* [PATCH V2 0/3] ARM: Add SPDIF support for EXYNOS4
@ 2011-06-21 11:24 Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
2011-06-21 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: Samsung: Move duplicate code Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi @ 2011-06-21 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
o To Kukjin Kim, Sangbeom Kim, Jassi Brar and Seungwhan Youn
[PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: Samsung: Move duplicate code
o This is a prerequisite for 2/3 and 3/3 patches thus mentioned as "v2".
[PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add sclk_spdif clocks.
o v1 patch is https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/867882/
[PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add EPLL clock operations
o v1 patch is https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/867872/
Best Regards,
Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: Samsung: Move duplicate code 2011-06-21 11:24 [PATCH V2 0/3] ARM: Add SPDIF support for EXYNOS4 Naveen Krishna Chatradhi @ 2011-06-21 11:24 ` Naveen Krishna Chatradhi 2011-07-18 5:35 ` Kukjin Kim 2011-06-21 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add sclk_spdif clocks Naveen Krishna Chatradhi ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi @ 2011-06-21 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Move the duplicated code for SPDIF ops from S5PV210 and S5PC100. So, the same can be used in EXYNOS4. Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com> --- Note: Moved common code to plat-s5p, as suggested by Kukjin Kim. arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/clock.c | 37 +--------------------------- arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c | 37 +--------------------------- arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/s5p-clock.h | 5 ++++ 4 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/clock.c index cd248e6..ff5cbb3 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/clock.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/clock.c @@ -910,47 +910,12 @@ struct clksrc_sources clk_src_sclk_spdif = { .nr_sources = ARRAY_SIZE(clk_sclk_spdif_list), }; -static int s5pc100_spdif_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) -{ - struct clk *pclk; - int ret; - - pclk = clk_get_parent(clk); - if (IS_ERR(pclk)) - return -EINVAL; - - ret = pclk->ops->set_rate(pclk, rate); - clk_put(pclk); - - return ret; -} - -static unsigned long s5pc100_spdif_get_rate(struct clk *clk) -{ - struct clk *pclk; - int rate; - - pclk = clk_get_parent(clk); - if (IS_ERR(pclk)) - return -EINVAL; - - rate = pclk->ops->get_rate(clk); - clk_put(pclk); - - return rate; -} - -static struct clk_ops s5pc100_sclk_spdif_ops = { - .set_rate = s5pc100_spdif_set_rate, - .get_rate = s5pc100_spdif_get_rate, -}; - static struct clksrc_clk clk_sclk_spdif = { .clk = { .name = "sclk_spdif", .ctrlbit = (1 << 11), .enable = s5pc100_sclk1_ctrl, - .ops = &s5pc100_sclk_spdif_ops, + .ops = &s5p_sclk_spdif_ops, }, .sources = &clk_src_sclk_spdif, .reg_src = { .reg = S5P_CLK_SRC3, .shift = 24, .size = 2 }, diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c index b5c95e6..ae72f87 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c @@ -686,47 +686,12 @@ static struct clksrc_sources clkset_sclk_spdif = { .nr_sources = ARRAY_SIZE(clkset_sclk_spdif_list), }; -static int s5pv210_spdif_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) -{ - struct clk *pclk; - int ret; - - pclk = clk_get_parent(clk); - if (IS_ERR(pclk)) - return -EINVAL; - - ret = pclk->ops->set_rate(pclk, rate); - clk_put(pclk); - - return ret; -} - -static unsigned long s5pv210_spdif_get_rate(struct clk *clk) -{ - struct clk *pclk; - int rate; - - pclk = clk_get_parent(clk); - if (IS_ERR(pclk)) - return -EINVAL; - - rate = pclk->ops->get_rate(clk); - clk_put(pclk); - - return rate; -} - -static struct clk_ops s5pv210_sclk_spdif_ops = { - .set_rate = s5pv210_spdif_set_rate, - .get_rate = s5pv210_spdif_get_rate, -}; - static struct clksrc_clk clk_sclk_spdif = { .clk = { .name = "sclk_spdif", .enable = s5pv210_clk_mask0_ctrl, .ctrlbit = (1 << 27), - .ops = &s5pv210_sclk_spdif_ops, + .ops = &s5p_sclk_spdif_ops, }, .sources = &clkset_sclk_spdif, .reg_src = { .reg = S5P_CLK_SRC6, .shift = 12, .size = 2 }, diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c index 8d081d9..02af235 100644 --- a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c @@ -168,6 +168,41 @@ unsigned long s5p_epll_get_rate(struct clk *clk) return clk->rate; } +int s5p_spdif_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) +{ + struct clk *pclk; + int ret; + + pclk = clk_get_parent(clk); + if (IS_ERR(pclk)) + return -EINVAL; + + ret = pclk->ops->set_rate(pclk, rate); + clk_put(pclk); + + return ret; +} + +unsigned long s5p_spdif_get_rate(struct clk *clk) +{ + struct clk *pclk; + int rate; + + pclk = clk_get_parent(clk); + if (IS_ERR(pclk)) + return -EINVAL; + + rate = pclk->ops->get_rate(clk); + clk_put(pclk); + + return rate; +} + +struct clk_ops s5p_sclk_spdif_ops = { + .set_rate = s5p_spdif_set_rate, + .get_rate = s5p_spdif_get_rate, +}; + static struct clk *s5p_clks[] __initdata = { &clk_ext_xtal_mux, &clk_48m, diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/s5p-clock.h b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/s5p-clock.h index 2b6dcff..769b5bd 100644 --- a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/s5p-clock.h +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/s5p-clock.h @@ -47,4 +47,9 @@ extern int s5p_gatectrl(void __iomem *reg, struct clk *clk, int enable); extern int s5p_epll_enable(struct clk *clk, int enable); extern unsigned long s5p_epll_get_rate(struct clk *clk); +/* SPDIF clk operations common for S5PC100/V210/C110 and Exynos4 */ +extern int s5p_spdif_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate); +extern unsigned long s5p_spdif_get_rate(struct clk *clk); + +extern struct clk_ops s5p_sclk_spdif_ops; #endif /* __ASM_PLAT_S5P_CLOCK_H */ -- 1.7.2.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: Samsung: Move duplicate code 2011-06-21 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: Samsung: Move duplicate code Naveen Krishna Chatradhi @ 2011-07-18 5:35 ` Kukjin Kim 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Kukjin Kim @ 2011-07-18 5:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote: > > Move the duplicated code for SPDIF ops from S5PV210 and S5PC100. > So, the same can be used in EXYNOS4. > > Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com> > --- > Note: Moved common code to plat-s5p, as suggested by Kukjin Kim. Yes, I did :) Looks ok to me, will apply. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. > > arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/clock.c | 37 +--------------------------- > arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c | 37 +--------------------------- > arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c | 35 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/s5p-clock.h | 5 ++++ > 4 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/clock.c > index cd248e6..ff5cbb3 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/clock.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/clock.c > @@ -910,47 +910,12 @@ struct clksrc_sources clk_src_sclk_spdif = { > .nr_sources = ARRAY_SIZE(clk_sclk_spdif_list), > }; > > -static int s5pc100_spdif_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) > -{ > - struct clk *pclk; > - int ret; > - > - pclk = clk_get_parent(clk); > - if (IS_ERR(pclk)) > - return -EINVAL; > - > - ret = pclk->ops->set_rate(pclk, rate); > - clk_put(pclk); > - > - return ret; > -} > - > -static unsigned long s5pc100_spdif_get_rate(struct clk *clk) > -{ > - struct clk *pclk; > - int rate; > - > - pclk = clk_get_parent(clk); > - if (IS_ERR(pclk)) > - return -EINVAL; > - > - rate = pclk->ops->get_rate(clk); > - clk_put(pclk); > - > - return rate; > -} > - > -static struct clk_ops s5pc100_sclk_spdif_ops = { > - .set_rate = s5pc100_spdif_set_rate, > - .get_rate = s5pc100_spdif_get_rate, > -}; > - > static struct clksrc_clk clk_sclk_spdif = { > .clk = { > .name = "sclk_spdif", > .ctrlbit = (1 << 11), > .enable = s5pc100_sclk1_ctrl, > - .ops = &s5pc100_sclk_spdif_ops, > + .ops = &s5p_sclk_spdif_ops, > }, > .sources = &clk_src_sclk_spdif, > .reg_src = { .reg = S5P_CLK_SRC3, .shift = 24, .size = 2 }, > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c > index b5c95e6..ae72f87 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c > @@ -686,47 +686,12 @@ static struct clksrc_sources clkset_sclk_spdif = { > .nr_sources = ARRAY_SIZE(clkset_sclk_spdif_list), > }; > > -static int s5pv210_spdif_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) > -{ > - struct clk *pclk; > - int ret; > - > - pclk = clk_get_parent(clk); > - if (IS_ERR(pclk)) > - return -EINVAL; > - > - ret = pclk->ops->set_rate(pclk, rate); > - clk_put(pclk); > - > - return ret; > -} > - > -static unsigned long s5pv210_spdif_get_rate(struct clk *clk) > -{ > - struct clk *pclk; > - int rate; > - > - pclk = clk_get_parent(clk); > - if (IS_ERR(pclk)) > - return -EINVAL; > - > - rate = pclk->ops->get_rate(clk); > - clk_put(pclk); > - > - return rate; > -} > - > -static struct clk_ops s5pv210_sclk_spdif_ops = { > - .set_rate = s5pv210_spdif_set_rate, > - .get_rate = s5pv210_spdif_get_rate, > -}; > - > static struct clksrc_clk clk_sclk_spdif = { > .clk = { > .name = "sclk_spdif", > .enable = s5pv210_clk_mask0_ctrl, > .ctrlbit = (1 << 27), > - .ops = &s5pv210_sclk_spdif_ops, > + .ops = &s5p_sclk_spdif_ops, > }, > .sources = &clkset_sclk_spdif, > .reg_src = { .reg = S5P_CLK_SRC6, .shift = 12, .size = 2 }, > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c > index 8d081d9..02af235 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c > @@ -168,6 +168,41 @@ unsigned long s5p_epll_get_rate(struct clk *clk) > return clk->rate; > } > > +int s5p_spdif_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) > +{ > + struct clk *pclk; > + int ret; > + > + pclk = clk_get_parent(clk); > + if (IS_ERR(pclk)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + ret = pclk->ops->set_rate(pclk, rate); > + clk_put(pclk); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +unsigned long s5p_spdif_get_rate(struct clk *clk) > +{ > + struct clk *pclk; > + int rate; > + > + pclk = clk_get_parent(clk); > + if (IS_ERR(pclk)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + rate = pclk->ops->get_rate(clk); > + clk_put(pclk); > + > + return rate; > +} > + > +struct clk_ops s5p_sclk_spdif_ops = { > + .set_rate = s5p_spdif_set_rate, > + .get_rate = s5p_spdif_get_rate, > +}; > + > static struct clk *s5p_clks[] __initdata = { > &clk_ext_xtal_mux, > &clk_48m, > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/s5p-clock.h b/arch/arm/plat- > s5p/include/plat/s5p-clock.h > index 2b6dcff..769b5bd 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/s5p-clock.h > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/s5p-clock.h > @@ -47,4 +47,9 @@ extern int s5p_gatectrl(void __iomem *reg, struct clk *clk, int > enable); > extern int s5p_epll_enable(struct clk *clk, int enable); > extern unsigned long s5p_epll_get_rate(struct clk *clk); > > +/* SPDIF clk operations common for S5PC100/V210/C110 and Exynos4 */ > +extern int s5p_spdif_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate); > +extern unsigned long s5p_spdif_get_rate(struct clk *clk); > + > +extern struct clk_ops s5p_sclk_spdif_ops; > #endif /* __ASM_PLAT_S5P_CLOCK_H */ > -- > 1.7.2.3 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add sclk_spdif clocks. 2011-06-21 11:24 [PATCH V2 0/3] ARM: Add SPDIF support for EXYNOS4 Naveen Krishna Chatradhi 2011-06-21 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: Samsung: Move duplicate code Naveen Krishna Chatradhi @ 2011-06-21 11:24 ` Naveen Krishna Chatradhi 2011-07-18 5:33 ` Kukjin Kim 2011-06-21 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add EPLL clock operations Naveen Krishna Chatradhi 2011-06-30 5:54 ` [PATCH V2 0/3] ARM: Add SPDIF support for EXYNOS4 Naveen Krishna Ch 3 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi @ 2011-06-21 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Add the sclk_spdif clock is of type 'struct clksrc_clk' clock. Also, add clk_spdifextclk clocks of type 'struct clk' clock. Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com> --- arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c index 937335a..feeb27e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c @@ -64,6 +64,11 @@ static struct clk clk_audiocdclk2 = { .name = "audiocdclk", }; +static struct clk clk_spdifextclk = { + .name = "spdif_extclk", + .id = -1, +}; + static int exynos4_clksrc_mask_top_ctrl(struct clk *clk, int enable) { return s5p_gatectrl(S5P_CLKSRC_MASK_TOP, clk, enable); @@ -550,6 +555,11 @@ static struct clk init_clocks_off[] = { .enable = exynos4_clk_ip_peril_ctrl, .ctrlbit = (1 << 21), }, { + .name = "spdif", + .id = -1, + .enable = exynos4_clk_ip_peril_ctrl, + .ctrlbit = (1 << 26), + }, { .name = "ac97", .id = -1, .enable = exynos4_clk_ip_peril_ctrl, @@ -801,6 +811,30 @@ static struct clk init_clocks[] = { } }; +static struct clk *clkset_sclk_spdif_list[] = { + [0] = &clk_sclk_audio0.clk, + [1] = &clk_sclk_audio1.clk, + [2] = &clk_sclk_audio2.clk, + [3] = &clk_spdifextclk, +}; + +static struct clksrc_sources clkset_sclk_spdif = { + .sources = clkset_sclk_spdif_list, + .nr_sources = ARRAY_SIZE(clkset_sclk_spdif_list), +}; + +static struct clksrc_clk clk_sclk_spdif = { + .clk = { + .name = "sclk_spdif", + .id = -1, + .enable = exynos4_clksrc_mask_peril1_ctrl, + .ctrlbit = (1 << 8), + .ops = &s5p_sclk_spdif_ops, + }, + .sources = &clkset_sclk_spdif, + .reg_src = { .reg = S5P_CLKSRC_PERIL1, .shift = 8, .size = 2 }, +}; + static struct clk *clkset_group_list[] = { [0] = &clk_ext_xtal_mux, [1] = &clk_xusbxti, @@ -1206,6 +1240,7 @@ static struct clksrc_clk *sysclks[] = { &clk_sclk_audio0, &clk_sclk_audio1, &clk_sclk_audio2, + &clk_sclk_spdif, }; static int xtal_rate; -- 1.7.2.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add sclk_spdif clocks. 2011-06-21 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add sclk_spdif clocks Naveen Krishna Chatradhi @ 2011-07-18 5:33 ` Kukjin Kim 2011-07-18 11:25 ` Naveen Krishna Ch 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Kukjin Kim @ 2011-07-18 5:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote: > > Add the sclk_spdif clock is of type 'struct clksrc_clk' clock. > Also, add clk_spdifextclk clocks of type 'struct clk' clock. > > Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com> > --- > arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c | 35 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c > index 937335a..feeb27e 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c > @@ -64,6 +64,11 @@ static struct clk clk_audiocdclk2 = { > .name = "audiocdclk", > }; > > +static struct clk clk_spdifextclk = { > + .name = "spdif_extclk", > + .id = -1, > +}; > + > static int exynos4_clksrc_mask_top_ctrl(struct clk *clk, int enable) > { > return s5p_gatectrl(S5P_CLKSRC_MASK_TOP, clk, enable); > @@ -550,6 +555,11 @@ static struct clk init_clocks_off[] = { > .enable = exynos4_clk_ip_peril_ctrl, > .ctrlbit = (1 << 21), > }, { > + .name = "spdif", > + .id = -1, > + .enable = exynos4_clk_ip_peril_ctrl, > + .ctrlbit = (1 << 26), > + }, { Need to re-work based on clkdev :) > .name = "ac97", > .id = -1, > .enable = exynos4_clk_ip_peril_ctrl, > @@ -801,6 +811,30 @@ static struct clk init_clocks[] = { > } > }; > > +static struct clk *clkset_sclk_spdif_list[] = { > + [0] = &clk_sclk_audio0.clk, > + [1] = &clk_sclk_audio1.clk, > + [2] = &clk_sclk_audio2.clk, > + [3] = &clk_spdifextclk, > +}; > + > +static struct clksrc_sources clkset_sclk_spdif = { > + .sources = clkset_sclk_spdif_list, > + .nr_sources = ARRAY_SIZE(clkset_sclk_spdif_list), > +}; > + > +static struct clksrc_clk clk_sclk_spdif = { > + .clk = { > + .name = "sclk_spdif", > + .id = -1, > + .enable = exynos4_clksrc_mask_peril1_ctrl, > + .ctrlbit = (1 << 8), > + .ops = &s5p_sclk_spdif_ops, > + }, > + .sources = &clkset_sclk_spdif, > + .reg_src = { .reg = S5P_CLKSRC_PERIL1, .shift = 8, .size = 2 }, > +}; Hmm...is it possible to move this into struct clksrc_clk clksrcs[] ? > + > static struct clk *clkset_group_list[] = { > [0] = &clk_ext_xtal_mux, > [1] = &clk_xusbxti, > @@ -1206,6 +1240,7 @@ static struct clksrc_clk *sysclks[] = { > &clk_sclk_audio0, > &clk_sclk_audio1, > &clk_sclk_audio2, > + &clk_sclk_spdif, > }; > > static int xtal_rate; > -- > 1.7.2.3 Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add sclk_spdif clocks. 2011-07-18 5:33 ` Kukjin Kim @ 2011-07-18 11:25 ` Naveen Krishna Ch 2011-07-20 9:52 ` Naveen Krishna Ch 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Naveen Krishna Ch @ 2011-07-18 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hi Every one, On 18 July 2011 11:03, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote: > Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote: >> >> Add the sclk_spdif clock is of type 'struct clksrc_clk' clock. >> Also, add clk_spdifextclk clocks of type 'struct clk' clock. >> >> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com> >> --- >> ?arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c | ? 35 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> ?1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c >> index 937335a..feeb27e 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c >> @@ -64,6 +64,11 @@ static struct clk clk_audiocdclk2 = { >> ? ? ? .name ? ? ? ? ? = "audiocdclk", >> ?}; >> >> +static struct clk clk_spdifextclk = { >> + ? ? .name ? ? ? ? ? = "spdif_extclk", >> + ? ? .id ? ? ? ? ? ? = -1, >> +}; >> + >> ?static int exynos4_clksrc_mask_top_ctrl(struct clk *clk, int enable) >> ?{ >> ? ? ? return s5p_gatectrl(S5P_CLKSRC_MASK_TOP, clk, enable); >> @@ -550,6 +555,11 @@ static struct clk init_clocks_off[] = { >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .enable ? ? ? ? = exynos4_clk_ip_peril_ctrl, >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .ctrlbit ? ? ? ?= (1 << 21), >> ? ? ? }, { >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .name ? ? ? ? ? = "spdif", >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .id ? ? ? ? ? ? = -1, >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .enable ? ? ? ? = exynos4_clk_ip_peril_ctrl, >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .ctrlbit ? ? ? ?= (1 << 26), >> + ? ? }, { > > Need to re-work based on clkdev :) Sure, will rebase on updated for-next branch. > >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .name ? ? ? ? ? = "ac97", >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .id ? ? ? ? ? ? = -1, >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .enable ? ? ? ? = exynos4_clk_ip_peril_ctrl, >> @@ -801,6 +811,30 @@ static struct clk init_clocks[] = { >> ? ? ? } >> ?}; >> >> +static struct clk *clkset_sclk_spdif_list[] = { >> + ? ? [0] = &clk_sclk_audio0.clk, >> + ? ? [1] = &clk_sclk_audio1.clk, >> + ? ? [2] = &clk_sclk_audio2.clk, >> + ? ? [3] = &clk_spdifextclk, >> +}; >> + >> +static struct clksrc_sources clkset_sclk_spdif = { >> + ? ? .sources ? ? ? ?= clkset_sclk_spdif_list, >> + ? ? .nr_sources ? ? = ARRAY_SIZE(clkset_sclk_spdif_list), >> +}; >> + >> +static struct clksrc_clk clk_sclk_spdif = { >> + ? ? .clk ? ?= { >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .name ? ? ? ? ? = "sclk_spdif", >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .id ? ? ? ? ? ? = -1, >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .enable ? ? ? ? = exynos4_clksrc_mask_peril1_ctrl, >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .ctrlbit ? ? ? ?= (1 << 8), >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .ops ? ? ? ? ? ?= &s5p_sclk_spdif_ops, >> + ? ? }, >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .sources = &clkset_sclk_spdif, >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .reg_src = { .reg = S5P_CLKSRC_PERIL1, .shift = 8, .size = 2 > }, >> +}; > > Hmm...is it possible to move this into struct clksrc_clk clksrcs[] ? When i try to move it under struct clksrc_clk clksrcs[], I encountered a problem with .ops field The sample code as follows (I'm not sure if i can copy paste the code for RFC) +static struct clk *clkset_sclk_spdif_list[] = { + [0] = &clk_sclk_audio0.clk, + [1] = &clk_sclk_audio1.clk, + [2] = &clk_sclk_audio2.clk, + [3] = &clk_spdifextclk, +}; + +static struct clksrc_sources clkset_sclk_spdif = { + .sources = clkset_sclk_spdif_list, + .nr_sources = ARRAY_SIZE(clkset_sclk_spdif_list), +}; + static struct clk *clkset_group_list[] = { [0] = &clk_ext_xtal_mux, [1] = &clk_xusbxti, @@ -1175,6 +1197,17 @@ static struct clksrc_clk clksrcs[] = { .parent = &clk_sclk_audio2.clk, }, .reg_div = { .reg = S5P_CLKDIV_PERIL4, .shift = 20, .size = 8 }, + }, { + .clk = { + .name = "sclk_spdif", + .id = 0, + .parent = &clk_sclk_audio0.clk, + // .ops = &s5p_sclk_spdif_ops, "When i keep this .ops, The system hangs during boot up. If i don't define the .ops, The WARN_ON would print a stack of call trace for undefined set_rate function" I did not find any set_ops kind off utility functions. Kindly, point me towards any better way of doing the same. + .enable = exynos4_clksrc_mask_peril1_ctrl, + .ctrlbit = (1 << 8), + }, + .sources = &clkset_sclk_spdif, + .reg_src = { .reg = S5P_CLKSRC_PERIL1, .shift = 8, .size = 2 }, }, }; > >> + >> ?static struct clk *clkset_group_list[] = { >> ? ? ? [0] = &clk_ext_xtal_mux, >> ? ? ? [1] = &clk_xusbxti, >> @@ -1206,6 +1240,7 @@ static struct clksrc_clk *sysclks[] = { >> ? ? ? &clk_sclk_audio0, >> ? ? ? &clk_sclk_audio1, >> ? ? ? &clk_sclk_audio2, >> + ? ? &clk_sclk_spdif, >> ?}; >> >> ?static int xtal_rate; >> -- >> 1.7.2.3 > > > Thanks. > > Best regards, > Kgene. > -- > Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer, > SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in > the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at ?http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Shine bright, (: Nav :) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add sclk_spdif clocks. 2011-07-18 11:25 ` Naveen Krishna Ch @ 2011-07-20 9:52 ` Naveen Krishna Ch 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Naveen Krishna Ch @ 2011-07-20 9:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hi Everyone, Any suggestions regarding this below problem. On 18 July 2011 16:55, Naveen Krishna Ch <naveenkrishna.ch@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Every one, > > On 18 July 2011 11:03, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote: >> Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote: >>> >>> Add the sclk_spdif clock is of type 'struct clksrc_clk' clock. >>> Also, add clk_spdifextclk clocks of type 'struct clk' clock. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com> >>> --- >>> ?arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c | ? 35 >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> ?1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c >>> index 937335a..feeb27e 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c >>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c >>> @@ -64,6 +64,11 @@ static struct clk clk_audiocdclk2 = { >>> ? ? ? .name ? ? ? ? ? = "audiocdclk", >>> ?}; >>> >>> +static struct clk clk_spdifextclk = { >>> + ? ? .name ? ? ? ? ? = "spdif_extclk", >>> + ? ? .id ? ? ? ? ? ? = -1, >>> +}; >>> + >>> ?static int exynos4_clksrc_mask_top_ctrl(struct clk *clk, int enable) >>> ?{ >>> ? ? ? return s5p_gatectrl(S5P_CLKSRC_MASK_TOP, clk, enable); >>> @@ -550,6 +555,11 @@ static struct clk init_clocks_off[] = { >>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .enable ? ? ? ? = exynos4_clk_ip_peril_ctrl, >>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .ctrlbit ? ? ? ?= (1 << 21), >>> ? ? ? }, { >>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .name ? ? ? ? ? = "spdif", >>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .id ? ? ? ? ? ? = -1, >>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .enable ? ? ? ? = exynos4_clk_ip_peril_ctrl, >>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .ctrlbit ? ? ? ?= (1 << 26), >>> + ? ? }, { >> >> Need to re-work based on clkdev :) > Sure, will rebase on updated for-next branch. >> >>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .name ? ? ? ? ? = "ac97", >>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .id ? ? ? ? ? ? = -1, >>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .enable ? ? ? ? = exynos4_clk_ip_peril_ctrl, >>> @@ -801,6 +811,30 @@ static struct clk init_clocks[] = { >>> ? ? ? } >>> ?}; >>> >>> +static struct clk *clkset_sclk_spdif_list[] = { >>> + ? ? [0] = &clk_sclk_audio0.clk, >>> + ? ? [1] = &clk_sclk_audio1.clk, >>> + ? ? [2] = &clk_sclk_audio2.clk, >>> + ? ? [3] = &clk_spdifextclk, >>> +}; >>> + >>> +static struct clksrc_sources clkset_sclk_spdif = { >>> + ? ? .sources ? ? ? ?= clkset_sclk_spdif_list, >>> + ? ? .nr_sources ? ? = ARRAY_SIZE(clkset_sclk_spdif_list), >>> +}; >>> + >>> +static struct clksrc_clk clk_sclk_spdif = { >>> + ? ? .clk ? ?= { >>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .name ? ? ? ? ? = "sclk_spdif", >>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .id ? ? ? ? ? ? = -1, >>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .enable ? ? ? ? = exynos4_clksrc_mask_peril1_ctrl, >>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .ctrlbit ? ? ? ?= (1 << 8), >>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .ops ? ? ? ? ? ?= &s5p_sclk_spdif_ops, >>> + ? ? }, >>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .sources = &clkset_sclk_spdif, >>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .reg_src = { .reg = S5P_CLKSRC_PERIL1, .shift = 8, .size = 2 >> }, >>> +}; >> >> Hmm...is it possible to move this into struct clksrc_clk clksrcs[] ? > When i try to move it under struct clksrc_clk clksrcs[], I encountered > a problem with .ops field > The sample code as follows (I'm not sure if i can copy paste the code for RFC) > > +static struct clk *clkset_sclk_spdif_list[] = { > + ? ? ? [0] = &clk_sclk_audio0.clk, > + ? ? ? [1] = &clk_sclk_audio1.clk, > + ? ? ? [2] = &clk_sclk_audio2.clk, > + ? ? ? [3] = &clk_spdifextclk, > +}; > + > +static struct clksrc_sources clkset_sclk_spdif = { > + ? ? ? .sources ? ? ? ?= clkset_sclk_spdif_list, > + ? ? ? .nr_sources ? ? = ARRAY_SIZE(clkset_sclk_spdif_list), > +}; > + > ?static struct clk *clkset_group_list[] = { > ? ? ? ?[0] = &clk_ext_xtal_mux, > ? ? ? ?[1] = &clk_xusbxti, > @@ -1175,6 +1197,17 @@ static struct clksrc_clk clksrcs[] = { > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?.parent ? ? ? ? = &clk_sclk_audio2.clk, > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?}, > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?.reg_div = { .reg = S5P_CLKDIV_PERIL4, .shift = 20, .size = 8 }, > + ? ? ? }, { > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .clk ? ?= { > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .name ? ? ? ? ? = "sclk_spdif", > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .id ? ? ? ? ? ? = 0, > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .parent ? ? ? ? = &clk_sclk_audio0.clk, > + ? ? ? // ? ? ? ? ? ? ?.ops ? ? ? ? ? ?= &s5p_sclk_spdif_ops, > "When i keep this .ops, The system hangs during boot up. > If i don't define the .ops, The WARN_ON would print a stack of call > trace for undefined set_rate function" > I did not find any set_ops kind off utility functions. > > Kindly, point me towards any better way of doing the same. > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .enable ? ? ? ? = exynos4_clksrc_mask_peril1_ctrl, > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .ctrlbit ? ? ? ?= (1 << 8), > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? }, > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .sources = &clkset_sclk_spdif, > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .reg_src = { .reg = S5P_CLKSRC_PERIL1, .shift = 8, .size = 2 }, > ? ? ? ?}, > ?}; > >> >>> + >>> ?static struct clk *clkset_group_list[] = { >>> ? ? ? [0] = &clk_ext_xtal_mux, >>> ? ? ? [1] = &clk_xusbxti, >>> @@ -1206,6 +1240,7 @@ static struct clksrc_clk *sysclks[] = { >>> ? ? ? &clk_sclk_audio0, >>> ? ? ? &clk_sclk_audio1, >>> ? ? ? &clk_sclk_audio2, >>> + ? ? &clk_sclk_spdif, >>> ?}; >>> >>> ?static int xtal_rate; >>> -- >>> 1.7.2.3 >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> Best regards, >> Kgene. >> -- >> Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer, >> SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in >> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at ?http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> > > > > -- > Shine bright, > (: Nav :) > -- Shine bright, (: Nav :) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add EPLL clock operations 2011-06-21 11:24 [PATCH V2 0/3] ARM: Add SPDIF support for EXYNOS4 Naveen Krishna Chatradhi 2011-06-21 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: Samsung: Move duplicate code Naveen Krishna Chatradhi 2011-06-21 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add sclk_spdif clocks Naveen Krishna Chatradhi @ 2011-06-21 11:24 ` Naveen Krishna Chatradhi 2011-06-22 6:51 ` Naveen Krishna Ch 2011-07-18 5:52 ` Kukjin Kim 2011-06-30 5:54 ` [PATCH V2 0/3] ARM: Add SPDIF support for EXYNOS4 Naveen Krishna Ch 3 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi @ 2011-06-21 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel S5PV210 and EXYNOS4 uses similar PLL(PLL46XX) for EPLL. So, The EPLL set rate function is duplicated. Note: Moved common code to plat-s5p, as commented by Kukjin Kim. Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com> --- arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c | 1 + arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c | 78 +--------------------------------- arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h | 3 + 4 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c index feeb27e..7687087 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c @@ -1294,6 +1294,7 @@ void __init_or_cpufreq exynos4_setup_clocks(void) __raw_readl(S5P_VPLL_CON1), pll_4650); clk_fout_apll.ops = &exynos4_fout_apll_ops; + clk_fout_epll.ops = &pll46xx_epll_ops; clk_fout_mpll.rate = mpll; clk_fout_epll.rate = epll; clk_fout_vpll.rate = vpll; diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c index ae72f87..dd77c2c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c @@ -979,82 +979,6 @@ static struct clksrc_clk *sysclks[] = { &clk_sclk_spdif, }; -static u32 epll_div[][6] = { - { 48000000, 0, 48, 3, 3, 0 }, - { 96000000, 0, 48, 3, 2, 0 }, - { 144000000, 1, 72, 3, 2, 0 }, - { 192000000, 0, 48, 3, 1, 0 }, - { 288000000, 1, 72, 3, 1, 0 }, - { 32750000, 1, 65, 3, 4, 35127 }, - { 32768000, 1, 65, 3, 4, 35127 }, - { 45158400, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 }, - { 45000000, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 }, - { 45158000, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 }, - { 49125000, 0, 49, 3, 3, 9961 }, - { 49152000, 0, 49, 3, 3, 9961 }, - { 67737600, 1, 67, 3, 3, 48366 }, - { 67738000, 1, 67, 3, 3, 48366 }, - { 73800000, 1, 73, 3, 3, 47710 }, - { 73728000, 1, 73, 3, 3, 47710 }, - { 36000000, 1, 32, 3, 4, 0 }, - { 60000000, 1, 60, 3, 3, 0 }, - { 72000000, 1, 72, 3, 3, 0 }, - { 80000000, 1, 80, 3, 3, 0 }, - { 84000000, 0, 42, 3, 2, 0 }, - { 50000000, 0, 50, 3, 3, 0 }, -}; - -static int s5pv210_epll_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) -{ - unsigned int epll_con, epll_con_k; - unsigned int i; - - /* Return if nothing changed */ - if (clk->rate == rate) - return 0; - - epll_con = __raw_readl(S5P_EPLL_CON); - epll_con_k = __raw_readl(S5P_EPLL_CON1); - - epll_con_k &= ~PLL46XX_KDIV_MASK; - epll_con &= ~(1 << 27 | - PLL46XX_MDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT | - PLL46XX_PDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT | - PLL46XX_SDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT); - - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(epll_div); i++) { - if (epll_div[i][0] == rate) { - epll_con_k |= epll_div[i][5] << 0; - epll_con |= (epll_div[i][1] << 27 | - epll_div[i][2] << PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT | - epll_div[i][3] << PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT | - epll_div[i][4] << PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT); - break; - } - } - - if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(epll_div)) { - printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Invalid Clock EPLL Frequency\n", - __func__); - return -EINVAL; - } - - __raw_writel(epll_con, S5P_EPLL_CON); - __raw_writel(epll_con_k, S5P_EPLL_CON1); - - printk(KERN_WARNING "EPLL Rate changes from %lu to %lu\n", - clk->rate, rate); - - clk->rate = rate; - - return 0; -} - -static struct clk_ops s5pv210_epll_ops = { - .set_rate = s5pv210_epll_set_rate, - .get_rate = s5p_epll_get_rate, -}; - void __init_or_cpufreq s5pv210_setup_clocks(void) { struct clk *xtal_clk; @@ -1075,7 +999,7 @@ void __init_or_cpufreq s5pv210_setup_clocks(void) /* Set functions for clk_fout_epll */ clk_fout_epll.enable = s5p_epll_enable; - clk_fout_epll.ops = &s5pv210_epll_ops; + clk_fout_epll.ops = &pll46xx_epll_ops; printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: registering clocks\n", __func__); diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c index 02af235..2a4678d 100644 --- a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ #include <mach/regs-clock.h> #include <plat/clock.h> +#include <plat/pll.h> #include <plat/clock-clksrc.h> #include <plat/s5p-clock.h> @@ -203,6 +204,82 @@ struct clk_ops s5p_sclk_spdif_ops = { .get_rate = s5p_spdif_get_rate, }; +static u32 epll_div[][6] = { + { 48000000, 0, 48, 3, 3, 0 }, + { 96000000, 0, 48, 3, 2, 0 }, + { 144000000, 1, 72, 3, 2, 0 }, + { 192000000, 0, 48, 3, 1, 0 }, + { 288000000, 1, 72, 3, 1, 0 }, + { 32750000, 1, 65, 3, 4, 35127 }, + { 32768000, 1, 65, 3, 4, 35127 }, + { 45158400, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 }, + { 45000000, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 }, + { 45158000, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 }, + { 49125000, 0, 49, 3, 3, 9961 }, + { 49152000, 0, 49, 3, 3, 9961 }, + { 67737600, 1, 67, 3, 3, 48366 }, + { 67738000, 1, 67, 3, 3, 48366 }, + { 73800000, 1, 73, 3, 3, 47710 }, + { 73728000, 1, 73, 3, 3, 47710 }, + { 36000000, 1, 32, 3, 4, 0 }, + { 60000000, 1, 60, 3, 3, 0 }, + { 72000000, 1, 72, 3, 3, 0 }, + { 80000000, 1, 80, 3, 3, 0 }, + { 84000000, 0, 42, 3, 2, 0 }, + { 50000000, 0, 50, 3, 3, 0 }, +}; + +int pll46xx_epll_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) +{ + unsigned int epll_con, epll_con_k; + unsigned int i; + + /* Return if nothing changed */ + if (clk->rate == rate) + return 0; + + epll_con = __raw_readl(S5P_EPLL_CON); + epll_con_k = __raw_readl(S5P_EPLL_CON1); + + epll_con_k &= ~PLL46XX_KDIV_MASK; + epll_con &= ~(1 << 27 | + PLL46XX_MDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT | + PLL46XX_PDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT | + PLL46XX_SDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT); + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(epll_div); i++) { + if (epll_div[i][0] == rate) { + epll_con_k |= epll_div[i][5] << 0; + epll_con |= (epll_div[i][1] << 27 | + epll_div[i][2] << PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT | + epll_div[i][3] << PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT | + epll_div[i][4] << PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT); + break; + } + } + + if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(epll_div)) { + printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Invalid Clock EPLL Frequency\n", + __func__); + return -EINVAL; + } + + __raw_writel(epll_con, S5P_EPLL_CON); + __raw_writel(epll_con_k, S5P_EPLL_CON1); + + printk(KERN_WARNING "EPLL Rate changes from %lu to %lu\n", + clk->rate, rate); + + clk->rate = rate; + + return 0; +} + +struct clk_ops pll46xx_epll_ops = { + .set_rate = pll46xx_epll_set_rate, + .get_rate = s5p_epll_get_rate, +}; + static struct clk *s5p_clks[] __initdata = { &clk_ext_xtal_mux, &clk_48m, diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h index bf28fad..911a20e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h @@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ static inline unsigned long s5p_get_pll46xx(unsigned long baseclk, return result; } +extern int pll46xx_epll_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate); +extern struct clk_ops pll46xx_epll_ops; + #define PLL90XX_MDIV_MASK (0xFF) #define PLL90XX_PDIV_MASK (0x3F) #define PLL90XX_SDIV_MASK (0x7) -- 1.7.2.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add EPLL clock operations 2011-06-21 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add EPLL clock operations Naveen Krishna Chatradhi @ 2011-06-22 6:51 ` Naveen Krishna Ch 2011-06-22 8:01 ` Seungwhan Youn 2011-07-18 5:52 ` Kukjin Kim 1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Naveen Krishna Ch @ 2011-06-22 6:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hi Every one, 1. Both S5P6440 and S5P6450 uses PLL90XX for EPLL. However, the same epll_ops is duplicated in the following files arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/clock-s5p6440.c arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/clock-s5p6450.c Please find attached patch which moves it to the common clock.c Attachment: "0001-ARM-S5P64X0-Move-duplicated-epll-code.patch" 2. Also, S5PV210, C110, C100, 6450/6440 and EXYNOS4 define their own epll_ops. The following attachment consolidates the same on the basis of PLL types "Eg: PLL90XX. PLL46XX, PLL45XX and PLL65XX" Kindly, review the approach and comment. Attachment: "0001-ARM-Samsung-organize-duplicated-EPLL-code.patch" Thanks & Best regards, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi On 21 June 2011 16:54, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com> wrote: > S5PV210 and EXYNOS4 uses similar PLL(PLL46XX) for EPLL. > So, The EPLL set rate function is duplicated. > > Note: Moved common code to plat-s5p, as commented by Kukjin Kim. > > Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com> > --- > ?arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c ? ? ? ?| ? ?1 + > ?arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c ? ? ? ?| ? 78 +--------------------------------- > ?arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > ?arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h | ? ?3 + > ?4 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c > index feeb27e..7687087 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c > @@ -1294,6 +1294,7 @@ void __init_or_cpufreq exynos4_setup_clocks(void) > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?__raw_readl(S5P_VPLL_CON1), pll_4650); > > ? ? ? ?clk_fout_apll.ops = &exynos4_fout_apll_ops; > + ? ? ? clk_fout_epll.ops = &pll46xx_epll_ops; > ? ? ? ?clk_fout_mpll.rate = mpll; > ? ? ? ?clk_fout_epll.rate = epll; > ? ? ? ?clk_fout_vpll.rate = vpll; > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c > index ae72f87..dd77c2c 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c > @@ -979,82 +979,6 @@ static struct clksrc_clk *sysclks[] = { > ? ? ? ?&clk_sclk_spdif, > ?}; > > -static u32 epll_div[][6] = { > - ? ? ? { ?48000000, 0, 48, 3, 3, 0 }, > - ? ? ? { ?96000000, 0, 48, 3, 2, 0 }, > - ? ? ? { 144000000, 1, 72, 3, 2, 0 }, > - ? ? ? { 192000000, 0, 48, 3, 1, 0 }, > - ? ? ? { 288000000, 1, 72, 3, 1, 0 }, > - ? ? ? { ?32750000, 1, 65, 3, 4, 35127 }, > - ? ? ? { ?32768000, 1, 65, 3, 4, 35127 }, > - ? ? ? { ?45158400, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 }, > - ? ? ? { ?45000000, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 }, > - ? ? ? { ?45158000, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 }, > - ? ? ? { ?49125000, 0, 49, 3, 3, 9961 }, > - ? ? ? { ?49152000, 0, 49, 3, 3, 9961 }, > - ? ? ? { ?67737600, 1, 67, 3, 3, 48366 }, > - ? ? ? { ?67738000, 1, 67, 3, 3, 48366 }, > - ? ? ? { ?73800000, 1, 73, 3, 3, 47710 }, > - ? ? ? { ?73728000, 1, 73, 3, 3, 47710 }, > - ? ? ? { ?36000000, 1, 32, 3, 4, 0 }, > - ? ? ? { ?60000000, 1, 60, 3, 3, 0 }, > - ? ? ? { ?72000000, 1, 72, 3, 3, 0 }, > - ? ? ? { ?80000000, 1, 80, 3, 3, 0 }, > - ? ? ? { ?84000000, 0, 42, 3, 2, 0 }, > - ? ? ? { ?50000000, 0, 50, 3, 3, 0 }, > -}; > - > -static int s5pv210_epll_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) > -{ > - ? ? ? unsigned int epll_con, epll_con_k; > - ? ? ? unsigned int i; > - > - ? ? ? /* Return if nothing changed */ > - ? ? ? if (clk->rate == rate) > - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return 0; > - > - ? ? ? epll_con = __raw_readl(S5P_EPLL_CON); > - ? ? ? epll_con_k = __raw_readl(S5P_EPLL_CON1); > - > - ? ? ? epll_con_k &= ~PLL46XX_KDIV_MASK; > - ? ? ? epll_con &= ~(1 << 27 | > - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? PLL46XX_MDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT | > - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? PLL46XX_PDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT | > - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? PLL46XX_SDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT); > - > - ? ? ? for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(epll_div); i++) { > - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (epll_div[i][0] == rate) { > - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? epll_con_k |= epll_div[i][5] << 0; > - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? epll_con |= (epll_div[i][1] << 27 | > - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? epll_div[i][2] << PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT | > - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? epll_div[i][3] << PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT | > - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? epll_div[i][4] << PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT); > - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? break; > - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? } > - ? ? ? } > - > - ? ? ? if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(epll_div)) { > - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Invalid Clock EPLL Frequency\n", > - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? __func__); > - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return -EINVAL; > - ? ? ? } > - > - ? ? ? __raw_writel(epll_con, S5P_EPLL_CON); > - ? ? ? __raw_writel(epll_con_k, S5P_EPLL_CON1); > - > - ? ? ? printk(KERN_WARNING "EPLL Rate changes from %lu to %lu\n", > - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? clk->rate, rate); > - > - ? ? ? clk->rate = rate; > - > - ? ? ? return 0; > -} > - > -static struct clk_ops s5pv210_epll_ops = { > - ? ? ? .set_rate = s5pv210_epll_set_rate, > - ? ? ? .get_rate = s5p_epll_get_rate, > -}; > - > ?void __init_or_cpufreq s5pv210_setup_clocks(void) > ?{ > ? ? ? ?struct clk *xtal_clk; > @@ -1075,7 +999,7 @@ void __init_or_cpufreq s5pv210_setup_clocks(void) > > ? ? ? ?/* Set functions for clk_fout_epll */ > ? ? ? ?clk_fout_epll.enable = s5p_epll_enable; > - ? ? ? clk_fout_epll.ops = &s5pv210_epll_ops; > + ? ? ? clk_fout_epll.ops = &pll46xx_epll_ops; > > ? ? ? ?printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: registering clocks\n", __func__); > > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c > index 02af235..2a4678d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ > ?#include <mach/regs-clock.h> > > ?#include <plat/clock.h> > +#include <plat/pll.h> > ?#include <plat/clock-clksrc.h> > ?#include <plat/s5p-clock.h> > > @@ -203,6 +204,82 @@ struct clk_ops s5p_sclk_spdif_ops = { > ? ? ? ?.get_rate ? ? ? = s5p_spdif_get_rate, > ?}; > > +static u32 epll_div[][6] = { > + ? ? ? { ?48000000, 0, 48, 3, 3, 0 }, > + ? ? ? { ?96000000, 0, 48, 3, 2, 0 }, > + ? ? ? { 144000000, 1, 72, 3, 2, 0 }, > + ? ? ? { 192000000, 0, 48, 3, 1, 0 }, > + ? ? ? { 288000000, 1, 72, 3, 1, 0 }, > + ? ? ? { ?32750000, 1, 65, 3, 4, 35127 }, > + ? ? ? { ?32768000, 1, 65, 3, 4, 35127 }, > + ? ? ? { ?45158400, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 }, > + ? ? ? { ?45000000, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 }, > + ? ? ? { ?45158000, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 }, > + ? ? ? { ?49125000, 0, 49, 3, 3, 9961 }, > + ? ? ? { ?49152000, 0, 49, 3, 3, 9961 }, > + ? ? ? { ?67737600, 1, 67, 3, 3, 48366 }, > + ? ? ? { ?67738000, 1, 67, 3, 3, 48366 }, > + ? ? ? { ?73800000, 1, 73, 3, 3, 47710 }, > + ? ? ? { ?73728000, 1, 73, 3, 3, 47710 }, > + ? ? ? { ?36000000, 1, 32, 3, 4, 0 }, > + ? ? ? { ?60000000, 1, 60, 3, 3, 0 }, > + ? ? ? { ?72000000, 1, 72, 3, 3, 0 }, > + ? ? ? { ?80000000, 1, 80, 3, 3, 0 }, > + ? ? ? { ?84000000, 0, 42, 3, 2, 0 }, > + ? ? ? { ?50000000, 0, 50, 3, 3, 0 }, > +}; > + > +int pll46xx_epll_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) > +{ > + ? ? ? unsigned int epll_con, epll_con_k; > + ? ? ? unsigned int i; > + > + ? ? ? /* Return if nothing changed */ > + ? ? ? if (clk->rate == rate) > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return 0; > + > + ? ? ? epll_con = __raw_readl(S5P_EPLL_CON); > + ? ? ? epll_con_k = __raw_readl(S5P_EPLL_CON1); > + > + ? ? ? epll_con_k &= ~PLL46XX_KDIV_MASK; > + ? ? ? epll_con &= ~(1 << 27 | > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? PLL46XX_MDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT | > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? PLL46XX_PDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT | > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? PLL46XX_SDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT); > + > + ? ? ? for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(epll_div); i++) { > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (epll_div[i][0] == rate) { > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? epll_con_k |= epll_div[i][5] << 0; > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? epll_con |= (epll_div[i][1] << 27 | > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? epll_div[i][2] << PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT | > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? epll_div[i][3] << PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT | > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? epll_div[i][4] << PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT); > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? break; > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? } > + ? ? ? } > + > + ? ? ? if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(epll_div)) { > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Invalid Clock EPLL Frequency\n", > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? __func__); > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return -EINVAL; > + ? ? ? } > + > + ? ? ? __raw_writel(epll_con, S5P_EPLL_CON); > + ? ? ? __raw_writel(epll_con_k, S5P_EPLL_CON1); > + > + ? ? ? printk(KERN_WARNING "EPLL Rate changes from %lu to %lu\n", > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? clk->rate, rate); > + > + ? ? ? clk->rate = rate; > + > + ? ? ? return 0; > +} > + > +struct clk_ops pll46xx_epll_ops = { > + ? ? ? .set_rate = pll46xx_epll_set_rate, > + ? ? ? .get_rate = s5p_epll_get_rate, > +}; > + > ?static struct clk *s5p_clks[] __initdata = { > ? ? ? ?&clk_ext_xtal_mux, > ? ? ? ?&clk_48m, > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h > index bf28fad..911a20e 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h > @@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ static inline unsigned long s5p_get_pll46xx(unsigned long baseclk, > ? ? ? ?return result; > ?} > > +extern int pll46xx_epll_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate); > +extern struct clk_ops pll46xx_epll_ops; > + > ?#define PLL90XX_MDIV_MASK ? ? ?(0xFF) > ?#define PLL90XX_PDIV_MASK ? ? ?(0x3F) > ?#define PLL90XX_SDIV_MASK ? ? ?(0x7) > -- > 1.7.2.3 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in > the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at ?http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Shine bright, (: Nav :) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-ARM-S5P64X0-Move-duplicated-epll-code.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 7901 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20110622/a315f4a7/attachment-0002.obj> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-ARM-Samsung-organize-duplicated-EPLL-code.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 30605 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20110622/a315f4a7/attachment-0003.obj> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add EPLL clock operations 2011-06-22 6:51 ` Naveen Krishna Ch @ 2011-06-22 8:01 ` Seungwhan Youn 2011-06-30 5:51 ` Naveen Krishna Ch 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Seungwhan Youn @ 2011-06-22 8:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hi Naveen, On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Naveen Krishna Ch <naveenkrishna.ch@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Every one, > > 1. Both S5P6440 and S5P6450 uses PLL90XX for EPLL. > ?However, the same epll_ops is duplicated in the following files > ?arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/clock-s5p6440.c > ?arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/clock-s5p6450.c > > ?Please find attached patch which moves it to the common clock.c > ?Attachment: "0001-ARM-S5P64X0-Move-duplicated-epll-code.patch" > > 2. Also, S5PV210, C110, C100, 6450/6440 and EXYNOS4 define their own > ?epll_ops. > > ?The following attachment consolidates the same on the basis of PLL types > ?"Eg: PLL90XX. PLL46XX, PLL45XX and PLL65XX" > > ?Kindly, review the approach and comment. > ?Attachment: "0001-ARM-Samsung-organize-duplicated-EPLL-code.patch" I think this is a good try to clean-up Samsung platform's PLL settings. :) But one thing that I concern is 'epll_div' values are not a common value, it depends on board because of these values come from outer xtl which was selected by OM on board side. So, I wonder if you want to make PLL as a common platform, you may solve these 'epll_div' values to be correct. For example, you may calculate 'epll_div' values with formula which is in user manual or set 'epll_div' values in board specific file not platform file. claude ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add EPLL clock operations 2011-06-22 8:01 ` Seungwhan Youn @ 2011-06-30 5:51 ` Naveen Krishna Ch 2011-06-30 7:28 ` Seungwhan Youn 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Naveen Krishna Ch @ 2011-06-30 5:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hi Seungwhan, On 22 June 2011 13:31, Seungwhan Youn <claude.youn@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Naveen, > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Naveen Krishna Ch > <naveenkrishna.ch@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Every one, >> >> 1. Both S5P6440 and S5P6450 uses PLL90XX for EPLL. >> ?However, the same epll_ops is duplicated in the following files >> ?arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/clock-s5p6440.c >> ?arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/clock-s5p6450.c >> >> ?Please find attached patch which moves it to the common clock.c >> ?Attachment: "0001-ARM-S5P64X0-Move-duplicated-epll-code.patch" >> >> 2. Also, S5PV210, C110, C100, 6450/6440 and EXYNOS4 define their own >> ?epll_ops. >> >> ?The following attachment consolidates the same on the basis of PLL types >> ?"Eg: PLL90XX. PLL46XX, PLL45XX and PLL65XX" >> >> ?Kindly, review the approach and comment. >> ?Attachment: "0001-ARM-Samsung-organize-duplicated-EPLL-code.patch" > > I think this is a good try to clean-up Samsung platform's PLL settings. :) > But one thing that I concern is 'epll_div' values are not a common > value, it depends on board because of these values come from outer xtl > which was selected by OM on board side. So, I wonder if you want to > make PLL as a common platform, you may solve these 'epll_div' values > to be correct. For example, you may calculate 'epll_div' values with > formula which is in user manual or set 'epll_div' values in board > specific file not platform file. Thanks for your comments. So far i was not lucky in finding out a generic way of deriving the epll_div values. And it doesn't seem to 1. Save lines of code or 2. Consolidate the PLL code. Any suggestions for a simpler implementation are welcome. > > ? ? ? ?claude > -- Shine bright, (: Nav :) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add EPLL clock operations 2011-06-30 5:51 ` Naveen Krishna Ch @ 2011-06-30 7:28 ` Seungwhan Youn 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Seungwhan Youn @ 2011-06-30 7:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel > So far i was not lucky in finding out a generic way of deriving the > epll_div values. > And it doesn't seem to > 1. Save lines of code or > 2. Consolidate the PLL code. > > Any suggestions for a simpler implementation are welcome. No, I mean that 'epll_div' values are _not_always_correct_ on Samsung SoC platform. It depends on board setting. That 'epll_div' values only works fine when FINpll is 24MHz, as you know these're from reference values on User Manual, and board maker can change FINpll freq. with OM[0] pin setting, XXTI and XusbXTI. So. if you want to make consolidate the PLL code, you should make a general formula to calculate that epll_div values on the fly OR move 'epll_div' values table into somewhere machine specific file, not into platform file 'arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c'. claude ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add EPLL clock operations 2011-06-21 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add EPLL clock operations Naveen Krishna Chatradhi 2011-06-22 6:51 ` Naveen Krishna Ch @ 2011-07-18 5:52 ` Kukjin Kim 2011-07-18 11:44 ` Naveen Krishna Ch 1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Kukjin Kim @ 2011-07-18 5:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote: > > S5PV210 and EXYNOS4 uses similar PLL(PLL46XX) for EPLL. > So, The EPLL set rate function is duplicated. > > Note: Moved common code to plat-s5p, as commented by Kukjin Kim. > Since if you want to keep this in git log, this should be moved after below '---' :( > Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com> > --- > arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c | 1 + > arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c | 78 +--------------------------------- > arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c | 77 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h | 3 + > 4 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c > index feeb27e..7687087 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c > @@ -1294,6 +1294,7 @@ void __init_or_cpufreq exynos4_setup_clocks(void) > __raw_readl(S5P_VPLL_CON1), pll_4650); > > clk_fout_apll.ops = &exynos4_fout_apll_ops; > + clk_fout_epll.ops = &pll46xx_epll_ops; > clk_fout_mpll.rate = mpll; > clk_fout_epll.rate = epll; > clk_fout_vpll.rate = vpll; > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c > index ae72f87..dd77c2c 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c > @@ -979,82 +979,6 @@ static struct clksrc_clk *sysclks[] = { > &clk_sclk_spdif, > }; > > -static u32 epll_div[][6] = { > - { 48000000, 0, 48, 3, 3, 0 }, > - { 96000000, 0, 48, 3, 2, 0 }, > - { 144000000, 1, 72, 3, 2, 0 }, > - { 192000000, 0, 48, 3, 1, 0 }, > - { 288000000, 1, 72, 3, 1, 0 }, > - { 32750000, 1, 65, 3, 4, 35127 }, > - { 32768000, 1, 65, 3, 4, 35127 }, > - { 45158400, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 }, > - { 45000000, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 }, > - { 45158000, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 }, > - { 49125000, 0, 49, 3, 3, 9961 }, > - { 49152000, 0, 49, 3, 3, 9961 }, > - { 67737600, 1, 67, 3, 3, 48366 }, > - { 67738000, 1, 67, 3, 3, 48366 }, > - { 73800000, 1, 73, 3, 3, 47710 }, > - { 73728000, 1, 73, 3, 3, 47710 }, > - { 36000000, 1, 32, 3, 4, 0 }, > - { 60000000, 1, 60, 3, 3, 0 }, > - { 72000000, 1, 72, 3, 3, 0 }, > - { 80000000, 1, 80, 3, 3, 0 }, > - { 84000000, 0, 42, 3, 2, 0 }, > - { 50000000, 0, 50, 3, 3, 0 }, > -}; > - > -static int s5pv210_epll_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) > -{ > - unsigned int epll_con, epll_con_k; > - unsigned int i; > - > - /* Return if nothing changed */ > - if (clk->rate == rate) > - return 0; > - > - epll_con = __raw_readl(S5P_EPLL_CON); > - epll_con_k = __raw_readl(S5P_EPLL_CON1); > - > - epll_con_k &= ~PLL46XX_KDIV_MASK; > - epll_con &= ~(1 << 27 | > - PLL46XX_MDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT | > - PLL46XX_PDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT | > - PLL46XX_SDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT); > - > - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(epll_div); i++) { > - if (epll_div[i][0] == rate) { > - epll_con_k |= epll_div[i][5] << 0; > - epll_con |= (epll_div[i][1] << 27 | > - epll_div[i][2] << > PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT | > - epll_div[i][3] << > PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT | > - epll_div[i][4] << > PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT); > - break; > - } > - } > - > - if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(epll_div)) { > - printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Invalid Clock EPLL Frequency\n", > - __func__); > - return -EINVAL; > - } > - > - __raw_writel(epll_con, S5P_EPLL_CON); > - __raw_writel(epll_con_k, S5P_EPLL_CON1); > - > - printk(KERN_WARNING "EPLL Rate changes from %lu to %lu\n", > - clk->rate, rate); > - > - clk->rate = rate; > - > - return 0; > -} > - > -static struct clk_ops s5pv210_epll_ops = { > - .set_rate = s5pv210_epll_set_rate, > - .get_rate = s5p_epll_get_rate, > -}; > - > void __init_or_cpufreq s5pv210_setup_clocks(void) > { > struct clk *xtal_clk; > @@ -1075,7 +999,7 @@ void __init_or_cpufreq s5pv210_setup_clocks(void) > > /* Set functions for clk_fout_epll */ > clk_fout_epll.enable = s5p_epll_enable; > - clk_fout_epll.ops = &s5pv210_epll_ops; > + clk_fout_epll.ops = &pll46xx_epll_ops; > > printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: registering clocks\n", __func__); > > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c > index 02af235..2a4678d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ > #include <mach/regs-clock.h> > > #include <plat/clock.h> > +#include <plat/pll.h> > #include <plat/clock-clksrc.h> > #include <plat/s5p-clock.h> > > @@ -203,6 +204,82 @@ struct clk_ops s5p_sclk_spdif_ops = { > .get_rate = s5p_spdif_get_rate, > }; > > +static u32 epll_div[][6] = { > + { 48000000, 0, 48, 3, 3, 0 }, > + { 96000000, 0, 48, 3, 2, 0 }, > + { 144000000, 1, 72, 3, 2, 0 }, > + { 192000000, 0, 48, 3, 1, 0 }, > + { 288000000, 1, 72, 3, 1, 0 }, > + { 32750000, 1, 65, 3, 4, 35127 }, > + { 32768000, 1, 65, 3, 4, 35127 }, > + { 45158400, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 }, > + { 45000000, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 }, > + { 45158000, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 }, > + { 49125000, 0, 49, 3, 3, 9961 }, > + { 49152000, 0, 49, 3, 3, 9961 }, > + { 67737600, 1, 67, 3, 3, 48366 }, > + { 67738000, 1, 67, 3, 3, 48366 }, > + { 73800000, 1, 73, 3, 3, 47710 }, > + { 73728000, 1, 73, 3, 3, 47710 }, > + { 36000000, 1, 32, 3, 4, 0 }, > + { 60000000, 1, 60, 3, 3, 0 }, > + { 72000000, 1, 72, 3, 3, 0 }, > + { 80000000, 1, 80, 3, 3, 0 }, > + { 84000000, 0, 42, 3, 2, 0 }, > + { 50000000, 0, 50, 3, 3, 0 }, > +}; Hmm, ok for now. But as Seungwhan Youn said, you have to know it can be changed according to input clock for EPLL when you add this into common plat-s5p. > + > +int pll46xx_epll_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) How about to move this in plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h like other pll helper functions? > +{ > + unsigned int epll_con, epll_con_k; > + unsigned int i; > + > + /* Return if nothing changed */ > + if (clk->rate == rate) > + return 0; > + > + epll_con = __raw_readl(S5P_EPLL_CON); > + epll_con_k = __raw_readl(S5P_EPLL_CON1); > + > + epll_con_k &= ~PLL46XX_KDIV_MASK; > + epll_con &= ~(1 << 27 | > + PLL46XX_MDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT | > + PLL46XX_PDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT | > + PLL46XX_SDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT); > + > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(epll_div); i++) { > + if (epll_div[i][0] == rate) { > + epll_con_k |= epll_div[i][5] << 0; > + epll_con |= (epll_div[i][1] << 27 | > + epll_div[i][2] << > PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT | > + epll_div[i][3] << > PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT | > + epll_div[i][4] << > PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT); > + break; > + } > + } > + > + if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(epll_div)) { > + printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Invalid Clock EPLL Frequency\n", > + __func__); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + __raw_writel(epll_con, S5P_EPLL_CON); > + __raw_writel(epll_con_k, S5P_EPLL_CON1); Basically, need to add check of pll locking after changing PLL value. > + > + printk(KERN_WARNING "EPLL Rate changes from %lu to %lu\n", > + clk->rate, rate); > + > + clk->rate = rate; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +struct clk_ops pll46xx_epll_ops = { > + .set_rate = pll46xx_epll_set_rate, > + .get_rate = s5p_epll_get_rate, I'm not sure we need .get_rate here. Could you please test without this? > +}; > + > static struct clk *s5p_clks[] __initdata = { > &clk_ext_xtal_mux, > &clk_48m, > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h > index bf28fad..911a20e 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h > @@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ static inline unsigned long s5p_get_pll46xx(unsigned long > baseclk, > return result; > } > > +extern int pll46xx_epll_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate); > +extern struct clk_ops pll46xx_epll_ops; > + > #define PLL90XX_MDIV_MASK (0xFF) > #define PLL90XX_PDIV_MASK (0x3F) > #define PLL90XX_SDIV_MASK (0x7) > -- > 1.7.2.3 Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add EPLL clock operations 2011-07-18 5:52 ` Kukjin Kim @ 2011-07-18 11:44 ` Naveen Krishna Ch 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Naveen Krishna Ch @ 2011-07-18 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hi Every one, On 18 July 2011 11:22, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote: > Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote: >> >> S5PV210 and EXYNOS4 uses similar PLL(PLL46XX) for EPLL. >> So, The EPLL set rate function is duplicated. >> >> Note: Moved common code to plat-s5p, as commented by Kukjin Kim. >> > Since if you want to keep this in git log, this should be moved after below > '---' :( Thanks for pointing. > >> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com> >> --- >> ?arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c ? ? ? ?| ? ?1 + >> ?arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c ? ? ? ?| ? 78 > +--------------------------------- >> ?arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? 77 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> ?arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h | ? ?3 + >> ?4 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c >> index feeb27e..7687087 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c >> @@ -1294,6 +1294,7 @@ void __init_or_cpufreq exynos4_setup_clocks(void) >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? __raw_readl(S5P_VPLL_CON1), pll_4650); >> >> ? ? ? clk_fout_apll.ops = &exynos4_fout_apll_ops; >> + ? ? clk_fout_epll.ops = &pll46xx_epll_ops; >> ? ? ? clk_fout_mpll.rate = mpll; >> ? ? ? clk_fout_epll.rate = epll; >> ? ? ? clk_fout_vpll.rate = vpll; >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c >> index ae72f87..dd77c2c 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c >> @@ -979,82 +979,6 @@ static struct clksrc_clk *sysclks[] = { >> ? ? ? &clk_sclk_spdif, >> ?}; >> >> -static u32 epll_div[][6] = { >> - ? ? { ?48000000, 0, 48, 3, 3, 0 }, >> - ? ? { ?96000000, 0, 48, 3, 2, 0 }, >> - ? ? { 144000000, 1, 72, 3, 2, 0 }, >> - ? ? { 192000000, 0, 48, 3, 1, 0 }, >> - ? ? { 288000000, 1, 72, 3, 1, 0 }, >> - ? ? { ?32750000, 1, 65, 3, 4, 35127 }, >> - ? ? { ?32768000, 1, 65, 3, 4, 35127 }, >> - ? ? { ?45158400, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 }, >> - ? ? { ?45000000, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 }, >> - ? ? { ?45158000, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 }, >> - ? ? { ?49125000, 0, 49, 3, 3, 9961 }, >> - ? ? { ?49152000, 0, 49, 3, 3, 9961 }, >> - ? ? { ?67737600, 1, 67, 3, 3, 48366 }, >> - ? ? { ?67738000, 1, 67, 3, 3, 48366 }, >> - ? ? { ?73800000, 1, 73, 3, 3, 47710 }, >> - ? ? { ?73728000, 1, 73, 3, 3, 47710 }, >> - ? ? { ?36000000, 1, 32, 3, 4, 0 }, >> - ? ? { ?60000000, 1, 60, 3, 3, 0 }, >> - ? ? { ?72000000, 1, 72, 3, 3, 0 }, >> - ? ? { ?80000000, 1, 80, 3, 3, 0 }, >> - ? ? { ?84000000, 0, 42, 3, 2, 0 }, >> - ? ? { ?50000000, 0, 50, 3, 3, 0 }, >> -}; >> - >> -static int s5pv210_epll_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) >> -{ >> - ? ? unsigned int epll_con, epll_con_k; >> - ? ? unsigned int i; >> - >> - ? ? /* Return if nothing changed */ >> - ? ? if (clk->rate == rate) >> - ? ? ? ? ? ? return 0; >> - >> - ? ? epll_con = __raw_readl(S5P_EPLL_CON); >> - ? ? epll_con_k = __raw_readl(S5P_EPLL_CON1); >> - >> - ? ? epll_con_k &= ~PLL46XX_KDIV_MASK; >> - ? ? epll_con &= ~(1 << 27 | >> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? PLL46XX_MDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT | >> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? PLL46XX_PDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT | >> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? PLL46XX_SDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT); >> - >> - ? ? for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(epll_div); i++) { >> - ? ? ? ? ? ? if (epll_div[i][0] == rate) { >> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? epll_con_k |= epll_div[i][5] << 0; >> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? epll_con |= (epll_div[i][1] << 27 | >> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? epll_div[i][2] << >> PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT | >> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? epll_div[i][3] << >> PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT | >> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? epll_div[i][4] << >> PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT); >> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? break; >> - ? ? ? ? ? ? } >> - ? ? } >> - >> - ? ? if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(epll_div)) { >> - ? ? ? ? ? ? printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Invalid Clock EPLL Frequency\n", >> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? __func__); >> - ? ? ? ? ? ? return -EINVAL; >> - ? ? } >> - >> - ? ? __raw_writel(epll_con, S5P_EPLL_CON); >> - ? ? __raw_writel(epll_con_k, S5P_EPLL_CON1); >> - >> - ? ? printk(KERN_WARNING "EPLL Rate changes from %lu to %lu\n", >> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? clk->rate, rate); >> - >> - ? ? clk->rate = rate; >> - >> - ? ? return 0; >> -} >> - >> -static struct clk_ops s5pv210_epll_ops = { >> - ? ? .set_rate = s5pv210_epll_set_rate, >> - ? ? .get_rate = s5p_epll_get_rate, >> -}; >> - >> ?void __init_or_cpufreq s5pv210_setup_clocks(void) >> ?{ >> ? ? ? struct clk *xtal_clk; >> @@ -1075,7 +999,7 @@ void __init_or_cpufreq s5pv210_setup_clocks(void) >> >> ? ? ? /* Set functions for clk_fout_epll */ >> ? ? ? clk_fout_epll.enable = s5p_epll_enable; >> - ? ? clk_fout_epll.ops = &s5pv210_epll_ops; >> + ? ? clk_fout_epll.ops = &pll46xx_epll_ops; >> >> ? ? ? printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: registering clocks\n", __func__); >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c >> index 02af235..2a4678d 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c >> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ >> ?#include <mach/regs-clock.h> >> >> ?#include <plat/clock.h> >> +#include <plat/pll.h> >> ?#include <plat/clock-clksrc.h> >> ?#include <plat/s5p-clock.h> >> >> @@ -203,6 +204,82 @@ struct clk_ops s5p_sclk_spdif_ops = { >> ? ? ? .get_rate ? ? ? = s5p_spdif_get_rate, >> ?}; >> >> +static u32 epll_div[][6] = { >> + ? ? { ?48000000, 0, 48, 3, 3, 0 }, >> + ? ? { ?96000000, 0, 48, 3, 2, 0 }, >> + ? ? { 144000000, 1, 72, 3, 2, 0 }, >> + ? ? { 192000000, 0, 48, 3, 1, 0 }, >> + ? ? { 288000000, 1, 72, 3, 1, 0 }, >> + ? ? { ?32750000, 1, 65, 3, 4, 35127 }, >> + ? ? { ?32768000, 1, 65, 3, 4, 35127 }, >> + ? ? { ?45158400, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 }, >> + ? ? { ?45000000, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 }, >> + ? ? { ?45158000, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 }, >> + ? ? { ?49125000, 0, 49, 3, 3, 9961 }, >> + ? ? { ?49152000, 0, 49, 3, 3, 9961 }, >> + ? ? { ?67737600, 1, 67, 3, 3, 48366 }, >> + ? ? { ?67738000, 1, 67, 3, 3, 48366 }, >> + ? ? { ?73800000, 1, 73, 3, 3, 47710 }, >> + ? ? { ?73728000, 1, 73, 3, 3, 47710 }, >> + ? ? { ?36000000, 1, 32, 3, 4, 0 }, >> + ? ? { ?60000000, 1, 60, 3, 3, 0 }, >> + ? ? { ?72000000, 1, 72, 3, 3, 0 }, >> + ? ? { ?80000000, 1, 80, 3, 3, 0 }, >> + ? ? { ?84000000, 0, 42, 3, 2, 0 }, >> + ? ? { ?50000000, 0, 50, 3, 3, 0 }, >> +}; > > Hmm, ok for now. But as Seungwhan Youn said, you have to know it can be > changed according to input clock for EPLL when you add this into common > plat-s5p. As mentioned earlier, I've not found any generic formula for using across boards. So, I dropped the plan for moving it to plat-s5p for all boards. This patch only applies only for S5PV210 and EXYNOS4, The epll_div values are same as per the latest User Manuals for S5PV210 and EXYNOS4. Sorry for the mess, attaching a patch for RFC have caused. > >> + >> +int pll46xx_epll_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) > > How about to move this in plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h like other pll helper > functions? Isn't it wrong for the helper functions to use raw_readl and raw_writel functions ?? > >> +{ >> + ? ? unsigned int epll_con, epll_con_k; >> + ? ? unsigned int i; >> + >> + ? ? /* Return if nothing changed */ >> + ? ? if (clk->rate == rate) >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? return 0; >> + >> + ? ? epll_con = __raw_readl(S5P_EPLL_CON); >> + ? ? epll_con_k = __raw_readl(S5P_EPLL_CON1); >> + >> + ? ? epll_con_k &= ~PLL46XX_KDIV_MASK; >> + ? ? epll_con &= ~(1 << 27 | >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? PLL46XX_MDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT | >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? PLL46XX_PDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT | >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? PLL46XX_SDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT); >> + >> + ? ? for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(epll_div); i++) { >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? if (epll_div[i][0] == rate) { >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? epll_con_k |= epll_div[i][5] << 0; >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? epll_con |= (epll_div[i][1] << 27 | >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? epll_div[i][2] << >> PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT | >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? epll_div[i][3] << >> PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT | >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? epll_div[i][4] << >> PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT); >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? break; >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? } >> + ? ? } >> + >> + ? ? if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(epll_div)) { >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Invalid Clock EPLL Frequency\n", >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? __func__); >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? return -EINVAL; >> + ? ? } >> + >> + ? ? __raw_writel(epll_con, S5P_EPLL_CON); >> + ? ? __raw_writel(epll_con_k, S5P_EPLL_CON1); > > Basically, need to add check of pll locking after changing PLL value. Yes, i understand. It was a simple code movement, Will apply locking in next version of patch set. > >> + >> + ? ? printk(KERN_WARNING "EPLL Rate changes from %lu to %lu\n", >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? clk->rate, rate); >> + >> + ? ? clk->rate = rate; >> + >> + ? ? return 0; >> +} >> + >> +struct clk_ops pll46xx_epll_ops = { >> + ? ? .set_rate = pll46xx_epll_set_rate, >> + ? ? .get_rate = s5p_epll_get_rate, > > I'm not sure we need .get_rate here. > Could you please test without this? I've followed the legacy code, get_rate is never used,. yes will remove in the next version. > >> +}; >> + >> ?static struct clk *s5p_clks[] __initdata = { >> ? ? ? &clk_ext_xtal_mux, >> ? ? ? &clk_48m, >> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h > b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h >> index bf28fad..911a20e 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h >> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h >> @@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ static inline unsigned long s5p_get_pll46xx(unsigned > long >> baseclk, >> ? ? ? return result; >> ?} >> >> +extern int pll46xx_epll_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate); >> +extern struct clk_ops pll46xx_epll_ops; >> + >> ?#define PLL90XX_MDIV_MASK ? ?(0xFF) >> ?#define PLL90XX_PDIV_MASK ? ?(0x3F) >> ?#define PLL90XX_SDIV_MASK ? ?(0x7) >> -- >> 1.7.2.3 > > Thanks. > > Best regards, > Kgene. > -- > Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer, > SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in > the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at ?http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Shine bright, (: Nav :) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH V2 0/3] ARM: Add SPDIF support for EXYNOS4 2011-06-21 11:24 [PATCH V2 0/3] ARM: Add SPDIF support for EXYNOS4 Naveen Krishna Chatradhi ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2011-06-21 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add EPLL clock operations Naveen Krishna Chatradhi @ 2011-06-30 5:54 ` Naveen Krishna Ch 3 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Naveen Krishna Ch @ 2011-06-30 5:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hi Everyone, I would like to know if there are any comments or modifications required in the following patchset. On 21 June 2011 16:54, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com> wrote: > ?o To Kukjin Kim, Sangbeom Kim, Jassi Brar and Seungwhan Youn > > [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: Samsung: Move duplicate code > ?o This is a prerequisite for 2/3 and 3/3 patches thus mentioned as "v2". > [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add sclk_spdif clocks. > ?o v1 patch is https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/867882/ > [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add EPLL clock operations > ?o v1 patch is https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/867872/ > > Best Regards, > Naveen Krishna Chatradhi > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in > the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at ?http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Shine bright, (: Nav :) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-07-20 9:52 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-06-21 11:24 [PATCH V2 0/3] ARM: Add SPDIF support for EXYNOS4 Naveen Krishna Chatradhi 2011-06-21 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: Samsung: Move duplicate code Naveen Krishna Chatradhi 2011-07-18 5:35 ` Kukjin Kim 2011-06-21 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add sclk_spdif clocks Naveen Krishna Chatradhi 2011-07-18 5:33 ` Kukjin Kim 2011-07-18 11:25 ` Naveen Krishna Ch 2011-07-20 9:52 ` Naveen Krishna Ch 2011-06-21 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add EPLL clock operations Naveen Krishna Chatradhi 2011-06-22 6:51 ` Naveen Krishna Ch 2011-06-22 8:01 ` Seungwhan Youn 2011-06-30 5:51 ` Naveen Krishna Ch 2011-06-30 7:28 ` Seungwhan Youn 2011-07-18 5:52 ` Kukjin Kim 2011-07-18 11:44 ` Naveen Krishna Ch 2011-06-30 5:54 ` [PATCH V2 0/3] ARM: Add SPDIF support for EXYNOS4 Naveen Krishna Ch
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).