From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: eballetbo@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Enric_Balletb=C3=B2_i_Serra?=)
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 09:57:35 +0200
Subject: [RESEND PATCH 1/4] omap: igep0020: name refactoring for future
	merge with IGEP3
In-Reply-To: <20110517075345.GQ5323@atomide.com>
References: <cover.1305235542.git.mike@compulab.co.il>
	<d6dc9e334c729523f25993b7d610808e537ca74c.1305235542.git.mike@compulab.co.il>
	<BANLkTikJaN=Q2RgrA7Hz-ye2BCOjNK42zA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110517075345.GQ5323@atomide.com>
Message-ID: <BANLkTikCgWxQoiYfS4O4+9jYCVBmcMAEOQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi,

2011/5/17 Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>:
> * Enric Balletb? i Serra <eballetbo@gmail.com> [110516 10:11]:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> The only comment I wanted to do is maybe I prefer rename the
>> board-igep0020 to board-igep00x0 to be more generic. Apart from this
>> these patch series looks good for me and has my ack. Thanks.
>
> I suggest we do the rename separately later on. Otherwise it
> easily gets classified as "crazy churn" type of patch, so best
> to stick to just code coalescing and fixes for this merge window.

Ok, so Mike you've my ack, thanks

Cheers,
   Enric