linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linus.ml.walleij@gmail.com (Linus Walleij)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] MMC: remove regulator refcount fiddling in mmc core
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 19:37:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikiPByvzfbj-gwfyozWb5MMJXSWuINFbrLdcwtU@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100625112232.GA21217@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

2010/6/25 Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 05:12:17PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
>> Currently the mmc_regulator_set_ocr() fiddles with the regulator
>> refcount by selectively calling regulator_[enable|disable]
>> depending on the state of the regulator. This will confuse the
>> reference count if case the regulator is for example shared with
>> other MMC slots or user for other stuff than the MMC card.
>
>> Push regulator_[enable|disable] out into the MMC host drivers
>> and remove this from the MMC core so the reference count can be
>> trusted.
>
> So, the feedback from folks at the time this was originally written was
> that the MMC code was unable to cope with sharing regulators since it
> really needs to be able to set specific voltages. ?This needn't be a
> showstopper since people can force a single voltage in the constraints
> but it does need to be considered here.

Well hm, that's not strictly true. If you only provide one standard
voltage ONLY in your OCR mask, i.e. MMC_VDD_* then you can use
the same regulator for two or more MMC cards.

Further that's a perfectly reasonable thing to do if you have e.g.
two embedded eMMC cards and you know which voltage they like
to operate on ... so share the same regulator, why not. The above
assumption comes from a slot-based world.

Another argument is that a function named
mmc_regulator_set_ocr() shouldn't be enabling/disabling regulators
anyway because it's hopeless to read the code, and the other
functions in mmc/core.c only deals with voltages, not on/off:ing.
(Maybe it's just me who have a hard time reading code like that.)

Yours,
Linus Walleij

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-26 17:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-24 15:12 [PATCH] MMC: remove regulator refcount fiddling in mmc core Linus Walleij
2010-06-25 11:22 ` Mark Brown
2010-06-26 17:37   ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2010-06-26 20:37     ` Mark Brown
2010-06-28  7:25 ` Adrian Hunter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AANLkTikiPByvzfbj-gwfyozWb5MMJXSWuINFbrLdcwtU@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=linus.ml.walleij@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).