From: per.forlin@linaro.org (Per Forlin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] sdio: add function to enable and disable sdio_single_irq optimization
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 09:39:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=pa1hC_nm1HmWRLO+vw_set=py0g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinUEq_tvCtXWjg3t6L589y80nPPog@mail.gmail.com>
On 1 June 2011 09:30, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> 2011/5/31 Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org>:
>
>> +/**
>> + * ? ? sdio_single_irq_enable - enable or disable SDIO single IRQ function
>> + * ? ? @card: card to enable SDIO single irq
>> + * ? ? @value: true to enable SDIO single irq function, false to disable
>> + *
>> + * ? ? If there is only 1 function interrupt registered and SDIO single IRQ
>> + * ? ? is enable, the irq handler is called directly without reading
>> + * ? ? the CCCR registers
>> + */
>> +void sdio_single_irq_enable(struct mmc_card *card, bool value)
>> +{
>> + ? ? ? card->sdio_single_irq_en = value;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sdio_single_irq_enable);
>
> Can we use a quirk for implementing this for the specific problematic
> card instead?
>
Yes, quirks is the thing I should use.
I'll remove this function and replace it with a quirk. The default
state could then be sdio_single_irq enable and for all none supported
hardware (device ID) sdio_single_irq will be disable.
> Daniel, do you have the vendor and device ID for the problematic
> Libertas card you're working on so this can be quirked explicitly
> in drivers/mmc/core/quirks.c?
>
Even if Daniel fix this issue in libertas it is still good to have a
sdio_single_irq quirk in place for other SDIO devices with the same
hardware issue.
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>
Thanks,
Per
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-01 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-31 20:33 [PATCH 0/2] sdio: make sdio_single_irq optional due to suprious IRQ Per Forlin
2011-05-31 20:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] sdio: add function to enable and disable sdio_single_irq optimization Per Forlin
2011-06-01 7:30 ` Linus Walleij
2011-06-01 7:39 ` Per Forlin [this message]
2011-05-31 20:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] sdio: report error if pending IRQ but none function bits Per Forlin
2011-06-01 14:30 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-06-07 7:02 ` Per Forlin
2011-05-31 21:52 ` [PATCH 0/2] sdio: make sdio_single_irq optional due to suprious IRQ Daniel Drake
2011-06-01 14:29 ` Nicolas Pitre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTi=pa1hC_nm1HmWRLO+vw_set=py0g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=per.forlin@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).