Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mukesh Pilaniya <mpilaniy@redhat.com>
To: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>, Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Baoquan He <baoquan.he@linux.dev>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	Tao Liu <ltao@redhat.com>, Philipp Rudo <prudo@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec: return -ENOEXEC from image probe functions on mismatch
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 22:57:36 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9cbe111c-ff63-4f24-b518-094ddd7cea30@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2vxzv79c23j6.fsf@kernel.org>


Hi Pratyush,
On 14/08/26 7:43 pm, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13 2026, Mukesh Pilaniya wrote:
> 
>> Several kexec_file_load() image probe functions return -EINVAL when
>> they do not recognize the image format.  A probe function that rejects
>> an image should return -ENOEXEC to indicate that the image is not a
>> recognized executable format.  -EINVAL implies a problem with the
>> syscall parameters, not with image recognition.
>>
>> kexec_image_probe_default() iterates through registered loaders and
>> returns the last probe's error code to the caller.  That error
>> propagates as the kexec_file_load() return value to userspace.
>> Returning -EINVAL from a probe when no loader matches is semantically
>> incorrect and misleads userspace about the nature of the failure.
>>
>> Return -ENOEXEC from all probe functions and their helpers when the
>> image format is not recognized.
> 
> Sounds fine in principle but can you please also share what the real
> problem you face is and how changing these return codes helps? These
> error codes are uAPI and while we _can_ change them as long as we don't
> break something, there should be a clear motivation for doing so.
> 
> [...]
> 
While debugging a misleading error on s390x where kexec -s reported
"syscall kexec_file_load not available" instead of the actual EINVAL
from a kernel command line that exceeded the architecture limit, we
traced the problem to the kexec-tools userspace utility treating
EINVAL the same as ENOSYS and ENOEXEC -- as a signal to silently fall
back to kexec_load().

kexec-tools supports two syscalls: kexec_file_load() and the older
kexec_load(). With -a (the default), it tries kexec_file_load()
first and falls back to kexec_load() when the syscall is not
implemented (ENOSYS) or the kernel does not have a loader for the
image format. With -s, it uses kexec_file_load() only with no
fallback.

When the kernel returns -EINVAL it means something went wrong while
loading the image, not that the syscall is missing or the image
format is unrecognized. kexec-tools should not fall back to the
older syscall in that case. However, some kernel probe functions
currently return -EINVAL when the image header does not match,
instead of returning -ENOEXEC. Keeping EINVAL in the fallback set
to accommodate these probes has the side effect of also hiding
genuine loading errors like an oversized command line.

kexec-tools should only fall back when kexec_file_load() is not
implemented or does not have a matching loader -- not when something
goes wrong during load.

The fix on the kexec-tools side is to remove EINVAL from the fallback
set, but that requires the kernel to be clean first -- probe functions
must return -ENOEXEC when they do not recognize an image format, not -EINVAL.

kexec-tools patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260814075329.30203-1-mpilaniy@redhat.com/

A review of all kexec_file_ops.probe implementations found that arm64
image_probe(), riscv image_probe(), and loongarch efi_kexec_probe()
return -EINVAL where they should return -ENOEXEC. x86 bzImage64_probe()
and s390 s390_elf_probe() already use -ENOEXEC correctly.



      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-14 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-13  7:06 [PATCH] kexec: return -ENOEXEC from image probe functions on mismatch Mukesh Pilaniya
2026-08-13 13:13 ` Philipp Rudo
2026-08-14  7:59   ` Mukesh Pilaniya
2026-08-14 14:13 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-08-14 17:27   ` Mukesh Pilaniya [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9cbe111c-ff63-4f24-b518-094ddd7cea30@redhat.com \
    --to=mpilaniy@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ltao@redhat.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=pjw@kernel.org \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=prudo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox