From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: haojian.zhuang@gmail.com (Haojian Zhuang) Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 19:07:45 +0800 Subject: L2 cache support for pxa16x In-Reply-To: <1274438229.6926.73.camel@pe-dt434> References: <1273658181.6926.27.camel@pe-dt434> <1274350676.6926.58.camel@pe-dt434> <1274435046.6926.69.camel@pe-dt434> <1274438229.6926.73.camel@pe-dt434> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mmp/aspenite.c b/arch/arm/mach-mmp/aspenite.c > index a2d307e..d047d8c 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mmp/aspenite.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mmp/aspenite.c > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ > ?#include > ?#include > > +#include > ?#include > ?#include > ?#include > @@ -125,6 +126,7 @@ static struct pxa3xx_nand_platform_data > aspenite_nand_info = { > > ?static void __init common_init(void) > ?{ > + ? ? ? tauros2_init(); > ? ? ? ?mfp_config(ARRAY_AND_SIZE(common_pin_config)); > Why do you initialize L2 at here? I think that we should enable L2 a bit earlier. For example, in pxa168_init().