From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: grant.likely@secretlab.ca (Grant Likely) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 12:43:30 -0600 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] net/fec: add device tree support In-Reply-To: <4DFE111B.8010001@gmail.com> References: <1308410354-21387-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <1308410354-21387-3-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <4DFDDFF4.8000305@snapgear.com> <201106191411.32137.arnd@arndb.de> <4DFE111B.8010001@gmail.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On 06/19/2011 07:11 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Sunday 19 June 2011 13:39:32 Greg Ungerer wrote: >>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF >>>> +static const struct of_device_id fec_dt_ids[] = { >>>> + ? ? { .compatible = "fsl,fec", .data =&fec_devtype[0], }, >>>> + ? ? {}, >>>> +}; >>>> + >>>> +static const struct of_device_id * >>>> +fec_get_of_device_id(struct platform_device *pdev) >>>> +{ >>>> + ? ? return of_match_device(fec_dt_ids,&pdev->dev); >>>> +} >>>> +#else >>>> +#define fec_dt_ids NULL >>>> +static inline struct of_device_id * >>>> +fec_get_of_device_id(struct platform_device *pdev) >>>> +{ >>>> + ? ? return NULL; >>>> +} >>>> +#endif >>>> + >>>> ? static unsigned char macaddr[ETH_ALEN]; >>>> ? module_param_array(macaddr, byte, NULL, 0); >>>> ? MODULE_PARM_DESC(macaddr, "FEC Ethernet MAC address"); >>>> @@ -1363,6 +1385,11 @@ fec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>>> ? ? ? struct net_device *ndev; >>>> ? ? ? int i, irq, ret = 0; >>>> ? ? ? struct resource *r; >>>> + ? ? const struct of_device_id *of_id; >>>> + >>>> + ? ? of_id = fec_get_of_device_id(pdev); >>> >>> fec_get_of_device_id() is defined inside of "#ifdef CONFIG_OF". This >>> use of it will break compilation when this is not defined. >>> >> >> >> Why? Note the #else path defining an empty function. >> > > None of this is necessary in the first place. Just call of_match_device > directly. There is already an empty function to return NULL when > CONFIG_OF is not defined. Heh, right you are. I should have caught on to that. :-) g.