From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2B4DC433E2 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 14:24:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 485EC21481 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 14:24:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="BqOy5BVk"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="QMX+0gMo" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 485EC21481 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=4vnTefDcZwWUiCMmlGUdRyNavQ0WWfHAhBulXNehgA0=; b=BqOy5BVkps1yyTO60kdGPJzoB EhqWKNTYR4LlvQ9uIqvOAXRJyuoccKcPj2VE6+gX8dnqUu0thnAPAvFyybclUZGTU2VA3T5wNZpGX XfpqNZkZENxq9A0NkMhhb7O2/sX7+wy0d3Nu1RGhBWP+b0dYiW6G9WiHtBn08slUbXgcBwHD+lfw5 Ba+IG0SabKeQT/6ADqNx3Q8MvgMi+Qhf8mLRZMez9z8niExmcOGZFiVVB6cfQXSaSl4nymhlZaQKR GM3v43+uy2c2l6R5VebQdW36aQmyUHzM85l4QbGso3Ai8CQbc51VvK7Yx6hkZCS68apxg79sSRUr4 NIL4Olv2w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kFI3T-0006JF-4A; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 14:23:35 +0000 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.249]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kFI3P-0006Gr-Q6 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 14:23:32 +0000 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 087ENTOZ013858; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 09:23:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1599488609; bh=vOt5jgEVI5IP+P9UtdrVL509eExBOW74aWC6FEjb+Ms=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=QMX+0gMoJGX9c4bZFtbLZ12SZeQaaeAqeF04GCGaR8mwLdSYZm38q5QpW0q4vVEJK seryiNxaDCxa2jEHoQJt0Q8Oq2fDDztBwpJzSpOhGVyMUBiP4pc/sJ3nbKy9sDda7h 948s74VICdKZ+x7OsYHdz6JKgHXZgp/JUJOkAOlo= Received: from DLEE108.ent.ti.com (dlee108.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.38]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 087ENT1I053179 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 7 Sep 2020 09:23:29 -0500 Received: from DLEE102.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.32) by DLEE108.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 09:23:29 -0500 Received: from lelv0327.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.183) by DLEE102.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 09:23:29 -0500 Received: from [10.24.69.20] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0327.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 087ENJNp087360; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 09:23:24 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: Initial support for Texas Instrument's J7200 Platform To: Nishanth Menon References: <20200827065144.17683-1-lokeshvutla@ti.com> <20200907141427.ti6r3h6namv2hezw@akan> From: Lokesh Vutla Message-ID: <9d8d6980-0b22-da45-52af-474c6d96c873@ti.com> Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 19:53:19 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200907141427.ti6r3h6namv2hezw@akan> Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200907_102331_958196_47223551 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.36 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Device Tree Mailing List , Grygorii Strashko , Sekhar Nori , Tero Kristo , Rob Herring , Linux ARM Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 07/09/20 7:44 pm, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 17:32-20200907, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 27/08/20 12:21 pm, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >>> This series adds initial support for latest new SoC, J7200, from Texas Instruments. >>> >>> The J7200 SoC is a part of the K3 Multicore SoC architecture platform. >>> It is targeted for for automotive gateway, vehicle compute systems, >>> Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) and Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) applications. >>> The SoC aims to meet the complex processing needs of modern embedded products. >>> >>> See J7200 Technical Reference Manual (SPRUIU1, June 2020) >>> for further details: https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/spruiu1 >>> >>> Changes since v1: >>> - Swapped Patch 1 and 2 as suggested by Nishanth. >>> - Added description for each SoC in yaml bindings. >>> >>> Testing: >>> - ./scripts/checkpatch --strict >>> - Few warningns about Line length exceeding 100 columns. >>> But these are corresponding to comments >>> - v8make dtbs_check >>> - DT_SCHEMA_FLAGS="-u" >>> DT_SCHEMA_FILES="Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml" >>> v8make dtbs_check >>> - DT_SCHEMA_FLAGS="-u" >>> DT_SCHEMA_FILES="Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml" >>> v8make dt_binding_check >> >> This series has been lying around for soo long with no major comments. It will >> be nice to get this merged. I understand we are waiting for Acks on yaml >> documentation but it would be bad to miss a merge window for a new platform >> because we are waiting for Acks on yaml conversion. > > I do require Rob / DT maintainer to ack the DT yaml conversion and the > j7200 binding addition. > > Besides yaml and compatibility acks, there are a few ancillary > comments to fix up.. Kconfig -> I think we should either stay with > status quo and create a new config option per SoC OR rename the > config to be generic (using j7200 with j721e SoC config is not very Please suggest your preference here. I guess separate defconfig for J7200? > consistent). In addition, around the stuff that is going to next in > parallel, the dts is generating additional warnings as well (DSS hmm..there is no DSS being added in this series. There is one checkpatch warning for PATCH 1: WARNING: DT binding docs and includes should be a separate patch. See: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst This can be ignored. > etc). I think it might be easier if we wait for DT maintainer ack on > bindings prior to giving further cosmetic comments (To allow for any > additional changes to come in to -next). > okay. Thanks and regards, Lokesh _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel