From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: felipe.contreras@gmail.com (Felipe Contreras) Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 22:03:20 +0300 Subject: [PATCH v2 00/17] omap: mailbox: reorganize init In-Reply-To: References: <1273849310-32169-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > Hi Felipe, > > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Felipe Contreras > wrote: >> The main purpose of this patch series is to be able to compile mach platform >> data as built-in. Otherwise, client modules such as bridgedriver will load the >> platform code, but not the mach code when mailbox is built as a module. >> >> Unfortunately, there's no easy way to do that since plat and mach code are >> deepely interrelated. So the first patches try to separate the mailbox >> registering through a defined omap_mbox_platform_data. > > Have you considered converting mailbox to hwmod + omap_device ? I don't know what's that... so no. Is there any good source of information, or a good example? I think there is further tidying up possible after this patch series independent of that, but I would like to concentrate on getting this in first. -- Felipe Contreras