[PATCH] s3c2410_udc: fix custom UDC command handling

[skacore.systems@gmail.com (Skacore Systems)]

Oh and I've finally cloned the mainline git. So here it's the last try.
I hope the TI people will not sabotage the Samsung's drivers any way longer !!!

Vilo

diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/s3c2410_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/s3c2410_udc.c
index 100f263..b6e1ca5 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/s3c2410_udc.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/s3c2410_udc.c
@@ -1567,7 +1567,7 @@ static void s3c2410_udc_command(enum
s3c2410_udc_cmd_e cmd)
                return;

        if (udc_info->udc_command) {
-               udc_info->udc_command(S3C2410_UDC_P_DISABLE);
+               udc_info->udc_command(cmd);
        } else if (gpio_is_valid(udc_info->pullup_pin)) {
                int value;


On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Skacore Systems
<skacore.systems@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok I'm giving it up. This is just a non-sence.
> I've followed the exact rules written there, so tell me how the patch
> could be wrong.
> The rules are obsolete or you made up a new ones ?
> Regarding to the testing. If you've at least looked in to the patch
> (and you probably not giving a stupid questions about it!)
> you would know that this is 100% bug and you don't even have to
> compile to see that fix is actually working.
> And of course I've tested it on our production kernel.
> Look somehow it's gonna fix it. It must not be you,
> someone will just (I hope Samsung's people do care about their stuff) do it.
> The amount of time I and you've put into this discussion is just pure waste.
>
> Vilo
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 05:20:02PM +0200, Skacore Systems wrote:
>>> I've been exactly following
>>> http://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/SubmittingPatches:
>>>
>>> To create a patch for a single file, it is often sufficient to do:
>>>
>>> ? ? ? SRCTREE= linux-2.6
>>> ? ? ? MYFILE= ?drivers/net/mydriver.c
>>>
>>> ? ? ? cd $SRCTREE
>>> ? ? ? cp $MYFILE $MYFILE.orig
>>> ? ? ? vi $MYFILE ? ? ?# make your change
>>> ? ? ? cd ..
>>> ? ? ? diff -up $SRCTREE/$MYFILE{.orig,} > /tmp/patch
>>>
>>> And that's what I've done. What do you think is wrong with it ???
>>
>> patch should be in 'p1' format to start with, not 'p0'!!
>>
>> Your commit log shouldn't include your "regards" or anything like that,
>> or that will go into the git history.
>>
>>> Subject: [PATCH] s3c2410_udc: fix custom UDC command handling
>>
>> this should be something like:
>>
>> [PATCH] usb: gadget: s3c2410_udc: fix custom UDC command handling
>>
>> we generally put the subsystem on the subject to help maintainers
>> filter patches related to them.
>>
>>> There is a bug in Samsung's UDC driver, which is completely disabling
>>> the USB device when a custom UDC command is used.
>>> Following patch seems to get the right?behavior (e.g. enabling pull-up
>>> instead of disabling then Vcc is applied).
>>
>> "seems to get the right behavior" makes me wonder if you really tested
>> this properly. Either it fixes the problem, or it doesn't. Have you
>> tried with other possible commands to see if also helps ?
>>
>>> Also I'm not in mailing list so please CC me.
>>
>> this would go to commit log, shouldn't be here.
>>
>>> Greetingz,
>>> Vilo
>>
>> this shouldn't be here either.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Viliam Mateicka <viliam.mateicka@gmail.com>
>>
>> there should be a tear line here. (---)
>>
>>> --- drivers/usb/gadget/s3c2410_udc.c.orig ? ? ? 2011-05-19
>>> 06:06:34.000000000 +0200
>>
>> this line break is bogus.
>>
>> you could have looked at any mailing list archive for properly formatted
>> patches, but instead you chose to be unpolite with the persons who are
>> giving you a "service" free of charge.
>>
>> At [1] you can find an example of a proper patch
>>
>> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=130833192703040&w=2
>>
>> --
>> balbi
>>
>