From: vincent.guittot@linaro.org (Vincent Guittot)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC] Add Arm cpu topology definition
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:30:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=mQFTbvsbN4S45D3r2vbYgD2iOAQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110616114847.GB2444@matterhorn1>
On 16 June 2011 13:48, Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 11 Jun 16, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> The affinity between Arm processors is defined in the MPIDR register.
>> We can identify which processors are in the same cluster,
>> and which ones have performance interdependency. The cpu topology
>> ?of an Arm platform can be set thanks to this register and this topology
>> is then used by sched_mc and sched_smt.
>
> Probably worth adding a note that sched_mc/sched_smt are disabled by default
> and need to be enabled by writing to their respective sysfs files.
>
ok
>> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> ?arch/arm/Kconfig ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? 26 ++++++++
>> ?arch/arm/include/asm/topology.h | ? 33 ++++++++++
>> ?arch/arm/kernel/Makefile ? ? ? ?| ? ?1 +
>> ?arch/arm/kernel/smp.c ? ? ? ? ? | ? ?6 ++
>> ?arch/arm/kernel/topology.c ? ? ?| ?133 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> ?5 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> ?create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> index 9adc278..bacf9af 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> @@ -219,6 +219,24 @@ source "kernel/Kconfig.freezer"
>>
>> ?menu "System Type"
>>
>> +config SCHED_MC
>> + ? ? bool "Multi-core scheduler support"
>> + ? ? depends on SMP && ARM_CPU_TOPOLOGY
>> + ? ? default n
>> + ? ? help
>> + ? ? ? Multi-core scheduler support improves the CPU scheduler's decision
>> + ? ? ? making when dealing with multi-core CPU chips at a cost of slightly
>> + ? ? ? increased overhead in some places. If unsure say N here.
>> +
>> +config SCHED_SMT
>> + ? ? bool "SMT scheduler support"
>> + ? ? depends on SMP && ARM_CPU_TOPOLOGY
>> + ? ? default n
>> + ? ? help
>> + ? ? ? Improves the CPU scheduler's decision making when dealing with
>> + ? ? ? MultiThreading at a cost of slightly increased overhead in some
>> + ? ? ? places. If unsure say N here.
>> +
>> ?config MMU
>> ? ? ? bool "MMU-based Paged Memory Management Support"
>> ? ? ? default y
>> @@ -1062,6 +1080,14 @@ if !MMU
>> ?source "arch/arm/Kconfig-nommu"
>> ?endif
>>
>> +config ARM_CPU_TOPOLOGY
>> + ? ? bool "Support cpu topology definition"
>> + ? ? depends on SMP && CPU_V7
>> + ? ? help
>> + ? ? ? Support Arm cpu topology definition. The MPIDR register defines
>> + ? ? ? affinity between processors which is used to set the cpu
>> + ? ? ? topology of an Arm System.
>> +
>> ?config ARM_ERRATA_411920
>> ? ? ? bool "ARM errata: Invalidation of the Instruction Cache operation can fail"
>> ? ? ? depends on CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/topology.h
>> index accbd7c..cb90d0a 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/topology.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/topology.h
>> @@ -1,6 +1,39 @@
>> ?#ifndef _ASM_ARM_TOPOLOGY_H
>> ?#define _ASM_ARM_TOPOLOGY_H
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CPU_TOPOLOGY
>> +
>> +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
>> +
>> +struct cputopo_arm {
>> + ? ? int thread_id;
>> + ? ? int core_id;
>> + ? ? int socket_id;
>> + ? ? cpumask_t thread_sibling;
>> + ? ? cpumask_t core_sibling;
>> +};
>> +
>> +extern struct cputopo_arm cpu_topology[NR_CPUS];
>> +
>> +#define topology_physical_package_id(cpu) ? ?(cpu_topology[cpu].socket_id)
>> +#define topology_core_id(cpu) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(cpu_topology[cpu].core_id)
>> +#define topology_core_cpumask(cpu) ? (&(cpu_topology[cpu].core_sibling))
>> +#define topology_thread_cpumask(cpu) (&(cpu_topology[cpu].thread_sibling))
>> +
>> +#define mc_capable() (cpu_topology[0].socket_id != -1)
>> +#define smt_capable() ? ? ? ?(cpu_topology[0].thread_id != -1)
>> +
>> +void init_cpu_topology(void);
>> +void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid);
>> +const struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(unsigned int cpu);
>> +
>> +#else
>> +
>> +#define init_cpu_topology() {};
>> +#define store_cpu_topology(cpuid) {};
>> +
>> +#endif
>> +
>> ?#include <asm-generic/topology.h>
>>
>> ?#endif /* _ASM_ARM_TOPOLOGY_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile b/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
>> index a5b31af..816a481 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
>> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_IWMMXT) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?+= iwmmxt.o
>> ?obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_HAS_PMU) ? ?+= pmu.o
>> ?obj-$(CONFIG_HW_PERF_EVENTS) += perf_event.o
>> ?AFLAGS_iwmmxt.o ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?:= -Wa,-mcpu=iwmmxt
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_CPU_TOPOLOGY) ?+= topology.o
>>
>> ?ifneq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_EBSA110),y)
>> ? ?obj-y ? ? ? ? ? ? ?+= io.o
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
>> index 344e52b..3e8dc3b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
>> ?#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>> ?#include <asm/cpu.h>
>> ?#include <asm/cputype.h>
>> +#include <asm/topology.h>
>> ?#include <asm/mmu_context.h>
>> ?#include <asm/pgtable.h>
>> ?#include <asm/pgalloc.h>
>> @@ -268,6 +269,9 @@ static void __cpuinit smp_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpuid)
>> ? ? ? struct cpuinfo_arm *cpu_info = &per_cpu(cpu_data, cpuid);
>>
>> ? ? ? cpu_info->loops_per_jiffy = loops_per_jiffy;
>> +
>> + ? ? store_cpu_topology(cpuid);
>> +
>> ?}
>>
>> ?/*
>> @@ -354,6 +358,8 @@ void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
>> ?{
>> ? ? ? unsigned int ncores = num_possible_cpus();
>>
>> + ? ? init_cpu_topology();
>> +
>> ? ? ? smp_store_cpu_info(smp_processor_id());
>>
>> ? ? ? /*
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..d61723c
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
>> +/*
>> + * arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2011 ?vincent.guittot at linaro.org
>
> This should be
>
> Copyright (C) 2011 Linaro Limited.
>
> Written by: Vincent Guittot
>
ok
>> + *
>> + * based on arch/sh/kernel/topology.c
>> + *
>> + * This file is subject to the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public
>> + * License. ?See the file "COPYING" in the main directory of this archive
>> + * for more details.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/cpu.h>
>> +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
>> +#include <linux/init.h>
>> +#include <linux/percpu.h>
>> +#include <linux/node.h>
>> +#include <linux/nodemask.h>
>> +#include <linux/sched.h>
>> +
>> +#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>> +#include <asm/topology.h>
>> +
>> +#define hard_smp_mpidr() \
>> + ? ? ({ \
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? unsigned int cpunum; \
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? __asm__("mrc p15, 0, %0, c0, c0, 5" ? ? \
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? : "=r" (cpunum)); \
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? cpunum; \
>> + ? ? })
>> +
>> +struct cputopo_arm cpu_topology[NR_CPUS];
>> +
>> +const struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(unsigned int cpu)
>> +{
>> + ? ? return &(cpu_topology[cpu].core_sibling);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * store_cpu_topology is called at boot when only one cpu is running
>> + * and with the mutex cpu_hotplug.lock locked, when several cpus have booted,
>> + * which prevents simultaneous write access to cpu_topology array
>> + */
>> +void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid)
>> +{
>> + ? ? struct cputopo_arm *cpuid_topo = &(cpu_topology[cpuid]);
>> + ? ? unsigned int mpidr;
>> + ? ? unsigned int cpu;
>> +
>> + ? ? /* If the cpu topology has been already set, just return */
>> + ? ? if (cpuid_topo->core_id != -1)
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? return;
>> +
>> + ? ? mpidr = hard_smp_mpidr();
>> +
>> + ? ? /* create cpu topology mapping */
>> + ? ? if (mpidr & (0x3 << 30)) {
>
> Use #defines for the MPIDR bit-fields
>
> #define MPIDR_U_BITMASK (0x3 << 30)
>
> BTW, Bit 31 seems to always be 1, do you really want that in the mask?
>
According to
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ddi0406b/index.html
we need to test both bit 31 and bit 24
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? /*
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ?* This is a multiprocessor system
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ?* multiprocessor format & multiprocessor mode field are set
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ?*/
>> +
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? if (mpidr & (0x1 << 24)) {
>
> According to
> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.ddi0388f/CIHCHADB.html
>
> bit 24 is SBZ. Where is this redefined for MT?
>
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? /* core performance interdependency */
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? cpuid_topo->thread_id = (mpidr & 0x3);
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? cpuid_topo->core_id = ?((mpidr >> 8) & 0xF);
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? cpuid_topo->socket_id = ((mpidr >> 16) & 0xFF);
>
> Define BITMASKs for these bits too.
>
ok
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? } else {
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? /* normal core interdependency */
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? cpuid_topo->thread_id = -1;
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? cpuid_topo->core_id = (mpidr & 0x3);
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? cpuid_topo->socket_id = ((mpidr >> 8) & 0xF);
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? }
>> + ? ? } else {
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? /*
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ?* This is an uniprocessor system
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ?* we are in multiprocessor format but uniprocessor system
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ?* or in the old uniprocessor format
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ?*/
>> +
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? cpuid_topo->thread_id = -1;
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? cpuid_topo->core_id = 0;
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? cpuid_topo->socket_id = -1;
>> + ? ? }
>> +
>> + ? ? /* update core and thread sibling masks */
>> + ? ? for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? struct cputopo_arm *cpu_topo = &(cpu_topology[cpu]);
>> +
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? if (cpuid_topo->socket_id == cpu_topo->socket_id) {
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid, &cpu_topo->core_sibling);
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (cpu != cpuid)
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? cpumask_set_cpu(cpu,
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? &cpuid_topo->core_sibling);
>> +
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (cpuid_topo->core_id == cpu_topo->core_id) {
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid,
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? &cpu_topo->thread_sibling);
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (cpu != cpuid)
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? cpumask_set_cpu(cpu,
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? &cpuid_topo->thread_sibling);
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? }
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? }
>> + ? ? }
>> + ? ? smp_wmb();
>> +
>> + ? ? printk(KERN_INFO "cpu %u : thread %d cpu %d, socket %d, mpidr %x\n",
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? cpuid, cpu_topology[cpuid].thread_id,
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? cpu_topology[cpuid].core_id,
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? cpu_topology[cpuid].socket_id, mpidr);
>> +
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * init_cpu_topology is called at boot when only one cpu is running
>> + * which prevent simultaneous write access to cpu_topology array
>> + */
>> +void init_cpu_topology(void)
>> +{
>> + ? ? unsigned int cpu;
>> +
>> + ? ? /* init core mask */
>> + ? ? for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? struct cputopo_arm *cpu_topo = &(cpu_topology[cpu]);
>> +
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? cpu_topo->thread_id = -1;
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? cpu_topo->core_id = ?-1;
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? cpu_topo->socket_id = -1;
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? cpumask_clear(&cpu_topo->core_sibling);
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? cpumask_clear(&cpu_topo->thread_sibling);
>> + ? ? }
>> + ? ? smp_wmb();
>> +}
>> --
>> 1.7.4.1
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-16 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-16 8:49 [RFC] Add Arm cpu topology definition Vincent Guittot
2011-06-16 8:55 ` Samuel Thibault
2011-06-16 9:44 ` Vincent Guittot
2011-06-16 9:47 ` Samuel Thibault
2011-06-16 9:56 ` Vincent Guittot
2011-06-16 10:49 ` Daniel Lezcano
2011-06-16 12:05 ` Vincent Guittot
2011-06-16 11:48 ` Amit Kucheria
2011-06-16 12:30 ` Vincent Guittot [this message]
2011-06-16 11:55 ` Amit Kachhap
2011-06-16 12:10 ` Vincent Guittot
2011-06-16 13:24 ` Christian Robottom Reis
2011-06-16 13:48 ` Vincent Guittot
2011-06-16 19:40 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-06-17 6:54 ` Vincent Guittot
2011-06-21 20:36 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-06-22 9:17 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-06-22 10:19 ` Amit Kucheria
2011-06-16 21:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-17 7:43 ` Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTi=mQFTbvsbN4S45D3r2vbYgD2iOAQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).