* Self modifying code in ARM 11 architectures
[not found] ` <BANLkTimyju7eEgtCpb_U6s8LNHk-_FGK4Q@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2011-05-25 7:48 ` Vimal Singh
2011-05-25 11:45 ` Uwe Kleine-König
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Vimal Singh @ 2011-05-25 7:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
CC'ing correct ARM mailing list.
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Ashok Babu <ashok3d@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am no success in booting up the ARM1176 processor with the
> linux-2.6.32 kernel.
> While googling about the ARM?Harvard?architecture, I came to know that
> we have to flush/invalidate the D-Cache and I-Cache
> when using the self modifying codes.
>
> So here my questions/doubts :
> 1) Is'nt it the kernel itself is self modifying code with lots of
> function pointers ?
> ? ? If yes, how is synchronization b/w d-cache and i-cache handled in
> the kernel ?
> 2) Can this be the reason for the kernel not booting for me ?
> ? ? Because If i disable the I-Cache in the config, then the kernel
> boots up without any issues.
> Any pointers on this will be of great help.
>
> Thanks & Best Regards
> Ashok
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at ?http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Regards,
Vimal Singh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Self modifying code in ARM 11 architectures
2011-05-25 7:48 ` Self modifying code in ARM 11 architectures Vimal Singh
@ 2011-05-25 11:45 ` Uwe Kleine-König
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2011-05-25 11:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hello,
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 01:18:37PM +0530, Vimal Singh wrote:
> CC'ing correct ARM mailing list.
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Ashok Babu <ashok3d@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am no success in booting up the ARM1176 processor with the
> > linux-2.6.32 kernel.
> > While googling about the ARM?Harvard?architecture, I came to know that
> > we have to flush/invalidate the D-Cache and I-Cache
> > when using the self modifying codes.
> >
> > So here my questions/doubts :
> > 1) Is'nt it the kernel itself is self modifying code with lots of
> > function pointers ?
Code that uses function pointer isn't usually called self-modifying.
> > ? ? If yes, how is synchronization b/w d-cache and i-cache handled in
> > the kernel ?
> > 2) Can this be the reason for the kernel not booting for me ?
> > ? ? Because If i disable the I-Cache in the config, then the kernel
> > boots up without any issues.
> > Any pointers on this will be of great help.
Does your bootloader correctly disables the I-Cache before giving control
to Linux?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-05-25 11:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <BANLkTi=mVsYiubqtJO2BmWvExMvUFRg6dg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <BANLkTimyju7eEgtCpb_U6s8LNHk-_FGK4Q@mail.gmail.com>
2011-05-25 7:48 ` Self modifying code in ARM 11 architectures Vimal Singh
2011-05-25 11:45 ` Uwe Kleine-König
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).