From: shiraz.linux.kernel@gmail.com (shiraz hashim)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Some benchmarks on ARM
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:40:36 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikUH6p+cc4hVhDLNjkCJxEOnFBw-z-+07MUiv_J@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100819062802.GG30096@pengutronix.de>
Thanks Robert,
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Robert Schwebel
<r.schwebel@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:06:04AM +0530, shiraz hashim wrote:
>> > Here is a little article:
>> > http://www.pengutronix.de/development/kernel/arm-benchmarks-20100702_en.html
>>
>> Thanks for this link, it was quite informative. Can you also please
>> share the detailed report of lmbench tests which you run on these
>> platforms. For example, average cpu bandwidth figures (as in bw_mem
>> test) are not giving information on significant impact of caches and
>> DDR.
>
> Please check the updated version of the article - the page you've linked
> above contains a link at the top. The new version contains all the
> commands which have been used.
Now I see this, it is more clear.
--
regards
Shiraz Hashim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-19 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-02 18:02 Some benchmarks on ARM Robert Schwebel
2010-07-02 20:34 ` Magnus Lilja
2010-07-05 12:24 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2010-07-05 14:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-05 15:14 ` Måns Rullgård
2010-07-03 5:44 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-07-05 13:04 ` Maurus Cuelenaere
2010-07-05 13:23 ` Robert Schwebel
2010-07-05 13:31 ` Mike Rapoport
2010-07-05 13:42 ` Robert Schwebel
2010-07-05 14:15 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-07-06 5:36 ` Mike Rapoport
2010-07-05 13:53 ` Marek Vasut
2010-07-06 14:02 ` Pavel Machek
2010-07-03 19:48 ` Baruch Siach
2010-07-03 20:08 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2010-07-03 20:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-04 9:47 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2010-07-05 8:51 ` Colin Tuckley
2010-07-05 12:29 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2010-07-05 12:41 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2010-07-05 12:45 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2010-07-29 16:54 ` Robert Schwebel
2010-07-30 10:19 ` Richard Cochran
2010-07-30 11:40 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2010-08-19 5:36 ` shiraz hashim
2010-08-19 6:28 ` Robert Schwebel
2010-08-19 7:10 ` shiraz hashim [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-30 14:47 Tomasz Stanislawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTikUH6p+cc4hVhDLNjkCJxEOnFBw-z-+07MUiv_J@mail.gmail.com \
--to=shiraz.linux.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).