From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: shiraz.linux.kernel@gmail.com (shiraz hashim) Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:40:36 +0530 Subject: Some benchmarks on ARM In-Reply-To: <20100819062802.GG30096@pengutronix.de> References: <20100702180257.GA8767@pengutronix.de> <20100819062802.GG30096@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Thanks Robert, On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Robert Schwebel wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:06:04AM +0530, shiraz hashim wrote: >> > Here is a little article: >> > http://www.pengutronix.de/development/kernel/arm-benchmarks-20100702_en.html >> >> Thanks for this link, it was quite informative. Can you also please >> share the detailed report of lmbench tests which you run on these >> platforms. For example, average cpu bandwidth figures (as in bw_mem >> test) are not giving information on significant impact of caches and >> DDR. > > Please check the updated version of the article - the page you've linked > above contains a link at the top. The new version contains all the > commands which have been used. Now I see this, it is more clear. -- regards Shiraz Hashim