From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ccross@android.com (Colin Cross) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 11:41:41 -0700 Subject: [PATCHv2 4/4] ARM: tegra: irq: Add tegra_eoi In-Reply-To: <1304414973.27863.2.camel@e102144-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1304284213-11950-5-git-send-email-ccross@android.com> <1304288854-11011-1-git-send-email-ccross@android.com> <1304414973.27863.2.camel@e102144-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:29 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Colin, > > On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 23:27 +0100, Colin Cross wrote: >> Implement irq_eoi to allow the GIC irq chip flow controller to >> be changed to fasteoi. >> >> Signed-off-by: Colin Cross >> --- >> v2: Add tegra_eoi without removing tegra_ack, patch can now be >> ? ? merged safely before Will Deacon's gic fasteoi patch >> >> ?arch/arm/mach-tegra/irq.c | ? ?9 +++++++++ >> ?1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/irq.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/irq.c >> index da17491..4956c3c 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/irq.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/irq.c >> @@ -95,6 +95,14 @@ static void tegra_ack(struct irq_data *d) >> ? ? ? ? tegra_irq_write_mask(d->irq, ICTLR_CPU_IEP_FIR_CLR); >> ?} >> >> +static void tegra_eoi(struct irq_data *d) >> +{ >> + ? ? ? if (d->irq < FIRST_LEGACY_IRQ) >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return; >> + >> + ? ? ? tegra_irq_write_mask(d->irq, ICTLR_CPU_IEP_FIR_CLR); >> +} >> + >> ?static int tegra_retrigger(struct irq_data *d) >> ?{ >> ? ? ? ? if (d->irq < FIRST_LEGACY_IRQ) >> @@ -116,6 +124,7 @@ void __init tegra_init_irq(void) >> ? ? ? ? } >> >> ? ? ? ? gic_arch_extn.irq_ack = tegra_ack; >> + ? ? ? gic_arch_extn.irq_eoi = tegra_eoi; >> ? ? ? ? gic_arch_extn.irq_mask = tegra_mask; >> ? ? ? ? gic_arch_extn.irq_unmask = tegra_unmask; >> ? ? ? ? gic_arch_extn.irq_retrigger = tegra_retrigger; >> -- >> 1.7.4.1 > > Just the job! > > Acked-by: Will Deacon > > Thanks, > > Will > > What is your plan for merging the fasteoi patches? If you are planning to put them in 2.6.40, can you pull these patches into your tree? I don't have any other Tegra changes planned for 2.6.40, so they shouldn't cause conflicts later.