From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linus.walleij@linaro.org (Linus Walleij) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 16:51:17 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 02/10] mach-u300: rewrite gpio driver, move to drivers/gpio In-Reply-To: <0D753D10438DA54287A00B027084269764D26C443E@AUSP01VMBX24.collaborationhost.net> References: <1303910002-3333-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> <0D753D10438DA54287A00B027084269764D2650215@AUSP01VMBX24.collaborationhost.net> <0D753D10438DA54287A00B027084269764D26C443E@AUSP01VMBX24.collaborationhost.net> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org 2011/4/28 H Hartley Sweeten : > On Thursday, April 28, 2011 12:08 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: >> 2011/4/27 H Hartley Sweeten : >>> The Makefile should probably be reordered, either alphabetically >>> or grouped by type (arch/mmio/i2c/spi/pci/etc) and then >>> alphabetically in order to reduce merge conflicts. >> >> Yes, but if I do that in my patchset I will screw up Grants GPIO tree >> completely, so I prefer that Grant do this. And maybe after pulling >> in my GPIO consolidation tree to his in that case, so we don't get >> undesired collisions. So leaving this for the GPIO maintainer. > > This comment was intended for the GPIO maintainer. ?Sorry for any > confusion. Nop problem, I actually made a fix for it that I think Grant can take in for 2.6.40. Yours, Linus Walleij