From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sachinikam@gmail.com (Sachin Nikam) Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:37:32 +0530 Subject: [PATCH v2 00/12] mmc: use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency In-Reply-To: References: <1302116833-24540-1-git-send-email-per.forlin@linaro.org> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Does anybody knows which kernel version will have support for SD4.0 specs UHS-2? On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Per Forlin wrote: > On 10 April 2011 05:33, anish singh wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Jae hoon Chung > wrote: > >> > >> Hi Per.. > >> > >> I'm applied your patch..and sent the patch about dw_mmc.c. > >> I think good this approach.. > > > > Forlin,i too want to test this patch of yours but unfortunately i have > > samsung board+SDHCI host controller so i guess i just need to write > pre_req > > and post_req functions and that would enable this(nonblock mmc request) > on > > my board.Hope i am right? > You are right. The SDHCI driver should work just fine without > implementing pre_req and post_req but you wont see any performance > increasing for DMA usage. > In order to benefit from the patchset you need to implement pre_req > and post_req. > > If you run into trouble implementing those hooks or if you have any > questions please let me know. > > Regards, > Per > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in > the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Have a nice time !!! Cheers, Sachin. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: