From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: akinobu.mita@gmail.com (Akinobu Mita) Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 07:59:30 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] bitops: add ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_BIT_LE guard In-Reply-To: <201104201631.40017.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1303309252-9946-1-git-send-email-akinobu.mita@gmail.com> <201104201631.40017.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org 2011/4/20 Arnd Bergmann : > On Wednesday 20 April 2011, Akinobu Mita wrote: >> index 946a21b..bd2253e 100644 >> --- a/include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h >> +++ b/include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h >> @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ static inline unsigned long find_first_zero_bit_le(const void *addr, >> >> ?#define BITOP_LE_SWIZZLE ? ? ? ((BITS_PER_LONG-1) & ~0x7) >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_BIT_LE >> + >> ?extern unsigned long find_next_zero_bit_le(const void *addr, >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? unsigned long size, unsigned long offset); >> ?extern unsigned long find_next_bit_le(const void *addr, >> @@ -38,6 +40,8 @@ extern unsigned long find_next_bit_le(const void *addr, >> ?#define find_first_zero_bit_le(addr, size) \ >> ? ? ? ? find_next_zero_bit_le((addr), (size), 0) >> >> +#endif /* CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_BIT_LE */ >> + >> ?#else >> ?#error "Please fix " >> ?#endif > > The style that we normally use in asm-generic is to test the macro itself > for existence, so in asm-generic, do: > > #ifndef find_next_zero_bit_le > extern unsigned long find_next_zero_bit_le(const void *addr, > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? unsigned long size, unsigned long offset); > #endif > > and in the architectures, write > > static inline unsigned long find_next_zero_bit_le(const void *addr, > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? unsigned long size, unsigned long offset) > #define find_next_zero_bit_le find_next_zero_bit_le > > I guess we can do the #ifdef separately for each of the three macros, > or choose one of them to use as a key. I see. Should we also kill CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_BIT_LE option comletely, then add the #ifdef for each find_*() in lib/find_next_bit.c and always build it unconditionally ?