From: eric.miao@linaro.org (Eric Miao)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] gpio/plat-pxa: fix clash with gpiolib namespace
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:49:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTiky1GrQu7ooxgUNGfLQsW8haTF4sA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110613150247.GA18161@ponder.secretlab.ca>
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Grant Likely
<grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 05:03:50PM +0800, Eric Miao wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Linus Walleij
>> <linus.walleij@stericsson.com> wrote:
>> > From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>> >
>> > The PXA platform code has a static inline helper called
>> > gpio_to_chip which clashes with the gpiolib namespace if we
>> > try to expose the function with the same name from gpiolib,
>> > and it's still confusing even if we don't do that. So rename
>> > it to gpio_to_pxachip().
>> >
>> > Reported-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@visionengravers.com>
>> > Cc: Eric Miao <eric.miao@linaro.org>
>> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>>
>> OK, applied to 'devel'.
>
> Is the pxa gpio driver going to be moved to drivers/gpio this cycle?
> If so, you'll probably want to keep the gpio changes in a separate
> branch that can be merged both into gpio/next and your devel branch,
> just in case there ends up being merge issues between our branches in
> linux-next.
Working on that - the problem is the tight coupling of IRQ subsystem and
PXA's odd interrupt routing scheme (GPIO0, GPIO1 have dedicated IRQs,
yet GPIO2 and above they share a single GPIO), while some other PXAs
they all share a single IRQ line. Would work on that for some time
though, so yeah I'll possibly keep this in seperate branch.
>
> g.
>
>>
>> > ---
>> > ?arch/arm/plat-pxa/gpio.c | ? 10 +++++-----
>> > ?1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-pxa/gpio.c b/arch/arm/plat-pxa/gpio.c
>> > index 48ebb94..a11dc36 100644
>> > --- a/arch/arm/plat-pxa/gpio.c
>> > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-pxa/gpio.c
>> > @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static inline void __iomem *gpio_chip_base(struct gpio_chip *c)
>> > ? ? ? ?return container_of(c, struct pxa_gpio_chip, chip)->regbase;
>> > ?}
>> >
>> > -static inline struct pxa_gpio_chip *gpio_to_chip(unsigned gpio)
>> > +static inline struct pxa_gpio_chip *gpio_to_pxachip(unsigned gpio)
>> > ?{
>> > ? ? ? ?return &pxa_gpio_chips[gpio_to_bank(gpio)];
>> > ?}
>> > @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static int pxa_gpio_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
>> > ? ? ? ?int gpio = irq_to_gpio(d->irq);
>> > ? ? ? ?unsigned long gpdr, mask = GPIO_bit(gpio);
>> >
>> > - ? ? ? c = gpio_to_chip(gpio);
>> > + ? ? ? c = gpio_to_pxachip(gpio);
>> >
>> > ? ? ? ?if (type == IRQ_TYPE_PROBE) {
>> > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?/* Don't mess with enabled GPIOs using preconfigured edges or
>> > @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ static void pxa_gpio_demux_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
>> > ?static void pxa_ack_muxed_gpio(struct irq_data *d)
>> > ?{
>> > ? ? ? ?int gpio = irq_to_gpio(d->irq);
>> > - ? ? ? struct pxa_gpio_chip *c = gpio_to_chip(gpio);
>> > + ? ? ? struct pxa_gpio_chip *c = gpio_to_pxachip(gpio);
>> >
>> > ? ? ? ?__raw_writel(GPIO_bit(gpio), c->regbase + GEDR_OFFSET);
>> > ?}
>> > @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ static void pxa_ack_muxed_gpio(struct irq_data *d)
>> > ?static void pxa_mask_muxed_gpio(struct irq_data *d)
>> > ?{
>> > ? ? ? ?int gpio = irq_to_gpio(d->irq);
>> > - ? ? ? struct pxa_gpio_chip *c = gpio_to_chip(gpio);
>> > + ? ? ? struct pxa_gpio_chip *c = gpio_to_pxachip(gpio);
>> > ? ? ? ?uint32_t grer, gfer;
>> >
>> > ? ? ? ?c->irq_mask &= ~GPIO_bit(gpio);
>> > @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static void pxa_mask_muxed_gpio(struct irq_data *d)
>> > ?static void pxa_unmask_muxed_gpio(struct irq_data *d)
>> > ?{
>> > ? ? ? ?int gpio = irq_to_gpio(d->irq);
>> > - ? ? ? struct pxa_gpio_chip *c = gpio_to_chip(gpio);
>> > + ? ? ? struct pxa_gpio_chip *c = gpio_to_pxachip(gpio);
>> >
>> > ? ? ? ?c->irq_mask |= GPIO_bit(gpio);
>> > ? ? ? ?update_edge_detect(c);
>> > --
>> > 1.7.3.2
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-13 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-13 8:42 [PATCH] gpio/plat-pxa: fix clash with gpiolib namespace Linus Walleij
2011-06-13 9:03 ` Eric Miao
2011-06-13 15:02 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-13 15:49 ` Eric Miao [this message]
2011-06-13 15:03 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTiky1GrQu7ooxgUNGfLQsW8haTF4sA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=eric.miao@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).