From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ohad@wizery.com (Ohad Ben-Cohen)
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:17:07 +0300
Subject: [RFC 0/6] iommu: generic api migration and grouping
In-Reply-To: <201106061110.30601.arnd@arndb.de>
References: <1307053663-24572-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com>
	<201106031753.16095.arnd@arndb.de>
	<BANLkTim2pDu25ZudZ7ZzOwka0V1sYEhDKw@mail.gmail.com>
	<201106061110.30601.arnd@arndb.de>
Message-ID: <BANLkTin9oDn=PFSJ6MY=+MY9RxnmO4G6HA@mail.gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>> I'd still prefer us to take small steps here, and not gate the omap
>> iommu cleanups with Marek's generic dma_map_ops work though. Let's go
>> forward and migrate omap's iommu to the generic iommu API, so new code
>> will be able to use it (e.g. the long coming virtio-based IPC/AMP
>> framework).
>
> Yes, of course. That's what I meant. Moving over omap to the IOMMU API
> is required anyway, so there is no point delaying that.

Ok, great !