linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: torvalds@linux-foundation.org (Linus Torvalds)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Update MSM maintainers
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:10:46 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTin8kQbCODofWv15P=UiFkh2RGAAAqMiF0MuHc9c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D66CDD4.7080103@codeaurora.org>

On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
>        ?Please let the MSM developers take full
> responsibility for the MSM architecture. ?That is, after all, what the
> community typically asks from SOC vendors.

Actually, "the community" (not that there really is any such cohesive
thing) generally asks that vendors be "involved". Not that vendors be
"exclusively in control". There's a big difference.

So what I personally find distasteful is how there's apparently some
entity that argues that _others_ should be removed from the
maintainership. Why would that be the case? This kind of exclusivity
argument is bad. Maintainers can step down, but having others remove
maintainership seems dubious at best.

So get your politics sorted out, guys.

                               Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-24 22:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-23  0:03 [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Update MSM maintainers David Brown
2011-02-23  0:19 ` Daniel Walker
2011-02-23  1:12   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-23 21:26     ` Bryan Huntsman
2011-02-24  2:02       ` Daniel Walker
2011-02-24 21:29         ` Bryan Huntsman
2011-02-24 22:10           ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2011-03-04 15:36           ` Pavel Machek
2011-03-04 17:06             ` David Brown
2011-02-23  0:33 ` Bryan Huntsman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='AANLkTin8kQbCODofWv15P=UiFkh2RGAAAqMiF0MuHc9c@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).