From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: rabin@rab.in (Rabin Vincent)
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:59:22 +0530
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/4] Patches for -next
In-Reply-To: <20100621144409.26309.87173.stgit@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
References: <20100621144409.26309.87173.stgit@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimFl8rOzipTjsJ39HyPQDkEjZeliKHssxyL4df6@mail.gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Catalin Marinas
<catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
> Pretty much the same content as v3 but I reordered the last three
> patches to make sure that switching to lazy cache flushing on ARMv7 SMP
> doesn't make the set_pte/cache flushing race more visible (issue handled
> by the set_pte_at patch).
>
>
> Catalin Marinas (4):
> ? ? ?ARM: Remove the domain switching on ARMv6k/v7 CPUs
> ? ? ?ARM: Assume new page cache pages have dirty D-cache
> ? ? ?ARM: Synchronise the I and D caches via set_pte_at() on SMP systems
> ? ? ?ARM: Use lazy cache flushing on ARMv7 SMP systems

I've tried patches 2, 3, and 4 on a Cortex-A9 SMP system and it resolves the
MMC rootfs init crash without the need for the flush_kernel_dcache_page()
change.

Tested-by: Rabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@stericsson.com>

Rabin

P.S.: Patch 1 (at least the version on your proposed branch), doesn't seem to
apply cleanly on linux-next.