From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: kmpark@infradead.org (Kyungmin Park)
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:57:08 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] ARM: S3C6410: Support 800MHz operation in cpufreq
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikpO9VR9tqJT_bROA_KfdxOBS7U0Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20110601094313.GA23122@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
	<1306921493-30911-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
	<1306921493-30911-4-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
	<037201cc2046$f5cc53b0$e164fb10$@com>
	<20110601104042.GA15387@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
	<038c01cc20b9$a55a5120$f00ef360$@com>
	<20110602082830.GA3085@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
	<039601cc2109$319c9770$94d5c650$@com>
	<BANLkTimC=MrmjinzufrnOMSAgiQvVKdWhA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikpO9VR9tqJT_bROA_KfdxOBS7U0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BANLkTikJR1CR=fwomzrsRgXib-LUiU=UQw@mail.gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It's really unfortunate that there's no software visible method I'm
>>>> aware of :/
>>> Unfortunately, There is no method to detect 800Mhz s3c6410 by software.
>>
>> Then how about to introduce the software flags. and set it at each
>> board. It can support the 800MHz.
>> Also this flags are handled at cpufreq drivers properly.
>>
>> How do you think?
>
> Two SMDKs may have different versions of s3c6410.
> Which file do we want to set the flags in ?

Does it general case in real? As SMDK is development board. If make a
real board, it usually uses the same revision chip.
>