From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kmpark@infradead.org (Kyungmin Park) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:30:03 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 0/5] ARM: S5PV210: Add support CPUFREQ for S5PV210/S5PC110 In-Reply-To: <03ca01cb5620$42a51b50$c7ef51f0$%kim@samsung.com> References: <1284537162-3129-1-git-send-email-jc.lee@samsung.com> <03ca01cb5620$42a51b50$c7ef51f0$%kim@samsung.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org 2010/9/17 Kukjin Kim : > Kyungmin Park wrote: >> >> First thank you for posting the patches. >> but I'm worry about sending the same feature patches from different > divisions. >> > It doesn't matter which division it is from. > What matters is the quality of the patch. > Any patches can be submitted anytime anywhere. > >> I'm not sure you're talking with kgene. but there are some codes >> posted by Mr. Ham and get feedback and reviewed with kgene. >> http://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-2.6- >> samsung/shortlog/refs/heads/cpufreq >> >> To kgene, >> One code from DMC(me), another code from System LSI(you). then which >> codes do you pick up and apply to mainline? > > As I said, it is not important where it is from. > I will apply the best patch. > >> and what's rules or principles? >> > The best patch will get merged. > And I think that's the purpose of mailing lists > - to put all ideas together and find the best solution. But no need to do same things. Look at the patches. do the same mistake, e.g., hard-corded values. but Mr. Ham's patch already fixed it and support full features. > > Thanks. > > Best regards, > Kgene. > -- > Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer, > SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in > the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at ?http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >