From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: eric.y.miao@gmail.com (Eric Miao)
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 16:37:16 +0800
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2] preliminary support for sparse IRQ
In-Reply-To: <20100520082853.GA18885@linux-sh.org>
References: <AANLkTikSXcn9nnvaVHAsoDPmLN30E_TjNVdXu1vCOH74@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100520082853.GA18885@linux-sh.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikVR8z_FqB4RvRWUIv2yNWw_p6gB9JQAeAMFQjq@mail.gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 06:34:49PM +0800, Eric Miao wrote:
>> commit 2e2e087d96630c95dbce57036680cf917e906cf1
>> Author: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
>> Date: ? Mon Dec 28 12:59:59 2009 +0800
>>
>> ? ? [ARM] preliminary support for sparse IRQ
>>
>> ? ? So to allow NR_IRQS to be dynamic and platforms to specify the number
>> ? ? of IRQs really needed.
>>
>> ? ? Signed-off-by: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
>>
> It would be nice to see this applied, we plan to use sparseirq
> unconditionally for shmobile (as sh already does).
>

Thanks Paul. Sounds like an Acked-by.