linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linus.walleij@linaro.org (Linus Walleij)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] clocksource: add DB8500 PRCMU Timer support
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 10:37:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimAOWNJNGJwJkCkwwDJ2BR__NCV+A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110601083000.GD3660@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

2011/6/1 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:18:25PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> Keeping it under include/linux is probably wise since we want drivers
>> OUT of the ARM tree, but I don't know if there is much consensus on that?
>
> Header files private to a driver should be alongside the driver. ?Look
> at drivers/net or drivers/scsi for plenty of examples.
>
> Just because its a header file does not mean it must be in some directory
> with 'include' in its path. ?The only reason to put it in include/linux
> is if it contains stuff which needs to be shared outside of the driver
> (eg, with arches).

I agree. Right now I have a creepy feeling that many drivers are just
putting headers in <mach/foo.h> out of habit, when plain "foo.h" in
working dir or <linux/subsystem/foo.h> is what is really apropriate.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

      reply	other threads:[~2011-06-01  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-31  8:31 [PATCH 2/3] clocksource: add DB8500 PRCMU Timer support Mattias Wallin
2011-05-31 10:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-31 17:00   ` Mattias Wallin
2011-05-31 21:18     ` Linus Walleij
2011-06-01  7:57       ` Mattias Wallin
2011-06-01 14:22         ` Mattias Wallin
2011-06-01 14:25           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-01 14:31             ` Mattias Wallin
2011-06-01 14:36               ` Mattias Wallin
2011-06-01 23:35               ` Linus Walleij
2011-06-01  8:30       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-01  8:37         ` Linus Walleij [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BANLkTimAOWNJNGJwJkCkwwDJ2BR__NCV+A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).