Merge request of s5pc210 universal board.

[kmpark@infradead.org (Kyungmin Park)]

On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
> Kyungmin Park wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> wrote:
>> >> Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Dear all,
>> >>>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >>> Now I checked the next-v310 tree and know that only LSI required codes
>> >>> are merged.
>> >>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-
>> >>> samsung.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next-s5pv310
>> >>>
>> >>> I can't find any reason to omit the universal board file. It's posted
>> >>> before merge window and no difference with LSI SMDK board at current
>> >>> status.
>> >>
>> >> Please answer my concern..I already replied to you about this.
>> >>
>> >>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-July/022087.html
>> >> ---
>> >>> >> +config MACH_UNIVERSAL
>> >>> >
>> >>> > As I still asking, do you _really_ want to use 'UNIVERSAL' as the
>> >>> > board(machine) name?
>> >>>
>> >>> Yes, it's called 'universal' and it's really universal board at here.
>> >>> I don't confuse the engineer who develop this board.
>> >>> Maybe your engineers saw and hear the brief description about
> universal
>> >> board.
>> >>>
>> >> Actually, I know that. But there are S5PC100, S5PC110 universal board
>> >> also...
>> >> So I asked to you that you _really_ want to use 'universal' here...and
> I'm
>> >> still concerning.
>> >
>> > No comment means "Of course want to merge it". thank you for your
>> > concerning. but I can handle it.
>>
> Hi,
>
>> After discuss with Mr. Kim. I changed to use non-generic name to
> universal_c210.
>>
> Thanks for your understanding...IMHO, 'MACH_UNIVERSAL_C210' is quite long...
> If you don't mind, how about 'MACH_UNI_C210' or 'MACH_UNIC210'...but it
> depends on your decision.

FYI: These are also candidates but my team voted and decide to use it.

>
>> Then do you resend the patch? or can you handle it by yourself?
>>
> I will apply this with changing it.
Thanks
>
>> To Russell.
>> Sorry for bothering you.
>> Can you change the registered universal to universal_c210?
>> universal_c210 ? ? ? ? ?MACH_UNIVERSAL_C210 ? ? UNIVERSAL_C210
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Kyungmin Park
>> >
>> >> ---
>> >>
>> >>> I try to support our board at mainline kernel but it seems to make a
>> >>> difficult with unknown commit criteria of LSI.
>> >>>
>> >>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Kgene.
> --
> Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
> SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
>
>