From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dbaryshkov@gmail.com (Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:54:30 +0400 Subject: [PATCH] ATMEL, AVR32: inline nand partition table access In-Reply-To: <1306935129.1097.3.camel@hcegtvedt.norway.atmel.com> References: <1306676962-22308-1-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com> <1306935129.1097.3.camel@hcegtvedt.norway.atmel.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 6/1/11, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: > On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 17:49 +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: >> Currently atmel_nand driver used by AT91 and AVR32 calls a special >> callback >> which return nand partition table and number of partitions. However in all >> boards this callback returns just static data. So drop this callback and >> make atmel_nand use partition table provided statically via platform_data. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > > Thanks for this update, always nice seeing code being optimized. I > really can't recall why it was made like this in the first place... > > For the AVR32 related parts: > > Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt > > > > Will this go through the linux-mtd tree (since it spans two archs) or > should it go through an arch tree? On one hand, I'd prefer for this to go through the linux-mtd, if noone objects, as I'd also like to submit several (a pile) patches cleaning up mtd partitioning, which would depend on this. OTOH, I think there will be a cleanup of AT91 platform, which would bring lot's of conflicts with this patch, if it goes through linux-mtd. -- With best wishes Dmitry