: SoC/Mach for v4.9 In-Reply-To: <20160908192434.GA609@sam-MacBookPro> References: <1472548739-20050-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <1472548739-20050-5-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <5635206.ooNAZCeQOe@wuerfel> <20160902163244.GB5534@kozik-lap> <08dfc5c7-e844-023c-b5a8-9996dfb403ff@samsung.com> <20160908192434.GA609@sam-MacBookPro> Message-ID: <9c7bb7bd-d347-03af-93c7-93534f43932d@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 09/08/2016 09:24 PM, Sam Van Den Berge wrote: > Thanks for the suggestion and apologies for the late response. Last couple of > days I've been figuring out what this would involve and I decided that I want > to give this a try. I found this patch series [1] that I'll use as an example. > If I understand it correctly, I'll need to create a dma_slave_map and > pass that via the platform data into the s3c24xx-dma driver. There I'll > need to fill in the filter_map of the dma slave device. Right? Yes, AFAIU that's what needs to be done. Subsequently, related DMA clients could be updated to not use dma_request_slave_channel_compat(). -- Thanks, Sylwester