* Merge request of s5pc210 universal board. @ 2010-08-06 4:35 Kyungmin Park 2010-08-06 4:43 ` Kukjin Kim 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Kyungmin Park @ 2010-08-06 4:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Dear all, Now I checked the next-v310 tree and know that only LSI required codes are merged. http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next-s5pv310 I can't find any reason to omit the universal board file. It's posted before merge window and no difference with LSI SMDK board at current status. I try to support our board at mainline kernel but it seems to make a difficult with unknown commit criteria of LSI. Thank you, Kyungmin Park ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Merge request of s5pc210 universal board. 2010-08-06 4:35 Merge request of s5pc210 universal board Kyungmin Park @ 2010-08-06 4:43 ` Kukjin Kim 2010-08-06 4:47 ` Kyungmin Park 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Kukjin Kim @ 2010-08-06 4:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Kyungmin Park wrote: > > Dear all, > Hi, > Now I checked the next-v310 tree and know that only LSI required codes > are merged. > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux- > samsung.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next-s5pv310 > > I can't find any reason to omit the universal board file. It's posted > before merge window and no difference with LSI SMDK board at current > status. Please answer my concern..I already replied to you about this. http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-July/022087.html --- > >> +config MACH_UNIVERSAL > > > > As I still asking, do you _really_ want to use 'UNIVERSAL' as the > > board(machine) name? > > Yes, it's called 'universal' and it's really universal board at here. > I don't confuse the engineer who develop this board. > Maybe your engineers saw and hear the brief description about universal board. > Actually, I know that. But there are S5PC100, S5PC110 universal board also... So I asked to you that you _really_ want to use 'universal' here...and I'm still concerning. --- > I try to support our board at mainline kernel but it seems to make a > difficult with unknown commit criteria of LSI. > Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Merge request of s5pc210 universal board. 2010-08-06 4:43 ` Kukjin Kim @ 2010-08-06 4:47 ` Kyungmin Park 2010-08-06 6:24 ` Kyungmin Park 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Kyungmin Park @ 2010-08-06 4:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote: > Kyungmin Park wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> > Hi, > >> Now I checked the next-v310 tree and know that only LSI required codes >> are merged. >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux- >> samsung.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next-s5pv310 >> >> I can't find any reason to omit the universal board file. It's posted >> before merge window and no difference with LSI SMDK board at current >> status. > > Please answer my concern..I already replied to you about this. > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-July/022087.html > --- >> >> +config MACH_UNIVERSAL >> > >> > As I still asking, do you _really_ want to use 'UNIVERSAL' as the >> > board(machine) name? >> >> Yes, it's called 'universal' and it's really universal board at here. >> I don't confuse the engineer who develop this board. >> Maybe your engineers saw and hear the brief description about universal > board. >> > Actually, I know that. But there are S5PC100, S5PC110 universal board > also... > So I asked to you that you _really_ want to use 'universal' here...and I'm > still concerning. No comment means "Of course want to merge it". thank you for your concerning. but I can handle it. > --- > >> I try to support our board at mainline kernel but it seems to make a >> difficult with unknown commit criteria of LSI. >> > > Thanks. > > Best regards, > Kgene. > -- > Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer, > SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Merge request of s5pc210 universal board. 2010-08-06 4:47 ` Kyungmin Park @ 2010-08-06 6:24 ` Kyungmin Park 2010-08-06 7:11 ` Kukjin Kim 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Kyungmin Park @ 2010-08-06 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote: >> Kyungmin Park wrote: >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >> Hi, >> >>> Now I checked the next-v310 tree and know that only LSI required codes >>> are merged. >>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux- >>> samsung.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next-s5pv310 >>> >>> I can't find any reason to omit the universal board file. It's posted >>> before merge window and no difference with LSI SMDK board at current >>> status. >> >> Please answer my concern..I already replied to you about this. >> >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-July/022087.html >> --- >>> >> +config MACH_UNIVERSAL >>> > >>> > As I still asking, do you _really_ want to use 'UNIVERSAL' as the >>> > board(machine) name? >>> >>> Yes, it's called 'universal' and it's really universal board at here. >>> I don't confuse the engineer who develop this board. >>> Maybe your engineers saw and hear the brief description about universal >> board. >>> >> Actually, I know that. But there are S5PC100, S5PC110 universal board >> also... >> So I asked to you that you _really_ want to use 'universal' here...and I'm >> still concerning. > > No comment means "Of course want to merge it". thank you for your > concerning. but I can handle it. After discuss with Mr. Kim. I changed to use non-generic name to universal_c210. Then do you resend the patch? or can you handle it by yourself? To Russell. Sorry for bothering you. Can you change the registered universal to universal_c210? universal_c210 MACH_UNIVERSAL_C210 UNIVERSAL_C210 Thank you, Kyungmin Park > >> --- >> >>> I try to support our board at mainline kernel but it seems to make a >>> difficult with unknown commit criteria of LSI. >>> >> >> Thanks. >> >> Best regards, >> Kgene. >> -- >> Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer, >> SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. >> >> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Merge request of s5pc210 universal board. 2010-08-06 6:24 ` Kyungmin Park @ 2010-08-06 7:11 ` Kukjin Kim 2010-08-06 7:22 ` Kyungmin Park 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Kukjin Kim @ 2010-08-06 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Kyungmin Park wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote: > >> Kyungmin Park wrote: > >>> > >>> Dear all, > >>> > >> Hi, > >> > >>> Now I checked the next-v310 tree and know that only LSI required codes > >>> are merged. > >>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux- > >>> samsung.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next-s5pv310 > >>> > >>> I can't find any reason to omit the universal board file. It's posted > >>> before merge window and no difference with LSI SMDK board at current > >>> status. > >> > >> Please answer my concern..I already replied to you about this. > >> > >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-July/022087.html > >> --- > >>> >> +config MACH_UNIVERSAL > >>> > > >>> > As I still asking, do you _really_ want to use 'UNIVERSAL' as the > >>> > board(machine) name? > >>> > >>> Yes, it's called 'universal' and it's really universal board at here. > >>> I don't confuse the engineer who develop this board. > >>> Maybe your engineers saw and hear the brief description about universal > >> board. > >>> > >> Actually, I know that. But there are S5PC100, S5PC110 universal board > >> also... > >> So I asked to you that you _really_ want to use 'universal' here...and I'm > >> still concerning. > > > > No comment means "Of course want to merge it". thank you for your > > concerning. but I can handle it. > Hi, > After discuss with Mr. Kim. I changed to use non-generic name to universal_c210. > Thanks for your understanding...IMHO, 'MACH_UNIVERSAL_C210' is quite long... If you don't mind, how about 'MACH_UNI_C210' or 'MACH_UNIC210'...but it depends on your decision. > Then do you resend the patch? or can you handle it by yourself? > I will apply this with changing it. > To Russell. > Sorry for bothering you. > Can you change the registered universal to universal_c210? > universal_c210 MACH_UNIVERSAL_C210 UNIVERSAL_C210 > > Thank you, > Kyungmin Park > > > >> --- > >> > >>> I try to support our board at mainline kernel but it seems to make a > >>> difficult with unknown commit criteria of LSI. > >>> > >> Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Merge request of s5pc210 universal board. 2010-08-06 7:11 ` Kukjin Kim @ 2010-08-06 7:22 ` Kyungmin Park 2010-08-06 11:53 ` Kyungmin Park 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Kyungmin Park @ 2010-08-06 7:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote: > Kyungmin Park wrote: >> >> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> > wrote: >> > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> > wrote: >> >> Kyungmin Park wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Dear all, >> >>> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >>> Now I checked the next-v310 tree and know that only LSI required codes >> >>> are merged. >> >>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux- >> >>> samsung.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next-s5pv310 >> >>> >> >>> I can't find any reason to omit the universal board file. It's posted >> >>> before merge window and no difference with LSI SMDK board at current >> >>> status. >> >> >> >> Please answer my concern..I already replied to you about this. >> >> >> >> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-July/022087.html >> >> --- >> >>> >> +config MACH_UNIVERSAL >> >>> > >> >>> > As I still asking, do you _really_ want to use 'UNIVERSAL' as the >> >>> > board(machine) name? >> >>> >> >>> Yes, it's called 'universal' and it's really universal board at here. >> >>> I don't confuse the engineer who develop this board. >> >>> Maybe your engineers saw and hear the brief description about > universal >> >> board. >> >>> >> >> Actually, I know that. But there are S5PC100, S5PC110 universal board >> >> also... >> >> So I asked to you that you _really_ want to use 'universal' here...and > I'm >> >> still concerning. >> > >> > No comment means "Of course want to merge it". thank you for your >> > concerning. but I can handle it. >> > Hi, > >> After discuss with Mr. Kim. I changed to use non-generic name to > universal_c210. >> > Thanks for your understanding...IMHO, 'MACH_UNIVERSAL_C210' is quite long... > If you don't mind, how about 'MACH_UNI_C210' or 'MACH_UNIC210'...but it > depends on your decision. FYI: These are also candidates but my team voted and decide to use it. > >> Then do you resend the patch? or can you handle it by yourself? >> > I will apply this with changing it. Thanks > >> To Russell. >> Sorry for bothering you. >> Can you change the registered universal to universal_c210? >> universal_c210 ? ? ? ? ?MACH_UNIVERSAL_C210 ? ? UNIVERSAL_C210 >> >> Thank you, >> Kyungmin Park >> > >> >> --- >> >> >> >>> I try to support our board at mainline kernel but it seems to make a >> >>> difficult with unknown commit criteria of LSI. >> >>> >> >> > > > Thanks. > > Best regards, > Kgene. > -- > Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer, > SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Merge request of s5pc210 universal board. 2010-08-06 7:22 ` Kyungmin Park @ 2010-08-06 11:53 ` Kyungmin Park 2010-08-06 11:57 ` Kukjin Kim 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Kyungmin Park @ 2010-08-06 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote: >> Kyungmin Park wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> >> wrote: >>> > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> >> wrote: >>> >> Kyungmin Park wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> >>> >> Hi, >>> >> >>> >>> Now I checked the next-v310 tree and know that only LSI required codes >>> >>> are merged. >>> >>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux- >>> >>> samsung.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next-s5pv310 >>> >>> >>> >>> I can't find any reason to omit the universal board file. It's posted >>> >>> before merge window and no difference with LSI SMDK board at current >>> >>> status. >>> >> >>> >> Please answer my concern..I already replied to you about this. >>> >> >>> >> >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-July/022087.html >>> >> --- >>> >>> >> +config MACH_UNIVERSAL >>> >>> > >>> >>> > As I still asking, do you _really_ want to use 'UNIVERSAL' as the >>> >>> > board(machine) name? >>> >>> >>> >>> Yes, it's called 'universal' and it's really universal board at here. >>> >>> I don't confuse the engineer who develop this board. >>> >>> Maybe your engineers saw and hear the brief description about >> universal >>> >> board. >>> >>> >>> >> Actually, I know that. But there are S5PC100, S5PC110 universal board >>> >> also... >>> >> So I asked to you that you _really_ want to use 'universal' here...and >> I'm >>> >> still concerning. >>> > >>> > No comment means "Of course want to merge it". thank you for your >>> > concerning. but I can handle it. >>> >> Hi, >> >>> After discuss with Mr. Kim. I changed to use non-generic name to >> universal_c210. >>> >> Thanks for your understanding...IMHO, 'MACH_UNIVERSAL_C210' is quite long... >> If you don't mind, how about 'MACH_UNI_C210' or 'MACH_UNIC210'...but it >> depends on your decision. > > FYI: These are also candidates but my team voted and decide to use it. > >> >>> Then do you resend the patch? or can you handle it by yourself? >>> >> I will apply this with changing it. Please modify the machine ID only. I want to use the universal prefix at variables as is. Thank you, Kyungmin Park > Thanks >> >>> To Russell. >>> Sorry for bothering you. >>> Can you change the registered universal to universal_c210? >>> universal_c210 ? ? ? ? ?MACH_UNIVERSAL_C210 ? ? UNIVERSAL_C210 >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Kyungmin Park >>> > >>> >> --- >>> >> >>> >>> I try to support our board at mainline kernel but it seems to make a >>> >>> difficult with unknown commit criteria of LSI. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> Best regards, >> Kgene. >> -- >> Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer, >> SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. >> >> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Merge request of s5pc210 universal board. 2010-08-06 11:53 ` Kyungmin Park @ 2010-08-06 11:57 ` Kukjin Kim 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Kukjin Kim @ 2010-08-06 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Kyungmin Park wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote: > >> Kyungmin Park wrote: > >>> > >>> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> > >> wrote: > >>> > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> > >> wrote: > >>> >> Kyungmin Park wrote: > >>> >>> > >>> >>> Dear all, > >>> >>> > >>> >> Hi, > >>> >> > >>> >>> Now I checked the next-v310 tree and know that only LSI required codes > >>> >>> are merged. > >>> >>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux- > >>> >>> samsung.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next-s5pv310 > >>> >>> > >>> >>> I can't find any reason to omit the universal board file. It's posted > >>> >>> before merge window and no difference with LSI SMDK board at current > >>> >>> status. > >>> >> > >>> >> Please answer my concern..I already replied to you about this. > >>> >> > >>> >> > >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-July/022087.html > >>> >> --- > >>> >>> >> +config MACH_UNIVERSAL > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > As I still asking, do you _really_ want to use 'UNIVERSAL' as the > >>> >>> > board(machine) name? > >>> >>> > >>> >>> Yes, it's called 'universal' and it's really universal board at here. > >>> >>> I don't confuse the engineer who develop this board. > >>> >>> Maybe your engineers saw and hear the brief description about > >> universal > >>> >> board. > >>> >>> > >>> >> Actually, I know that. But there are S5PC100, S5PC110 universal board > >>> >> also... > >>> >> So I asked to you that you _really_ want to use 'universal' here...and > >> I'm > >>> >> still concerning. > >>> > > >>> > No comment means "Of course want to merge it". thank you for your > >>> > concerning. but I can handle it. > >>> > >> Hi, > >> > >>> After discuss with Mr. Kim. I changed to use non-generic name to > >> universal_c210. > >>> > >> Thanks for your understanding...IMHO, 'MACH_UNIVERSAL_C210' is quite > long... > >> If you don't mind, how about 'MACH_UNI_C210' or 'MACH_UNIC210'...but it > >> depends on your decision. > > > > FYI: These are also candidates but my team voted and decide to use it. > > > >> > >>> Then do you resend the patch? or can you handle it by yourself? > >>> > >> I will apply this with changing it. > Please modify the machine ID only. I want to use the universal prefix > at variables as is. > Ah...just now submitted with changing every stuff... ..ok...will update it ;-) > Thank you, > Kyungmin Park > > Thanks > >> > >>> To Russell. > >>> Sorry for bothering you. > >>> Can you change the registered universal to universal_c210? > >>> universal_c210 ? ? ? ? ?MACH_UNIVERSAL_C210 ? ? UNIVERSAL_C210 > > >>> > >>> Thank you, > >>> Kyungmin Park > >>> > > >>> >> --- > >>> >> > >>> >>> I try to support our board at mainline kernel but it seems to make a > >>> >>> difficult with unknown commit criteria of LSI. > >>> >>> > >>> >> > >> Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-06 11:57 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-08-06 4:35 Merge request of s5pc210 universal board Kyungmin Park 2010-08-06 4:43 ` Kukjin Kim 2010-08-06 4:47 ` Kyungmin Park 2010-08-06 6:24 ` Kyungmin Park 2010-08-06 7:11 ` Kukjin Kim 2010-08-06 7:22 ` Kyungmin Park 2010-08-06 11:53 ` Kyungmin Park 2010-08-06 11:57 ` Kukjin Kim
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).