From: linus.walleij@linaro.org (Linus Walleij)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mmci: sync DATAEND irq with dma transfer done
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 22:11:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=4V8DuDyuWeHGPXy_h+aH7YUdXMw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=u95J5vMrSGQN45=eiQEWGNffv_g@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com> wrote:
> Okay, but can't we have something like this then in the unmap function:
>
> ? ? ? for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? status = readl(host->base + MMCISTATUS);
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (host->unreliable_rxflags) {
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (host->dataend)
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?break;
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? } else if (!(status & MCI_RXDATAAVLBLMASK))
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? break;
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? udelay(10);
> ? ? ? }
>
> to minimize the changes and apparently address Russell's concern as well?
Yes that was exactly my suggestion in my first reply to Russell,
sorry if that wasn't clear. I called it bool sync_dma_job
The problem is that this HW bug is very likely present also in
unmodified ARM IP blocks, the only reason noone is seing it
is that they don't clock them very high and DMA is not really
working on them for other reasons anyway.
I.e. all versions of MMCI are likely as unreliable...
Yours,
Linus Walleij
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-20 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-19 9:02 [PATCH] mmci: sync DATAEND irq with dma transfer done Linus Walleij
2011-04-19 9:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-19 12:00 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-19 12:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-20 16:29 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-20 16:46 ` Vitaly Wool
2011-04-20 17:17 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-20 17:58 ` Vitaly Wool
2011-04-20 20:11 ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2011-04-28 17:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-28 22:24 ` Martin Furmanski
2011-05-11 20:13 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-29 12:44 ` Ulf Hansson
2011-04-29 13:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-06 8:13 ` Ulf Hansson
2011-05-12 8:36 ` Per Forlin
2011-05-12 13:15 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTi=4V8DuDyuWeHGPXy_h+aH7YUdXMw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).