From: linus.ml.walleij@gmail.com (Linus Walleij)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] nomadik: prevent sched_clock() wraparound
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:15:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimvyo-2eHrvU=LNdBjrJfAxv9Jpza8Mh4iG4ts6@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1289940829.3860.22.camel@localhost.localdomain>
2010/11/16 john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>:
> On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 10:11 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> The cycle value being passed as v is likely to be large, and the
> clocksource mult and shift are calculated to be as large as possible
> without overflowing when given only a few seconds worth of cycles.
>
> So its very likely that after a few seconds of running (or even less,
> with the 32_to_63 conversion), the cyc2ns function will overflow, as
> v*mult will be greater then 64bits.
Darn you're right of course.
I'll attempt to use
clocks_calc_mult_shift(&mult, &shift, rate, NSEC_PER_SEC, 3600*24*365);
For getting a somewhat more proper mult+shift for sched_clock().
>> + ? ? mod_timer(&cnt32_to_63_keepwarm_timer, round_jiffies(jiffies + data));
>> + ? ? (void) sched_clock();
>
> Also, just FYI: This can be problematic on PREEMPT_RT systems, where
> timers can be delayed by high priority processes hogging the cpu.
Hm is there a proper remedy for this? The watchdog in kernel/watchdog.c
creates a HRtimer based thread, SCHED_FIFO and prio MAX_RT_PRIO-1
is that what you should do for the ultimate sched_clock()
cnt32_to_63 guard?
In that case this is ripe for breaking out into a separate helper
somewhere, like a callable
setup_cnt32_to_63_guard_timer(max_rate, sched_clock);
Yours,
Linus Walleij
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-16 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-16 9:11 [PATCH] nomadik: prevent sched_clock() wraparound Linus Walleij
2010-11-16 20:53 ` john stultz
2010-11-16 22:15 ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2010-11-16 22:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-17 8:34 ` Linus Walleij
2010-11-17 8:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-17 15:15 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-11-17 9:26 ` Linus Walleij
2010-11-17 15:04 ` Nicolas Pitre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTimvyo-2eHrvU=LNdBjrJfAxv9Jpza8Mh4iG4ts6@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=linus.ml.walleij@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).