linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: errata: pl310 cache sync operation may be faulty
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:38:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikPGwcm-_j-NzW2UixaEx_ekJMjJcrTO1SUy7Ao@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297768683-30273-1-git-send-email-srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com>

On 15 February 2011 11:18, srinidhi kasagar
<srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com> wrote:
> +config ARM_ERRATA_753970
> + ? ? ? bool "ARM errata: cache sync operation may be faulty"
> + ? ? ? depends on CACHE_PL310
> + ? ? ? help
> + ? ? ? ? This option enables the workaround for the 753970 PL310 erratum.

Is this number correct? I couldn't find it in ARM's internal database.

> + ? ? ? ? Under some condition the effect of cache sync operation on
> + ? ? ? ? the store buffer still remains when the operation completes.
> + ? ? ? ? This means that the store buffer is always asked to drain and
> + ? ? ? ? this prevents it from merging any further writes. The workaround
> + ? ? ? ? is to replace the normal offset of cache sync operation (0x730)
> + ? ? ? ? by another offset targeting an unmapped PL310 register 0x740.
> + ? ? ? ? This has the same effect as the cache sync operation: store buffer
> + ? ? ? ? drain and waiting for all buffers empty.

You may want to specify the revision number this applies to so that
people to enable it if not needed.

-- 
Catalin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-02-15 16:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-15 11:18 [PATCH] ARM: errata: pl310 cache sync operation may be faulty srinidhi kasagar
2011-02-15 11:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-16  5:36   ` Srinidhi KASAGAR
2011-02-16  6:03   ` Srinidhi KASAGAR
2011-02-16 10:32     ` Catalin Marinas
2011-02-16 12:34       ` Srinidhi KASAGAR
2011-02-16 12:36         ` Catalin Marinas
2011-02-15 16:38 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2011-02-16  5:08   ` Srinidhi KASAGAR
2011-02-16 10:11     ` Catalin Marinas
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-02-14 11:37 srinidhi kasagar
2011-02-14 11:37 srinidhi kasagar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AANLkTikPGwcm-_j-NzW2UixaEx_ekJMjJcrTO1SUy7Ao@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).