From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: felipe.contreras@gmail.com (Felipe Contreras) Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:20:24 +0300 Subject: [RFC] tidspbridge: use a parameter to allocate shared memory In-Reply-To: <4CAE1CA1.4050006@ti.com> References: <1286430336-20204-1-git-send-email-omar.ramirez@ti.com> <201010070940.14208.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> <4CADFCEB.4030008@ti.com> <4CAE1CA1.4050006@ti.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote: > On 10/7/2010 1:22 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> Anyway, we will not know for sure until we try... Right? > > yes we can try, at least we now for sure arm side can be done. The only thing that changes is the cacheability of the ARM side memory, so of course only the ARM side matters. The DSP side will continue to do what it's doing and would not notice any difference if the memory is flushed, or is non-cacheable. -- Felipe Contreras