linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: saeed.bishara@gmail.com (saeed bishara)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] kirkwood: add dir-665 support
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 10:08:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTinJJrrOjawXM_1OWQyk7yeh_1s1Mg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikhFn--4WVGjATZL=0cCiz8qmo=jw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:20 AM, Hirundo Cam <camhirundo@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Saeed and Nicolas,
>
> 2011/5/4 saeed bishara <saeed.bishara@gmail.com>:
>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Simon Guinot <simon@sequanux.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Hirundo,
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 04:05:46PM +0800, Hirundo Cam wrote:
>>>> This patch is a hack to dir-665 by referencing mv88f6281gtw_ge board.
>>>> LEDs, GPIO, Buttons remains unknown.
>> Hirundo,
>
>> ? if this board is very similar to mv88f6281gtw_ge, you should use
>> the same board setup file. it will be great if you specify the
>> differences between the two boards.
>
> I have no mv88f6281gtw_ge board on hand.
> However, After I've looked into the setup file of mv88f6281gtw_ge.
> I've found that the NOR flash, ddr2 DRAM, switch chip, ethernet port define
> are differ from mv88f6281gtw_ge.
the spi_slave_info in your patch is identical to the one in the
mv88f6281_gtw_ge. the board setup has nothing to do with ddr2.
regarding ethernet, and the other thinks that differ between the two
boards can be probed depending on the machine type.
>
> I have no idea if we could use #if define to distinguish the different
> boards use
> the same SoC. While I want also made this adaptable in OpenWrt.
you don't need to use #ifdef, you can use the machine_is_xxx()
function to distinguish between boards.
>
>> ? please have a look at sheevaplug-setup.c to see how multiple boards
>> supported in same setup file.
>> saeed
>>
>
> Hum, I think Kernel will rely on the mach-type ID in u-boot to check
> which board is in booting. If the original u-boot has changed
> mach-type ID, I don't think us the same configuration file with
> mv88f6281gtw_ge is good. At least I've tried kernel image compiled
> with mv88f6281gtw_ge option but it seems kernel cannot be booted and
> hanged in very early stage. Just like the mach-type ID doesn't match.
you shouldn't use the mach ID of mv88f6281_gtw_ge, you should have
your own one. eventually the mv88f6281gtw_ge-setup.c will include the
MACHINE_START(MV88F6281_DIR665, "Marvell 88F6281 DIR665 Board")
structure besides to the MV88F6281GTW_GE, and the two boards will
share
the same init function, the machine_is_mv88f6281gtw_ge() and
machine_is_mv88f6281_dir665() will be used to check which board is
running (in runtime).

anyway, I hope you can do it using the device tree as Nico suggested.
saeed
should have
>
> Regards,
> Hirundo Cam
>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-05  7:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-27 16:34 [PATCH] kirkwood: add dir-665 support Hirundo Cam
2011-04-27 23:52 ` Hirundo Cam
2011-05-03 15:55 ` Hirundo Cam
2011-05-03 20:51 ` mike at compulab.co.il
2011-05-04  2:36   ` Hirundo Cam
2011-05-04  2:54     ` Hirundo Cam
2011-05-04  3:00       ` Hirundo Cam
2011-05-04  6:32         ` Mike Rapoport
2011-05-04  8:09       ` Simon Guinot
2011-05-04 13:51         ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-05-05  0:23           ` Hirundo Cam
2011-05-05 15:06           ` Simon Guinot
2011-05-05 19:55             ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-05-06 15:41               ` Simon Guinot
2011-05-06 20:59                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-05-04  3:30   ` Hirundo Cam
2011-05-04  6:31     ` Mike Rapoport
2011-05-03 21:14 ` Simon Guinot
     [not found] ` <1304496346-13557-1-git-send-email-camhirundo@gmail.com>
2011-05-04  7:56   ` [PATCH v2] " Hirundo Cam
2011-05-04  8:16   ` Simon Guinot
2011-05-04  9:50     ` saeed bishara
2011-05-05  0:20       ` Hirundo Cam
2011-05-05  7:08         ` saeed bishara [this message]
2011-05-05 15:20           ` Hirundo Cam
2011-05-05  0:11     ` Hirundo Cam
2011-05-05  7:50       ` Simon Guinot
2011-05-04  9:23 ` [PATCH] " Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BANLkTinJJrrOjawXM_1OWQyk7yeh_1s1Mg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=saeed.bishara@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).