linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] OMAP3: run the ASM sleep code from DDR
@ 2011-06-29 16:40 jean.pihet at newoldbits.com
  2011-06-29 17:29 ` Kevin Hilman
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jean.pihet at newoldbits.com @ 2011-06-29 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

From: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>

Most of the ASM sleep code (in arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S)
is copied to internal SRAM at boot and after wake-up from CORE OFF mode.
However only a small part of the code really needs to run from internal SRAM.

This fix lets most of the ASM idle code run from the DDR
in order to minimize the SRAM usage and the overhead in the code copy.

The only pieces of code that are mandatory in SRAM are:
- the i443 erratum WA,
- the i581 erratum WA,
- the security extension code.

SRAM usage:
- original code:
  . 560 bytes for omap3_sram_configure_core_dpll (used by DVFS),
  . 852 bytes for omap_sram_idle (used by suspend/resume in RETention),
  . 124 bytes for es3_sdrc_fix (used by suspend/resume in OFF mode on ES3.x),
  . 108 bytes for save_secure_ram_context (used on HS parts only).

With this fix the usage for suspend/resume in RETention goes down 288 bytes,
so the gain in SRAM usage for suspend/resume is 564 bytes.

Also fixed the SRAM initialization sequence to avoid an unnecessary
copy to SRAM at boot time and for readability.

Tested on Beagleboard (ES2.x) in idle with full RET and OFF modes.

Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h        |   20 ++-
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c    |   20 ++--
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S |  303 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c       |   15 +--
 4 files changed, 206 insertions(+), 152 deletions(-)

Rebased on the suspend branch of rmk's tree

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
index 45bcfce..a4ec213 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
@@ -88,18 +88,28 @@ extern int pm_dbg_regset_init(int reg_set);
 #define pm_dbg_regset_init(reg_set) do {} while (0);
 #endif /* CONFIG_PM_DEBUG */
 
+/* 24xx */
 extern void omap24xx_idle_loop_suspend(void);
+extern unsigned int omap24xx_idle_loop_suspend_sz;
 
 extern void omap24xx_cpu_suspend(u32 dll_ctrl, void __iomem *sdrc_dlla_ctrl,
 					void __iomem *sdrc_power);
+extern unsigned int omap24xx_cpu_suspend_sz;
+
+/* 3xxx */
 extern void omap34xx_cpu_suspend(u32 *addr, int save_state);
-extern int save_secure_ram_context(u32 *addr);
-extern void omap3_save_scratchpad_contents(void);
 
-extern unsigned int omap24xx_idle_loop_suspend_sz;
+/* omap3_do_wfi function pointer and size, for copy to SRAM */
+extern void omap3_do_wfi(void);
+extern unsigned int omap3_do_wfi_sz;
+/* ... and its pointer from SRAM after copy */
+extern void (*omap3_do_wfi_sram)(void);
+
+/* save_secure_ram_context function pointer and size, for copy to SRAM */
+extern int save_secure_ram_context(u32 *addr);
 extern unsigned int save_secure_ram_context_sz;
-extern unsigned int omap24xx_cpu_suspend_sz;
-extern unsigned int omap34xx_cpu_suspend_sz;
+
+extern void omap3_save_scratchpad_contents(void);
 
 #define PM_RTA_ERRATUM_i608		(1 << 0)
 #define PM_SDRC_WAKEUP_ERRATUM_i583	(1 << 1)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
index 3e9a13e..e1c79ba 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
@@ -78,9 +78,8 @@ struct power_state {
 
 static LIST_HEAD(pwrst_list);
 
-static void (*_omap_sram_idle)(u32 *addr, int save_state);
-
 static int (*_omap_save_secure_sram)(u32 *addr);
+void (*omap3_do_wfi_sram)(void);
 
 static struct powerdomain *mpu_pwrdm, *neon_pwrdm;
 static struct powerdomain *core_pwrdm, *per_pwrdm;
@@ -309,7 +308,7 @@ static irqreturn_t prcm_interrupt_handler (int irq, void *dev_id)
 
 static void omap34xx_do_sram_idle(unsigned long save_state)
 {
-	_omap_sram_idle(omap3_arm_context, save_state);
+	omap34xx_cpu_suspend(omap3_arm_context, save_state);
 }
 
 void omap_sram_idle(void)
@@ -328,9 +327,6 @@ void omap_sram_idle(void)
 	int core_prev_state, per_prev_state;
 	u32 sdrc_pwr = 0;
 
-	if (!_omap_sram_idle)
-		return;
-
 	pwrdm_clear_all_prev_pwrst(mpu_pwrdm);
 	pwrdm_clear_all_prev_pwrst(neon_pwrdm);
 	pwrdm_clear_all_prev_pwrst(core_pwrdm);
@@ -826,10 +822,17 @@ static int __init clkdms_setup(struct clockdomain *clkdm, void *unused)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Push functions to SRAM
+ *
+ * The minimum set of functions is pushed to SRAM for execution:
+ * - omap3_do_wfi for erratum i581 WA,
+ * - save_secure_ram_context for security extensions.
+ */
 void omap_push_sram_idle(void)
 {
-	_omap_sram_idle = omap_sram_push(omap34xx_cpu_suspend,
-					omap34xx_cpu_suspend_sz);
+	omap3_do_wfi_sram = omap_sram_push(omap3_do_wfi, omap3_do_wfi_sz);
+
 	if (omap_type() != OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_GP)
 		_omap_save_secure_sram = omap_sram_push(save_secure_ram_context,
 				save_secure_ram_context_sz);
@@ -894,7 +897,6 @@ static int __init omap3_pm_init(void)
 	per_clkdm = clkdm_lookup("per_clkdm");
 	core_clkdm = clkdm_lookup("core_clkdm");
 
-	omap_push_sram_idle();
 #ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
 	suspend_set_ops(&omap_pm_ops);
 #endif /* CONFIG_SUSPEND */
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
index d18f52e..17dbc5a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
@@ -139,8 +139,10 @@ ENTRY(save_secure_ram_context_sz)
  *
  *
  * Notes:
- * - this code gets copied to internal SRAM at boot and after wake-up
- *   from OFF mode. The execution pointer in SRAM is _omap_sram_idle.
+ * - only the minimum set of functions gets copied to internal SRAM at boot
+ *   and after wake-up from OFF mode, cf. omap_push_sram_idle. The function
+ *   pointers in SDRAM or SRAM are called depending on the desired low power
+ *   target state.
  * - when the OMAP wakes up it continues@different execution points
  *   depending on the low power mode (non-OFF vs OFF modes),
  *   cf. 'Resume path for xxx mode' comments.
@@ -158,9 +160,15 @@ ENTRY(omap34xx_cpu_suspend)
 	 *   3 - Both L1 and L2 lost and logic lost
 	 */
 
-	/* Directly jump to WFI is the context save is not required */
-	cmp	r1, #0x0
-	beq	omap3_do_wfi
+	/*
+	 * For OFF mode: save context and jump to WFI in SDRAM (omap3_do_wfi)
+	 * For non-OFF modes: jump to the WFI code in SRAM (omap3_do_wfi_sram)
+	 */
+	ldr	r4, omap3_do_wfi_sram_addr
+	ldr	r5, [r4]
+	cmp	r1, #0x0		@ If no context save required,
+	bxeq	r5			@  jump to the WFI code in SRAM
+
 
 	/* Otherwise fall through to the save context code */
 save_context_wfi:
@@ -213,7 +221,32 @@ save_context_wfi:
  THUMB(	nop		)
 	.arm
 
-omap3_do_wfi:
+	b	omap3_do_wfi
+
+/*
+ * Local variables
+ */
+omap3_do_wfi_sram_addr:
+	.word omap3_do_wfi_sram
+kernel_flush:
+	.word v7_flush_dcache_all
+
+/* ===================================
+ * == WFI instruction => Enter idle ==
+ * ===================================
+ */
+
+/*
+ * Do WFI instruction
+ * Includes the resume path for non-OFF modes
+ *
+ * This code gets copied to internal SRAM and is accessible
+ * from both SDRAM and SRAM:
+ * - executed from SRAM for non-off modes (omap3_do_wfi_sram),
+ * - executed from SDRAM for OFF mode (omap3_do_wfi).
+ */
+	.align	3
+ENTRY(omap3_do_wfi)
 	ldr	r4, sdrc_power		@ read the SDRC_POWER register
 	ldr	r5, [r4]		@ read the contents of SDRC_POWER
 	orr	r5, r5, #0x40		@ enable self refresh on idle req
@@ -245,8 +278,86 @@ omap3_do_wfi:
 	nop
 	nop
 	nop
-	bl wait_sdrc_ok
 
+/*
+ * This function implements the erratum ID i581 WA:
+ *  SDRC state restore before accessing the SDRAM
+ *
+ * Only used at return from non-OFF mode. For OFF
+ * mode the ROM code configures the SDRC and
+ * the DPLL before calling the restore code directly
+ * from DDR.
+ */
+
+/* Make sure SDRC accesses are ok */
+wait_sdrc_ok:
+
+/* DPLL3 must be locked before accessing the SDRC. Maybe the HW ensures this */
+	ldr	r4, cm_idlest_ckgen
+wait_dpll3_lock:
+	ldr	r5, [r4]
+	tst	r5, #1
+	beq	wait_dpll3_lock
+
+	ldr	r4, cm_idlest1_core
+wait_sdrc_ready:
+	ldr	r5, [r4]
+	tst	r5, #0x2
+	bne	wait_sdrc_ready
+	/* allow DLL powerdown upon hw idle req */
+	ldr	r4, sdrc_power
+	ldr	r5, [r4]
+	bic	r5, r5, #0x40
+	str	r5, [r4]
+
+/*
+ * PC-relative stores lead to undefined behaviour in Thumb-2: use a r7 as a
+ * base instead.
+ * Be careful not to clobber r7 when maintaing this code.
+ */
+
+is_dll_in_lock_mode:
+	/* Is dll in lock mode? */
+	ldr	r4, sdrc_dlla_ctrl
+	ldr	r5, [r4]
+	tst	r5, #0x4
+	bne	exit_nonoff_modes	@ Return if locked
+	/* wait till dll locks */
+	adr	r7, kick_counter
+wait_dll_lock_timed:
+	ldr	r4, wait_dll_lock_counter
+	add	r4, r4, #1
+	str	r4, [r7, #wait_dll_lock_counter - kick_counter]
+	ldr	r4, sdrc_dlla_status
+	/* Wait 20uS for lock */
+	mov	r6, #8
+wait_dll_lock:
+	subs	r6, r6, #0x1
+	beq	kick_dll
+	ldr	r5, [r4]
+	and	r5, r5, #0x4
+	cmp	r5, #0x4
+	bne	wait_dll_lock
+	b	exit_nonoff_modes	@ Return when locked
+
+	/* disable/reenable DLL if not locked */
+kick_dll:
+	ldr	r4, sdrc_dlla_ctrl
+	ldr	r5, [r4]
+	mov	r6, r5
+	bic	r6, #(1<<3)		@ disable dll
+	str	r6, [r4]
+	dsb
+	orr	r6, r6, #(1<<3)		@ enable dll
+	str	r6, [r4]
+	dsb
+	ldr	r4, kick_counter
+	add	r4, r4, #1
+	str	r4, [r7]		@ kick_counter
+	b	wait_dll_lock_timed
+
+exit_nonoff_modes:
+	/* Re-enable C-bit if needed */
 	mrc	p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 0
 	tst	r0, #(1 << 2)		@ Check C bit enabled?
 	orreq	r0, r0, #(1 << 2)	@ Enable the C bit if cleared
@@ -260,6 +371,31 @@ omap3_do_wfi:
  */
 	ldmfd	sp!, {r4 - r11, pc}	@ restore regs and return
 
+/*
+ * Local variables
+ */
+sdrc_power:
+	.word	SDRC_POWER_V
+cm_idlest1_core:
+	.word	CM_IDLEST1_CORE_V
+cm_idlest_ckgen:
+	.word	CM_IDLEST_CKGEN_V
+sdrc_dlla_status:
+	.word	SDRC_DLLA_STATUS_V
+sdrc_dlla_ctrl:
+	.word	SDRC_DLLA_CTRL_V
+	/*
+	 * When exporting to userspace while the counters are in SRAM,
+	 * these 2 words need to be@the end to facilitate retrival!
+	 */
+kick_counter:
+	.word	0
+wait_dll_lock_counter:
+	.word	0
+
+ENTRY(omap3_do_wfi_sz)
+	.word	. - omap3_do_wfi
+
 
 /*
  * ==============================
@@ -275,13 +411,17 @@ omap3_do_wfi:
  *  restore_es3: applies to 34xx >= ES3.0
  *  restore_3630: applies to 36xx
  *  restore: common code for 3xxx
+ *
+ * Note: when back from CORE and MPU OFF mode we are running
+ *  from SDRAM, without MMU, without the caches and prediction.
+ *  Also the SRAM content has been cleared.
  */
 ENTRY(omap3_restore_es3)
 	ldr	r5, pm_prepwstst_core_p
 	ldr	r4, [r5]
 	and	r4, r4, #0x3
 	cmp	r4, #0x0	@ Check if previous power state of CORE is OFF
-	bne	omap3_restore
+	bne	omap3_restore	@ Fall through to OMAP3 common code
 	adr	r0, es3_sdrc_fix
 	ldr	r1, sram_base
 	ldr	r2, es3_sdrc_fix_sz
@@ -293,7 +433,7 @@ copy_to_sram:
 	bne	copy_to_sram
 	ldr	r1, sram_base
 	blx	r1
-	b	omap3_restore
+	b	omap3_restore	@ Fall through to OMAP3 common code
 ENDPROC(omap3_restore_es3)
 
 ENTRY(omap3_restore_3630)
@@ -301,7 +441,7 @@ ENTRY(omap3_restore_3630)
 	ldr	r2, [r1]
 	and	r2, r2, #0x3
 	cmp	r2, #0x0	@ Check if previous power state of CORE is OFF
-	bne	omap3_restore
+	bne	omap3_restore	@ Fall through to OMAP3 common code
 	/* Disable RTA before giving control */
 	ldr	r1, control_mem_rta
 	mov	r2, #OMAP36XX_RTA_DISABLE
@@ -405,10 +545,31 @@ ENDPROC(omap3_restore)
 	.ltorg
 
 /*
+ * Local variables
+ */
+pm_prepwstst_core_p:
+	.word	PM_PREPWSTST_CORE_P
+pm_pwstctrl_mpu:
+	.word	PM_PWSTCTRL_MPU_P
+scratchpad_base:
+	.word	SCRATCHPAD_BASE_P
+sram_base:
+	.word	SRAM_BASE_P + 0x8000
+control_stat:
+	.word	CONTROL_STAT
+control_mem_rta:
+	.word	CONTROL_MEM_RTA_CTRL
+l2dis_3630:
+	.word	0
+
+/*
  * Internal functions
  */
 
-/* This function implements the erratum ID i443 WA, applies to 34xx >= ES3.0 */
+/*
+ * This function implements the erratum ID i443 WA, applies to 34xx >= ES3.0
+ * Copied to and run from SRAM in order to reconfigure the SDRC parameters.
+ */
 	.text
 	.align	3
 ENTRY(es3_sdrc_fix)
@@ -438,6 +599,9 @@ ENTRY(es3_sdrc_fix)
 	str	r5, [r4]		@ kick off refreshes
 	bx	lr
 
+/*
+ * Local variables
+ */
 	.align
 sdrc_syscfg:
 	.word	SDRC_SYSCONFIG_P
@@ -456,120 +620,3 @@ sdrc_manual_1:
 ENDPROC(es3_sdrc_fix)
 ENTRY(es3_sdrc_fix_sz)
 	.word	. - es3_sdrc_fix
-
-/*
- * This function implements the erratum ID i581 WA:
- *  SDRC state restore before accessing the SDRAM
- *
- * Only used at return from non-OFF mode. For OFF
- * mode the ROM code configures the SDRC and
- * the DPLL before calling the restore code directly
- * from DDR.
- */
-
-/* Make sure SDRC accesses are ok */
-wait_sdrc_ok:
-
-/* DPLL3 must be locked before accessing the SDRC. Maybe the HW ensures this */
-	ldr	r4, cm_idlest_ckgen
-wait_dpll3_lock:
-	ldr	r5, [r4]
-	tst	r5, #1
-	beq	wait_dpll3_lock
-
-	ldr	r4, cm_idlest1_core
-wait_sdrc_ready:
-	ldr	r5, [r4]
-	tst	r5, #0x2
-	bne	wait_sdrc_ready
-	/* allow DLL powerdown upon hw idle req */
-	ldr	r4, sdrc_power
-	ldr	r5, [r4]
-	bic	r5, r5, #0x40
-	str	r5, [r4]
-
-/*
- * PC-relative stores lead to undefined behaviour in Thumb-2: use a r7 as a
- * base instead.
- * Be careful not to clobber r7 when maintaing this code.
- */
-
-is_dll_in_lock_mode:
-	/* Is dll in lock mode? */
-	ldr	r4, sdrc_dlla_ctrl
-	ldr	r5, [r4]
-	tst	r5, #0x4
-	bxne	lr			@ Return if locked
-	/* wait till dll locks */
-	adr	r7, kick_counter
-wait_dll_lock_timed:
-	ldr	r4, wait_dll_lock_counter
-	add	r4, r4, #1
-	str	r4, [r7, #wait_dll_lock_counter - kick_counter]
-	ldr	r4, sdrc_dlla_status
-	/* Wait 20uS for lock */
-	mov	r6, #8
-wait_dll_lock:
-	subs	r6, r6, #0x1
-	beq	kick_dll
-	ldr	r5, [r4]
-	and	r5, r5, #0x4
-	cmp	r5, #0x4
-	bne	wait_dll_lock
-	bx	lr			@ Return when locked
-
-	/* disable/reenable DLL if not locked */
-kick_dll:
-	ldr	r4, sdrc_dlla_ctrl
-	ldr	r5, [r4]
-	mov	r6, r5
-	bic	r6, #(1<<3)		@ disable dll
-	str	r6, [r4]
-	dsb
-	orr	r6, r6, #(1<<3)		@ enable dll
-	str	r6, [r4]
-	dsb
-	ldr	r4, kick_counter
-	add	r4, r4, #1
-	str	r4, [r7]		@ kick_counter
-	b	wait_dll_lock_timed
-
-	.align
-cm_idlest1_core:
-	.word	CM_IDLEST1_CORE_V
-cm_idlest_ckgen:
-	.word	CM_IDLEST_CKGEN_V
-sdrc_dlla_status:
-	.word	SDRC_DLLA_STATUS_V
-sdrc_dlla_ctrl:
-	.word	SDRC_DLLA_CTRL_V
-pm_prepwstst_core_p:
-	.word	PM_PREPWSTST_CORE_P
-pm_pwstctrl_mpu:
-	.word	PM_PWSTCTRL_MPU_P
-scratchpad_base:
-	.word	SCRATCHPAD_BASE_P
-sram_base:
-	.word	SRAM_BASE_P + 0x8000
-sdrc_power:
-	.word	SDRC_POWER_V
-control_stat:
-	.word	CONTROL_STAT
-control_mem_rta:
-	.word	CONTROL_MEM_RTA_CTRL
-kernel_flush:
-	.word	v7_flush_dcache_all
-l2dis_3630:
-	.word	0
-	/*
-	 * When exporting to userspace while the counters are in SRAM,
-	 * these 2 words need to be@the end to facilitate retrival!
-	 */
-kick_counter:
-	.word	0
-wait_dll_lock_counter:
-	.word	0
-ENDPROC(omap34xx_cpu_suspend)
-
-ENTRY(omap34xx_cpu_suspend_sz)
-	.word	. - omap34xx_cpu_suspend
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c
index 6af3d0b..363c91e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c
@@ -394,20 +394,15 @@ void omap3_sram_restore_context(void)
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_PM */
 
-static int __init omap34xx_sram_init(void)
-{
-	_omap3_sram_configure_core_dpll =
-		omap_sram_push(omap3_sram_configure_core_dpll,
-			       omap3_sram_configure_core_dpll_sz);
-	omap_push_sram_idle();
-	return 0;
-}
-#else
+#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3 */
+
 static inline int omap34xx_sram_init(void)
 {
+#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3) && defined(CONFIG_PM)
+	omap3_sram_restore_context();
+#endif
 	return 0;
 }
-#endif
 
 int __init omap_sram_init(void)
 {
-- 
1.7.4.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] OMAP3: run the ASM sleep code from DDR
  2011-06-29 16:40 [PATCH] OMAP3: run the ASM sleep code from DDR jean.pihet at newoldbits.com
@ 2011-06-29 17:29 ` Kevin Hilman
  2011-06-29 17:48   ` Jean Pihet
  2011-06-29 18:05   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  2011-06-29 21:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  2011-07-12  6:07 ` Pavel Machek
  2 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Hilman @ 2011-06-29 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

jean.pihet at newoldbits.com writes:

> From: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
>
> Most of the ASM sleep code (in arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S)
> is copied to internal SRAM at boot and after wake-up from CORE OFF mode.
> However only a small part of the code really needs to run from internal SRAM.
>
> This fix lets most of the ASM idle code run from the DDR
> in order to minimize the SRAM usage and the overhead in the code copy.
>
> The only pieces of code that are mandatory in SRAM are:
> - the i443 erratum WA,
> - the i581 erratum WA,
> - the security extension code.
>
> SRAM usage:
> - original code:
>   . 560 bytes for omap3_sram_configure_core_dpll (used by DVFS),
>   . 852 bytes for omap_sram_idle (used by suspend/resume in RETention),
>   . 124 bytes for es3_sdrc_fix (used by suspend/resume in OFF mode on ES3.x),
>   . 108 bytes for save_secure_ram_context (used on HS parts only).
>
> With this fix the usage for suspend/resume in RETention goes down 288 bytes,
> so the gain in SRAM usage for suspend/resume is 564 bytes.
>
> Also fixed the SRAM initialization sequence to avoid an unnecessary
> copy to SRAM at boot time and for readability.
>
> Tested on Beagleboard (ES2.x) in idle with full RET and OFF modes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>

Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>

Also tested retention and off on 3430/n900, 3530/Overo and 3630/Zoom3

Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>

Russell, if you're OK with it, can you add it to your suspend branch for
the upcoming merge window?

Kevin

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] OMAP3: run the ASM sleep code from DDR
  2011-06-29 17:29 ` Kevin Hilman
@ 2011-06-29 17:48   ` Jean Pihet
  2011-06-29 18:05   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jean Pihet @ 2011-06-29 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> wrote:
> jean.pihet at newoldbits.com writes:
>
>> From: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
>>
>> Most of the ASM sleep code (in arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S)
>> is copied to internal SRAM at boot and after wake-up from CORE OFF mode.
>> However only a small part of the code really needs to run from internal SRAM.
>>
>> This fix lets most of the ASM idle code run from the DDR
>> in order to minimize the SRAM usage and the overhead in the code copy.
>>
>> The only pieces of code that are mandatory in SRAM are:
>> - the i443 erratum WA,
>> - the i581 erratum WA,
>> - the security extension code.
>>
>> SRAM usage:
>> - original code:
>> ? . 560 bytes for omap3_sram_configure_core_dpll (used by DVFS),
>> ? . 852 bytes for omap_sram_idle (used by suspend/resume in RETention),
>> ? . 124 bytes for es3_sdrc_fix (used by suspend/resume in OFF mode on ES3.x),
>> ? . 108 bytes for save_secure_ram_context (used on HS parts only).
>>
>> With this fix the usage for suspend/resume in RETention goes down 288 bytes,
>> so the gain in SRAM usage for suspend/resume is 564 bytes.
>>
>> Also fixed the SRAM initialization sequence to avoid an unnecessary
>> copy to SRAM at boot time and for readability.
>>
>> Tested on Beagleboard (ES2.x) in idle with full RET and OFF modes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>
> Also tested retention and off on 3430/n900, 3530/Overo and 3630/Zoom3
>
> Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Thanks for the extensive testing!

Regards,
Jean

>
> Russell, if you're OK with it, can you add it to your suspend branch for
> the upcoming merge window?
>
> Kevin
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] OMAP3: run the ASM sleep code from DDR
  2011-06-29 17:29 ` Kevin Hilman
  2011-06-29 17:48   ` Jean Pihet
@ 2011-06-29 18:05   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  2011-06-29 19:06     ` Kevin Hilman
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2011-06-29 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:29:49AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Russell, if you're OK with it, can you add it to your suspend branch for
> the upcoming merge window?

Yes - though I think we can go a little bit further - this patch is on
top of my code so far, and is untested.  There isn't a need for the
saving of these registers to be in assembly because we can read them
just as easily from C code.

Comments?

 arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h        |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c    |   19 +++++++++++++++++--
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S |   12 ++----------
 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
index 45bcfce..4984cca 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ extern void omap24xx_idle_loop_suspend(void);
 
 extern void omap24xx_cpu_suspend(u32 dll_ctrl, void __iomem *sdrc_dlla_ctrl,
 					void __iomem *sdrc_power);
-extern void omap34xx_cpu_suspend(u32 *addr, int save_state);
+extern void omap34xx_cpu_suspend(int save_state);
 extern int save_secure_ram_context(u32 *addr);
 extern void omap3_save_scratchpad_contents(void);
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
index 3e9a13e..6366352 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ struct power_state {
 
 static LIST_HEAD(pwrst_list);
 
-static void (*_omap_sram_idle)(u32 *addr, int save_state);
+static void (*_omap_sram_idle)(int save_state);
 
 static int (*_omap_save_secure_sram)(u32 *addr);
 
@@ -307,9 +307,22 @@ static irqreturn_t prcm_interrupt_handler (int irq, void *dev_id)
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 
+static void omap34xx_save_context(u32 *save)
+{
+	u32 val;
+
+	asm("mrc p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1" : "=r" (val));
+	*save++ = 1;
+	*save++ = val;
+
+	asm("mrc p15, 1, %0, c9, c0, 2" : "=r" (val));
+	*save++ = 1;
+	*save++ = val;
+}
+
 static void omap34xx_do_sram_idle(unsigned long save_state)
 {
-	_omap_sram_idle(omap3_arm_context, save_state);
+	_omap_sram_idle(save_state);
 }
 
 void omap_sram_idle(void)
@@ -412,6 +425,8 @@ void omap_sram_idle(void)
 	 * get saved. The rest is placed on the stack, and restored
 	 * from there before resuming.
 	 */
+	if (save_state)
+		omap34xx_save_context(omap3_arm_context);
 	if (save_state == 1 || save_state == 3)
 		cpu_suspend(save_state, omap34xx_do_sram_idle);
 	else
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
index d18f52e..3335753 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
@@ -150,8 +150,7 @@ ENTRY(omap34xx_cpu_suspend)
 	stmfd	sp!, {r4 - r11, lr}	@ save registers on stack
 
 	/*
-	 * r0 contains CPU context save/restore pointer in sdram
-	 * r1 contains information about saving context:
+	 * r0 contains information about saving context:
 	 *   0 - No context lost
 	 *   1 - Only L1 and logic lost
 	 *   2 - Only L2 lost (Even L1 is retained we clean it along with L2)
@@ -159,18 +158,11 @@ ENTRY(omap34xx_cpu_suspend)
 	 */
 
 	/* Directly jump to WFI is the context save is not required */
-	cmp	r1, #0x0
+	cmp	r0, #0x0
 	beq	omap3_do_wfi
 
 	/* Otherwise fall through to the save context code */
 save_context_wfi:
-	mov	r8, r0			@ Store SDRAM address in r8
-	mrc	p15, 0, r5, c1, c0, 1	@ Read Auxiliary Control Register
-	mov	r4, #0x1		@ Number of parameters for restore call
-	stmia	r8!, {r4-r5}		@ Push parameters for restore call
-	mrc	p15, 1, r5, c9, c0, 2	@ Read L2 AUX ctrl register
-	stmia	r8!, {r4-r5}		@ Push parameters for restore call
-
 	/*
 	 * jump out to kernel flush routine
 	 *  - reuse that code is better

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] OMAP3: run the ASM sleep code from DDR
  2011-06-29 18:05   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
@ 2011-06-29 19:06     ` Kevin Hilman
  2011-06-29 21:54       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Hilman @ 2011-06-29 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> writes:

> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:29:49AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Russell, if you're OK with it, can you add it to your suspend branch for
>> the upcoming merge window?
>
> Yes - though I think we can go a little bit further - this patch is on
> top of my code so far, and is untested.  There isn't a need for the
> saving of these registers to be in assembly because we can read them
> just as easily from C code.

Indeed

> Comments?

Looks good to me (although untested) care to respin on top of $SUBJECT
patch?  

Minor comments below...

>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h        |    2 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c    |   19 +++++++++++++++++--
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S |   12 ++----------
>  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
> index 45bcfce..4984cca 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ extern void omap24xx_idle_loop_suspend(void);
>  
>  extern void omap24xx_cpu_suspend(u32 dll_ctrl, void __iomem *sdrc_dlla_ctrl,
>  					void __iomem *sdrc_power);
> -extern void omap34xx_cpu_suspend(u32 *addr, int save_state);
> +extern void omap34xx_cpu_suspend(int save_state);
>  extern int save_secure_ram_context(u32 *addr);
>  extern void omap3_save_scratchpad_contents(void);
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> index 3e9a13e..6366352 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ struct power_state {
>  
>  static LIST_HEAD(pwrst_list);
>  
> -static void (*_omap_sram_idle)(u32 *addr, int save_state);
> +static void (*_omap_sram_idle)(int save_state);
>  
>  static int (*_omap_save_secure_sram)(u32 *addr);
>  
> @@ -307,9 +307,22 @@ static irqreturn_t prcm_interrupt_handler (int irq, void *dev_id)
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> +static void omap34xx_save_context(u32 *save)
> +{
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	asm("mrc p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1" : "=r" (val));

Minor: for those of us who don't have all these registers memorized when
looking at the assembly, maybe keeping the original comments (e.g. "Read
AUX 

> +	*save++ = 1;
> +	*save++ = val;
> +
> +	asm("mrc p15, 1, %0, c9, c0, 2" : "=r" (val));
> +	*save++ = 1;
> +	*save++ = val;
> +}
> +
>  static void omap34xx_do_sram_idle(unsigned long save_state)
>  {
> -	_omap_sram_idle(omap3_arm_context, save_state);
> +	_omap_sram_idle(save_state);
>  }
>  
>  void omap_sram_idle(void)
> @@ -412,6 +425,8 @@ void omap_sram_idle(void)
>  	 * get saved. The rest is placed on the stack, and restored
>  	 * from there before resuming.
>  	 */
> +	if (save_state)
> +		omap34xx_save_context(omap3_arm_context);
>  	if (save_state == 1 || save_state == 3)
>  		cpu_suspend(save_state, omap34xx_do_sram_idle);
>  	else
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
> index d18f52e..3335753 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
> @@ -150,8 +150,7 @@ ENTRY(omap34xx_cpu_suspend)
>  	stmfd	sp!, {r4 - r11, lr}	@ save registers on stack
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * r0 contains CPU context save/restore pointer in sdram
> -	 * r1 contains information about saving context:
> +	 * r0 contains information about saving context:
>  	 *   0 - No context lost
>  	 *   1 - Only L1 and logic lost
>  	 *   2 - Only L2 lost (Even L1 is retained we clean it along with L2)
> @@ -159,18 +158,11 @@ ENTRY(omap34xx_cpu_suspend)
>  	 */
>  
>  	/* Directly jump to WFI is the context save is not required */
> -	cmp	r1, #0x0
> +	cmp	r0, #0x0
>  	beq	omap3_do_wfi
>  
>  	/* Otherwise fall through to the save context code */
>  save_context_wfi:
> -	mov	r8, r0			@ Store SDRAM address in r8
> -	mrc	p15, 0, r5, c1, c0, 1	@ Read Auxiliary Control Register
> -	mov	r4, #0x1		@ Number of parameters for restore call
> -	stmia	r8!, {r4-r5}		@ Push parameters for restore call
> -	mrc	p15, 1, r5, c9, c0, 2	@ Read L2 AUX ctrl register
> -	stmia	r8!, {r4-r5}		@ Push parameters for restore call
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * jump out to kernel flush routine
>  	 *  - reuse that code is better

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] OMAP3: run the ASM sleep code from DDR
  2011-06-29 16:40 [PATCH] OMAP3: run the ASM sleep code from DDR jean.pihet at newoldbits.com
  2011-06-29 17:29 ` Kevin Hilman
@ 2011-06-29 21:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  2011-07-12  6:07 ` Pavel Machek
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2011-06-29 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 06:40:23PM +0200, jean.pihet at newoldbits.com wrote:
> @@ -309,7 +308,7 @@ static irqreturn_t prcm_interrupt_handler (int irq, void *dev_id)
>  
>  static void omap34xx_do_sram_idle(unsigned long save_state)
>  {
> -	_omap_sram_idle(omap3_arm_context, save_state);
> +	omap34xx_cpu_suspend(omap3_arm_context, save_state);

Actually, this should be called omap34xx_soc_suspend() or
omap34xx_finish_suspend() - finish_suspend() reflects the naming
of other such functions elsewhere.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] OMAP3: run the ASM sleep code from DDR
  2011-06-29 19:06     ` Kevin Hilman
@ 2011-06-29 21:54       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  2011-06-29 23:30         ` Kevin Hilman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2011-06-29 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:06:07PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:29:49AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> >> Russell, if you're OK with it, can you add it to your suspend branch for
> >> the upcoming merge window?
> >
> > Yes - though I think we can go a little bit further - this patch is on
> > top of my code so far, and is untested.  There isn't a need for the
> > saving of these registers to be in assembly because we can read them
> > just as easily from C code.
> 
> Indeed
> 
> > Comments?
> 
> Looks good to me (although untested) care to respin on top of $SUBJECT
> patch?  
> 
> Minor comments below...

Done.

 arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h        |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c    |   19 ++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S |   12 ++----------
 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
index a4ec213..04ee566 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ extern void omap24xx_cpu_suspend(u32 dll_ctrl, void __iomem *sdrc_dlla_ctrl,
 extern unsigned int omap24xx_cpu_suspend_sz;
 
 /* 3xxx */
-extern void omap34xx_cpu_suspend(u32 *addr, int save_state);
+extern void omap34xx_cpu_suspend(int save_state);
 
 /* omap3_do_wfi function pointer and size, for copy to SRAM */
 extern void omap3_do_wfi(void);
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
index e1c79ba..7238a63 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
@@ -306,9 +306,24 @@ static irqreturn_t prcm_interrupt_handler (int irq, void *dev_id)
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 
+static void omap34xx_save_context(u32 *save)
+{
+	u32 val;
+
+	/* Read Auxiliary Control Register */
+	asm("mrc p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1" : "=r" (val));
+	*save++ = 1;
+	*save++ = val;
+
+	/* Read L2 AUX ctrl register */
+	asm("mrc p15, 1, %0, c9, c0, 2" : "=r" (val));
+	*save++ = 1;
+	*save++ = val;
+}
+
 static void omap34xx_do_sram_idle(unsigned long save_state)
 {
-	omap34xx_cpu_suspend(omap3_arm_context, save_state);
+	omap34xx_cpu_suspend(save_state);
 }
 
 void omap_sram_idle(void)
@@ -408,6 +423,8 @@ void omap_sram_idle(void)
 	 * get saved. The rest is placed on the stack, and restored
 	 * from there before resuming.
 	 */
+	if (save_state)
+		omap34xx_save_context(omap3_arm_context);
 	if (save_state == 1 || save_state == 3)
 		cpu_suspend(save_state, omap34xx_do_sram_idle);
 	else
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
index 17dbc5a..f2ea1bd 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
@@ -152,8 +152,7 @@ ENTRY(omap34xx_cpu_suspend)
 	stmfd	sp!, {r4 - r11, lr}	@ save registers on stack
 
 	/*
-	 * r0 contains CPU context save/restore pointer in sdram
-	 * r1 contains information about saving context:
+	 * r0 contains information about saving context:
 	 *   0 - No context lost
 	 *   1 - Only L1 and logic lost
 	 *   2 - Only L2 lost (Even L1 is retained we clean it along with L2)
@@ -166,19 +165,12 @@ ENTRY(omap34xx_cpu_suspend)
 	 */
 	ldr	r4, omap3_do_wfi_sram_addr
 	ldr	r5, [r4]
-	cmp	r1, #0x0		@ If no context save required,
+	cmp	r0, #0x0		@ If no context save required,
 	bxeq	r5			@  jump to the WFI code in SRAM
 
 
 	/* Otherwise fall through to the save context code */
 save_context_wfi:
-	mov	r8, r0			@ Store SDRAM address in r8
-	mrc	p15, 0, r5, c1, c0, 1	@ Read Auxiliary Control Register
-	mov	r4, #0x1		@ Number of parameters for restore call
-	stmia	r8!, {r4-r5}		@ Push parameters for restore call
-	mrc	p15, 1, r5, c9, c0, 2	@ Read L2 AUX ctrl register
-	stmia	r8!, {r4-r5}		@ Push parameters for restore call
-
 	/*
 	 * jump out to kernel flush routine
 	 *  - reuse that code is better

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] OMAP3: run the ASM sleep code from DDR
  2011-06-29 21:54       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
@ 2011-06-29 23:30         ` Kevin Hilman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Hilman @ 2011-06-29 23:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> writes:

> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:06:07PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> writes:
>> 
>> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:29:49AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> >> Russell, if you're OK with it, can you add it to your suspend branch for
>> >> the upcoming merge window?
>> >
>> > Yes - though I think we can go a little bit further - this patch is on
>> > top of my code so far, and is untested.  There isn't a need for the
>> > saving of these registers to be in assembly because we can read them
>> > just as easily from C code.
>> 
>> Indeed
>> 
>> > Comments?
>> 
>> Looks good to me (although untested) care to respin on top of $SUBJECT
>> patch?  
>> 
>> Minor comments below...
>
> Done.

Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>

Tested full-chip retention and off on 3430/n900, 3530/Overo and
3630/Zoom3.

Kevin

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] OMAP3: run the ASM sleep code from DDR
  2011-06-29 16:40 [PATCH] OMAP3: run the ASM sleep code from DDR jean.pihet at newoldbits.com
  2011-06-29 17:29 ` Kevin Hilman
  2011-06-29 21:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
@ 2011-07-12  6:07 ` Pavel Machek
  2011-07-13  8:14   ` Paul Walmsley
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2011-07-12  6:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Wed 2011-06-29 18:40:23, jean.pihet at newoldbits.com wrote:
> From: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
> 
> Most of the ASM sleep code (in arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S)
> is copied to internal SRAM at boot and after wake-up from CORE OFF mode.
> However only a small part of the code really needs to run from internal SRAM.
> 
> This fix lets most of the ASM idle code run from the DDR
> in order to minimize the SRAM usage and the overhead in the code copy.

So... what do you plan to use sram for? Because I don't think the
speedup is worth the complexity...

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] OMAP3: run the ASM sleep code from DDR
  2011-07-12  6:07 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2011-07-13  8:14   ` Paul Walmsley
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Paul Walmsley @ 2011-07-13  8:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Pavel Machek wrote:

> On Wed 2011-06-29 18:40:23, jean.pihet at newoldbits.com wrote:
> > From: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
> > 
> > Most of the ASM sleep code (in arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S)
> > is copied to internal SRAM at boot and after wake-up from CORE OFF mode.
> > However only a small part of the code really needs to run from internal SRAM.
> > 
> > This fix lets most of the ASM idle code run from the DDR
> > in order to minimize the SRAM usage and the overhead in the code copy.
> 
> So... what do you plan to use sram for? Because I don't think the
> speedup is worth the complexity...

The SDRAM may not be accessible yet when the chip isn't waking up from 
off-mode, so SRAM is the only option.  The comments & code in the patch 
surrounding the "wait_sdrc_ok" label refer to this issue - albeit, perhaps 
telegraphically.


- Paul

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-07-13  8:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-06-29 16:40 [PATCH] OMAP3: run the ASM sleep code from DDR jean.pihet at newoldbits.com
2011-06-29 17:29 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-06-29 17:48   ` Jean Pihet
2011-06-29 18:05   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-29 19:06     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-06-29 21:54       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-29 23:30         ` Kevin Hilman
2011-06-29 21:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-07-12  6:07 ` Pavel Machek
2011-07-13  8:14   ` Paul Walmsley

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).