From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: per.forlin@linaro.org (Per Forlin)
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:02:58 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] sdio: report error if pending IRQ but none function
	bits
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1106011029390.30544@xanadu.home>
References: <1306874008-28867-1-git-send-email-per.forlin@linaro.org>
	<1306874008-28867-3-git-send-email-per.forlin@linaro.org>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1106011029390.30544@xanadu.home>
Message-ID: <BANLkTimhzdAoXSCD0xfGwOMDE9+gbrt53A@mail.gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 1 June 2011 16:30, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 31 May 2011, Per Forlin wrote:
>
>> Return error in case of pending IRQ but none functions bits
>> in CCCR_INTx is set.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> ?drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c | ? ?5 +++++
>> ?1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
>> index 2f81ddc..8184b6e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
>> @@ -50,6 +50,11 @@ static int process_sdio_pending_irqs(struct mmc_card *card)
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return ret;
>> ? ? ? }
>>
>> + ? ? if (!pending) {
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: pending IRQ but none function bits\n",
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?mmc_card_id(card));
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ret = -EINVAL;
>> + ? ? }
>
> Nope, this won't work with the polled interrupt mode.
I'll drop this patch.

Thanks for your comment,
Per