From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: srinidhikasagar@gmail.com (Srinidhi Kasagar) Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:17:43 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Common GIC entry macro code In-Reply-To: References: <20101110070043.18735.53764.sendpatchset@t400s> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Magnus Damm wrote: > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh > wrote: >>> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Common GIC entry macro code >>> >> I guess this was attempted by below patch as well. >> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=6284%2F1 >> >> 6284/1 in the RMKs patch system. This was also addressing OMAP and the >> patch was tested OK. > > Thanks for the pointer! Looks almost identical to what I just hacked > up. The main difference seems to be that the implementation in the > tracker depends on "gic_cpu_base_addr" which isn't used by all > sub-architectures. > >> Looks like it needs to be rebased because the state I see in the patch >> System is >> >> - - Note 2 submitted by Russell King on 02 Sep 2010 15:43:12 (UTC) - - - >> Moved to Discarded. >> >> Doesn't apply: > > Ironically enough it looks like it was the omap2 bits that didn't > apply properly. > > If I don't hear anything then I'll just resend my patch to the > tracker. If the other implementation gets merged sooner then that's > even better - having some code to share is much better than > duplicating the same code again and again. If you rebase to the discarded one in tracker, I would be happy. Anyway Acked-by: Srinidhi Kasagar Srinidhi