From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: shawn.gsc@gmail.com (Shawn Guo) Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 09:56:20 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 00/51] some more imx patches for 2.6.38 In-Reply-To: <20101117212821.GF8942@pengutronix.de> References: <20101117212821.GF8942@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Uwe, 2010/11/18 Uwe Kleine-K?nig : > Hello, > > Some of the patches in this series are already in Sascha's tree, I > resend them because several of them got minor fixes. > > The highlights are that for most devices for i.MX1, i.MX21, i.MX25 and > i.MX27 are allocated dynamically which reduces the memory footprint of > the kernel. ?Moreover I moved support for i.MX25 to mach-imx targeting a > multi-SoC-kernel for i.MX. > > Later I want to do the same for mx3. ?I'm not sure about mx5 though. > The discussion about integrating support for i.MX28 into mach-imx made > me questioning if this is sensible. ?Well, we'll see. > You are moving mach-mx25 into mach-imx, will do the same for mx3, and thinking about the same for mx5. But you are asking me to move mx28 out of mach-imx. This only makes sense for me if you think mx28 will not go into mach-imx forever. Are you sure about this? Otherwise we are doing something really bothering ourselves. -- Regards, Shawn