From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: per.forlin@linaro.org (Per Forlin)
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:03:18 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v2 00/12] mmc: use nonblock mmc requests to minimize
	latency
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikwCveocjPdoMoLEVpNneKkq66s4g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1302116833-24540-1-git-send-email-per.forlin@linaro.org>
	<BANLkTikZVDejarZ4O5KgNS7S4fxBLSmANA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikVeXvfSBS-xLDXVdesKJpKdtUVqg@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikwCveocjPdoMoLEVpNneKkq66s4g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BANLkTikoj6UTx08ntZaMM15taKRXjrU_Mg@mail.gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 10 April 2011 05:33, anish singh <anish198519851985@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Jae hoon Chung <jh80.chung@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Per..
>>
>> I'm applied your patch..and sent the patch about dw_mmc.c.
>> I think good this approach..
>
> Forlin,i too want to test this patch of yours but unfortunately i have
> samsung board+SDHCI host controller so i guess i just need to write pre_req
> and post_req functions and that would enable this(nonblock mmc request) on
> my board.Hope i am right?
You are right. The  SDHCI driver should work just fine without
implementing pre_req and post_req but you wont see any performance
increasing for DMA usage.
In order to benefit from the patchset you need to implement pre_req
and post_req.

If you run into trouble implementing those hooks or if you have any
questions please let me know.

Regards,
Per