From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: penberg@kernel.org (Pekka Enberg) Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 13:18:54 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 0/7] Nexus One Support In-Reply-To: <1295645098.22882.1.camel@m0nster> References: <1295555565-21563-1-git-send-email-dwalker@codeaurora.org> <1295571359.9236.53.camel@m0nster> <1295574085.4096.6.camel@Joe-Laptop> <1295575123.9236.54.camel@m0nster> <1295576730.4096.24.camel@Joe-Laptop> <1295624801.19880.13.camel@m0nster> <20110121094827.41818a55@jbarnes-desktop> <20110121095658.1ab623fe@jbarnes-desktop> <1295632828.19880.22.camel@m0nster> <20110121100441.06a94482@jbarnes-desktop> <1295633882.19880.31.camel@m0nster> <1295642995.19880.42.camel@m0nster> <1295643762.25868.31.camel@Joe-Laptop> <1295645098.22882.1.camel@m0nster> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Daniel, On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 13:02 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: >> On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 12:49 -0800, Daniel Walker wrote: >> > On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 12:44 -0800, Dima Zavin wrote: >> > > Really though? Let's look at one of them: >> > > ? ? ? 2 Arve Hj?nnev?g >> > > ? ? ? 6 Brian Swetland >> > > ? ? ?14 Dima Zavin >> > > ? ? ? 2 Haley Teng >> > > ? ? ? 1 Iliyan Malchev >> > > ? ? ? 5 Mike Chan >> > I'll add this list into the commit text .. >> >> I think it'd be better if you pull them into a >> git repository, then use either: >> ? ? ? git format-patch >> ? ? ? git send-email >> or >> ? ? ? git request-pull >> >> That way no author history is lost. > > The history isn't upstreamable .. Why is that? I don't see any technical problem of upstreaming the original patches even if they don't compile (as long as they're not included in Makefiles or Kconfig files). There's no need to hide the real history even if it looks ugly... Pekka