[PATCH 1/1] ARM: pxa168: fix corrected reset vector

[haojian.zhuang@gmail.com (Haojian Zhuang)]

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Mark F. Brown <mark.brown314@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Haojian Zhuang
> <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Mark F. Brown <mark.brown314@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:48 AM, Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Mark F. Brown <mark.brown314@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Mark F. Brown <mark.brown314@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> ?arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/system.h | ? ?2 +-
>>>>>>> ?1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/system.h b/arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/system.h
>>>>>>> index 4f5b0e0..926e9c0 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/system.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/system.h
>>>>>>> @@ -16,6 +16,6 @@ static inline void arch_idle(void)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ?static inline void arch_reset(char mode, const char *cmd)
>>>>>>> ?{
>>>>>>> - ? ? ? cpu_reset(0);
>>>>>>> + ? ? ? cpu_reset(0xffff0000);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not sure if this correct. But normally reset jump happens after we turn
>>>>>> off the MMU and so on. Ain't the BootROM starts from 0 ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ?}
>>>>>>> ?#endif /* __ASM_MACH_SYSTEM_H */
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> 1.7.0.4
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Eric, the boot-rom for pxa168 starts at 0xffff_0000. I am pretty sure
>>>>> about that! If you set the reset vector to 0x0 it will crash during
>>>>> reboot. I will send you xdb snapshots if you need me to.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> OK, you are expert on this :-)
>>>>
>>>> Applied to 'fix'.
>>>>
>>>
>>> One moment. Since this is really global to pxa910 and mmp2, so I
>>> suggest this being fixed for pxa168 only first. How about this:
>>>
>>> ? ?ARM: pxa168: fix corrected reset vector
>>>
>>> ? ?Reset vector for pxa168 is 0xffff_0000 not 0x0. This fix allows
>>> ? ?reboot to work
>>>
>>> ? ?Signed-off-by: Mark F. Brown <mark.brown314@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/system.h
>>> b/arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/system.h
>>> index 4f5b0e0..1a8a25e 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/system.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/system.h
>>> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
>>> ?#ifndef __ASM_MACH_SYSTEM_H
>>> ?#define __ASM_MACH_SYSTEM_H
>>>
>>> +#include <mach/cputype.h>
>>> +
>>> ?static inline void arch_idle(void)
>>> ?{
>>> ? ? ? ?cpu_do_idle();
>>> @@ -16,6 +18,9 @@ static inline void arch_idle(void)
>>>
>>> ?static inline void arch_reset(char mode, const char *cmd)
>>> ?{
>>> - ? ? ? cpu_reset(0);
>>> + ? ? ? if (cpu_is_pxa168())
>>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? cpu_reset(0xffff0000);
>>> + ? ? ? else
>>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? cpu_reset(0);
>>> ?}
>>> ?#endif /* __ASM_MACH_SYSTEM_H */
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at ?http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>> Please read the FAQ at ?http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>>
>> The reset code is in below.
>>
>> ? ? ? ?.align ?5
>> ENTRY(cpu_mohawk_reset)
>> ? ? ? ?mov ? ? ip, #0
>> ? ? ? ?mcr ? ? p15, 0, ip, c7, c7, 0 ? ? ? ? ? @ invalidate I,D caches
>> ? ? ? ?mcr ? ? p15, 0, ip, c7, c10, 4 ? ? ? ? ?@ drain WB
>> ? ? ? ?mcr ? ? p15, 0, ip, c8, c7, 0 ? ? ? ? ? @ invalidate I & D TLBs
>> ? ? ? ?mrc ? ? p15, 0, ip, c1, c0, 0 ? ? ? ? ? @ ctrl register
>> ? ? ? ?bic ? ? ip, ip, #0x0007 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? @ .............cam
>> ? ? ? ?bic ? ? ip, ip, #0x1100 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? @ ...i...s........
>> ? ? ? ?mcr ? ? p15, 0, ip, c1, c0, 0 ? ? ? ? ? @ ctrl register
>> ? ? ? ?mov ? ? pc, r0
>>
>> MMU is disabled at here and replace PC with r0 value. I doubt code
>> executed correctly at here. While MMU is disabled, the PC should be
>> continue in the range of 0xCxxx_xxxx (kernel space). "mov pc, r0"
>> shouldn't be executed. Instruction fetch failure should occurs since
>> there's no physical address in 0xCxxx_xxxx.
>>
>> Correct me if I'm wrong.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Haojian
>>
>
> Haojian,
>
> I think there is a pipeline execution of the mov pc, r0 instruction.
> If I remember correctly you need to do a similar jump when you turn
> the MMU on in early boot code. If it makes any difference I did test
> this code on pxa168 before submitting it. I will double check the mmp2
> and the pxa910 reset vectors with the Boot ROM developers.
>

In early boot code, 1:1 (physical:virtual) mapping is used. It means
that physical address is same as virtual address. So you can operature
mmu as you wish.

By the way, I don't suggest to reset CPU by this way. Reset is not
only make code running from the head, it should also clear registers
and RTL logic in CPU.